Lie Detector ?? #FreeMissingTwins #PressStatement 20

 

PRESS STATEMENT 20

Tell you what MICHAEL WATTER , why don’t you let us pay for you AND Cassie to have a LIE DETECTOR test ?

It will save you money and we would pay for it out of the goodness of our hearts because we respect your honesty so much !

Qld Covert Investigationscould do the test . We hear they are really good and then once you have done the test through them you could look at http://polygraph.com.au/… to get a back up on whether or not the first guys can be believed or not . We are more than happy to accept reports from both of them and pay both of them ! What do you you think ” Oh Innocent One ” ?

In anticipation of your answering yes ( be still my beating heart ) we will give you a list of questions to practice your answers on so you cannot say you were ambushed in any way and at least you can prepare your lies accordingly in the hope of beating the test ! In all fairness to you we will also ask her relevant questions .

Let us start with Cassie’s questions first :–

1. Has MICHAEL WATTER ever raped you ?

2. Has MICHAEL WATTER ever physically abused you ?

3. Did you coach your children in any way to say that MICHAEL WATTER , their father,  had raped them ?

4. Did you coach your children in any way to say that MICHAEL WATTER their father made them play with his penis and masturbate him ?

5. Did you coach your children in any way to say that their father MICHAEL WATTER had played with their vaginas ?

6. Have you lied to any of the psychiatrists and or psychologists ?

7. Have you lied to the police ?

8. Did your husband MICHAEL WATTER break into your premises and ridicule , threaten , abuse and rape you ?

9. Have the police ever threatened you ?

10. Have you ever threatened your husband MICHAEL WATTER and if so what with ?

 

Now MICHAEL WATTER let us suggest a few questions for you –

1. MICHAEL WATTER  have you EVER raped your wife ?

2. MICHAEL WATTER have you EVER physically abused your wife  ?

3. MICHAEL WATTER have you ever raped your twin girls ?

4. MICHAEL WATTER have you ever made your twin daughters play with your penis and masturbate you ?

5. MICHAEL WATTER have you ever played with your daughters vaginas ?

6. MICHAEL WATTER have you ever had a sexually transmitted disease ?

7. MICHAEL WATTER have you passed on this disease to your wife , children or anyone else ?

8. MICHAEL WATTER have you ever broken into your wife’s premises and ridiculed , threatened , abused or raped her ?

9. MICHAEL WATTER have the police ever threatened you ?

10. MICHAEL WATTER has your wife ever threatened you and if so what with ?

11. MICHAEL WATTER have you ever recorded the sexual abuse of your children on your mobile phone ?

12. MICHAEL WATTER have you ever shared these sexual abuse movies with anyone else ( assuming you answered yes to the previous question that is )

13. MICHAEL WATTER have you ever shared the sexual abuse of your children with any of your friends ?

14. MICHAEL WATTER have you ever threatened anyone who has posted on your page and even those who haven’t ?

15. MICHAEL WATTER did you teach/tell your children to say that the sexual abuse they were experiencing was a dream ?

We have numerous other questions for you and Cassie but believe these will do to give all of us a guideline on who is lying and who is telling the truth .

Fair enough ?

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER
Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

628 total views, 1 views today

MICHAEL WATTER we have 11 , yes 11 more videos to be viewed !! Be afraid , be very afraid ! #FreeMissingTwins #PressStatement19

 

Press Statement 18

MICHAEL WATTER , some VERY kind , concerned HONEST individual in a government department has  sent to us a further ELEVEN interviews which will shock , horrify , and disgust even your most ardent supporters and enablers ! Yes MICHAEL , ELEVEN more videos that will open eyes and ears .

We will publish these interviews shortly and no doubt you will await them with bated breath ! Please do not hold your breath as we want you alive to go to the place we so strongly believe you belong !

The only delay in publishing them will come from the experts we have reviewing the videos as they will add their comments based on their expertise in dealing with all paedophile related matters !

You won’t be the only one holding your breath . We know a few policemen , child protection individuals and certain politicians who will be joining you !

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER
Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

 

510 total views, no views today

Remember this lady MICHAEL WATTER !!! Freda saw you for EXACTLY what you are ! #FreeMissingTwins #PressStatement18

ARE MOTHERS AND CHILDREN BEING SILENCED IN FAMILY COURT.
By
Professor Freda Briggs

A few extracts from the link.
CEOs and even ministers of child protection services have often expressed the belief that state police and child protection services are not allowed to investigate disclosures of abuse if there is a Family Court case involved unless “it is a matter of life and death”. Even when a South Australian child was the sole carer of a father with 2 convictions for child sex offences, violence and was dying of AIDS, the department said it could not intervene. Children’s Commissioners say that this widespread belief is false.

Unsubstantiated might mean that the abuser threatened the child into silence and s/he was too afraid to reveal all to complete strangers. It might also mean that the accused parent had residence of the child and was the one responsible for taking the child for assessment.

Child sex offenders are masters of manipulation. They not only groom the child, they groom all those responsible for the child’s safety. The labelling of the mother as mad or bad might mean that the abuser groomed and charmed the police, social workers and even the judge.

I know mothers who have paid up to $1M for family lawyers and have received bills for $37,000 for one Family Court ordered report from a NSW psychiatrist. Some have lost their homes and been declared bankrupt in their unsuccessful efforts to protect their children. Would they suffer so much simply to spite their ex?

Read full story ??

http://familylaw.singlemum.com.au/unsubstantiated-child-abuse-in-court–01072014-freda-briggs.html

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER
Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

518 total views, no views today

A Blessed Christmas to Cassie and the girls !#FreeMissingTwins #PressStatement17

WE take this opportunity to wish Cassie and the twins Isabella and Bronte Watter a Blessed Christmas and wish for them all they wish themselves in the New Year .

We pray the good Lord brings to an end the horror brought upon them whilst  in the custody of their paedophile father !

We pray the good Lord continues to keep the three of them  safe  .

We pray the corruption and cover ups by the police , child protection , politicians and the judiciary are finally exposed !

We pray that justice is seen to be done and that there is a RE INVESTIGATION into this case !

We pray the grandparents get to see their daughter and grandchildren in the New Year !

Cassie , we will continue to be a voice for you and the children for as long as it takes to bring justice and safety to the three of you !

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

240 total views, 1 views today

Your chance to present your story MICHAEL WATTER #FreeMissingTwins #PressStatement18

Have you seen Bronte and Isabella?Non-identical twins, Isabella and Bronte WATTER were seven at the time of their abduction.The girls were last seen when their father, Michael, dropped them at their Townsville school on 4 April 2014. It is believed the children were abducted by their mother, Catherine WATTER (also known as Cassie), before they reached the classroom.It has been three years since their disappearance and the girls are now 10.Michael urges the public to have community awareness and a knowledge of the people around them, and if you see anyone matching Isabella or Bronte’s description to contact #CrimeStoppers on 1800 333 000. Remember, if you call #CrimeStoppers you can remain anonymous and your information is treated confidentially.The Australian Federal Police reminds the public that in some circumstances, parental child abduction is a serious crime. It is important to remember that anyone who assists a parent to abduct a child, including the ongoing concealment of that child, may face a maximum penalty of imprisonment for 7 years.Stay tuned to hear from the remaining families you saw featured as part of IMCD on 25 May.#MissingPersons #IMCD2017 #HelpBringThemHome

Posted by The National Missing Persons Coordination Centre on Sunday, May 28, 2017

 

 

MICHAEL WATTER’s comments

I thought I would share a message received last night from one of Cassie Doubleday’s extended family – Julie Williams (see screenshots).

Julie asks “Why don’t you leave our innocent babies alone?” Then follows it up with an emphatic, “You will not win!”.

It’s obviously a pretty low act to send a message like this, and it clearly demonstrates the type of person/people they are. People whose goal is “winning”, not providing two little girls with a normal, healthy life.

You can imagine my concern at the influence these people are having on my children as they’ve grown up over the the last three years.

I say this because I don’t think Julie had ever seen Bronte and Isabella before they were abducted (I may have met her only once or twice), yet here she refers to my girls as “our babies”.

And if two babies and their mother were missing from your family for over three years – and you claimed to not have heard from them, to not know of their whereabouts, and to not know of their circumstances – would your focus be on hoping someone doesn’t “win”? Or would you be encouraging anyone looking for the girls and Cassie every success in finding them and getting them back to the stable, happy life they once had?

Thank you Julie for giving me hope my daughters are still alive, and more motivation to keep fighting for them.

Michael Watter

In response to the comments italicised above by MICHAEL WATTER we need to point out that the children are in hiding because they were being raped on a regular basis .  After numerous disclosures to many people their nightmare continued ! The mother had no choice but to run with the children . That ( in our esteemed opinion ) is what we call a “pretty low act ” . We thought we would just share this message MICHAEL WATTER so your renditions of self pity , crying and singing may be seen for what they are — lies , deception and fairy tales !

Can you imagine our concern at this fact ? Can you imagine the little girls continued nightmares ?

Can you imagine them in their “no win “situation , pleading for help from the authorities and receiving nothing other than to be placed back in the custody of their paedophile father to continue his heinous acts ?

No we cannot imagine your concern at their not being with you for the last three plus years — neither do we care ! What we can imagine and have seen is the happiness and relief in them as they no longer have to concern themselves with your perverted ways !

Unlike you , our focus remains on giving the twin girls a voice , keeping them happy and preventing them from further rape , whereas  your focus , remains totally , on projecting your lies to the world and having them returned to you to allow you to continue your deceit . In addition you want the mother jailed !

You have known all along they are still alive . We have told you so on many an occasion . 

We are still very interested in your explaining to all of us uninformed what your definition of a “stable , happy life ” for the children is ?  Our understanding of such terminology means that  incest and rape would not be inclusive ?  Nor would it include the sexual and physical abuse of their mother and the masturbation of yourself by your twin daughters ! Having you masturbate in front of the children and passing on sexually transmitted disease to your twin girls would also , surely not be part of the package ?

We are prepared to grant you an open interview to answer all of our questions and for you to present your side of the story ! Let the world decide whether you are guilty or NOT guilty ? What say you MICHAEL WATTER ? 

That way it can never be said you were not given a fair crack of the whip !

The whole world is looking at you which is what we want ! God forbid , that should the mother and children be found , there is no way in hell they will be returned to you and your perverted ways !

 

 WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

316 total views, 1 views today

Very interesting non partisan comments for MICHAEL WATTER and MALCOLM TURNBULL to read ! #FreeMissingTwins #PressStatement18

PRESS STATEMENT 18

WE recently published the first police and child safety interview of one of the children raped by their father and post here for your consumption , comments passed onto us , by concerned , knowledgeable and professional individuals , which leave NO DOUBT in our minds , that a RE INVESTIGATION is desperately and urgently needed into this case ! Perhaps watch the interview first if you haven’t already done so and then read and absorb the comments . 

https://www.facebook.com/FreeWatterTwins/videos/153213175194857/

Anonymous 1

No less than 12 professionals stated that the the girls were abused and it was ignored by the family law court.

I am beyond angry and disgusted, oh my God, children should only be interviewed with a child psychologist.

These gag orders should be made illegal.

The way the main stream media presented the fathers story is appalling.

I hope the mother and children are safe and never get found.

Perhaps one day this blatant abuse will be exposed and stamped out but they are putting people in jail for speaking out.

How are all these professionals feeling when all the evidence is ignored ? 

Anonymous 2

Horrific set up to fail.

The police interviews here are an absolute disgrace , the milk man would do a better job.

The whole interview was setup to fail from the start and would have been completely overwhelming for any adult survivor of abuse not to mention abused child/ren to be put through this !

I could see Bronte was uncomfortable , her little mind not given enough time to process each short ended question or correct questions , such an overload of short ended questioning .

I am beside myself here .

Seems the questions by the male police officer was pressuring Bronte to answer , was toward satisfying himself !

The officer should have known that paedophiles groom/ threaten children not to tell about their abuse , poor Bronte.

There should not have been a male officer present in the interview.

Bronte had no familiar,trusted advocate/support person present ??

The whole interview sounds rushed, along with short ended leading questioning directed toward being about the father, mother fighting and not liking each other.

Bronte was fidgeting = she is uncomfortable in the interview = her mind protecting itself and burying her abuse deeper.

Anonymous 3

Seven pages of issues with the interview.
No age appropriate interview techniques used.
Closed questions that should be open questions.
Cutting childs answers off.
Re asking same questions to obtain different answers incl CW caseworker question about feeling safe at daddy’s.
Then finished B’s answer off for her.
Then says because u r safe at daddy’s etc.
Stopped disclosures of not feeling safe at daddy’s.
Then asks n makes statement n does not give B time to respond.
Created own answers from B’s statement re pants.
Asking 4 questions at once at 11m mark.
12m B states she’s frightened of him and CPIU closed the question and answered because it upsets mummy etc.
10m B has to continue answering same questions.
15m11s B answers sometimes to daddy taking pants off and then putting them back on and CPIU finishes statement by claiming because sometimes they’re the only pants you have and closed question again with his entirely different answer.
18m35s B “nobody touches my tooshka, only daddy. And he presses it down. And it hurts”.
19m20s CPIU says does daddy only do it when he washes you? B says NO.
19m27s B says he does it all the time.
20m42s B told father it hurts and he father said nothing and kept wiping it.
22m37s B replies no to somebody else making her touch their penis. But answered in a more raised voice denoting not truth. Then says I am a good girl.
24m mark CW asks B if she feels safe at daddy’s. B said No.
Then CPIU says because he upsets ur mummy changing topic altogether and implying B said this because she is upset that her mum and dad fight. When in fact the question was a lot different to where he steered it to.
24m CPIU try coerce B to state good things at dads after telling her she is safe there and minimising all her disclosures or trying to trick her into different answers.
28m50s CPIU says u have right to feel safe around all people. B interjects and says NOT AROUND DADDYS. The stress her statement.
What a clusterf&%# of an interview.
Anonymous 4
I and my wife have followed this case being supporters of the Help Find Isabella and Bronte Watter page from the very beginning . No longer will this happen ! We remain on there however just to keep an eye on this man  . Having been associates/friends of the Watter family since before we even met Cassie via Michael , we were without a doubt GROOMED by the young man from the onset when the mother and her children went into hiding . We believed all that was said by him and whatever he presented to us by way of ” his ” evidence and supported him to the nth degree in all that he did . We shared all he shared on his page . We liked and commented in support of him finding his children . We swore blind he was innocent . All of this changed when we viewed the first interview and those following before it was blocked on you tube ( who by we do not know ) . As a result of those interviews we began to really study the evidence provided by the Free Missing Watter Twins page and cannot fathom why the people responsible for this case have not reopened it when there is blatant wrong doing by all concerned . As a police officer investigating the case  WHY would you not interview everybody concerned with this case . It is also our understanding that even the Poppy and Nana were not interviewed regarding the disclosures made to them ? We do believe that such blatant wrong doing will at some stage be righted and then maybe ( and we stress the word maybe ) the father will end up in jail but knowing the system as we do we believe he will get away with a reprimand as child rape is not an issue here in Townsville and appears to be common . We need a complete change in authority and need to get highly principled police officers in to replace those who are not . We will continue to pray for the mother and her children . 
WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

336 total views, 1 views today

Our page was hacked . Thank you Michael Watter and Government Departments ! #Leak84 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 84

We find the fact that our web page was hacked quite damning and a clear indication  there is a great deal to still be uncovered  where MICHAEL WATTER and the relevant authorities are concerned . Why do you think this would have happened Mr. MALCOLM TURNBULL ? Why do you think this would have happened Mr. GEORGE BRANDIS ? 

We also find the fact that You Tube has blocked the viewing of the interviews of the children due to a ” legal complaint ” to be indicative of cover ups and corruption at the highest level ! What do you think Queensland Police Commissioner IAN STEWART ?

There is a ” DEAFENING SILENCE ” at the highest level !

As they say in the classics ” THE TRUTH WILL ALWAYS OUT ” which is why we are here !

We are a voice for the children . We are a voice for the mother . 

No longer will MICHAEL WATTER get away with his lies and deceit !! No longer will he get away with his arrogance ! 

No longer will we allow corruption and cover ups at the highest level to continue .

We are republishing the brief of evidence below  . We have since refined it and tidied it up for presentation to the authorities but this presentation is in original format . The videos may be hidden from You Tube but they are NOT hidden in the presentation . The evidence is clear and concise .

The interesting part of the amended brief is a list of those news agencies and parliamentarians who have expressed concern and interest in what has happened and is happening and who have contacted us . What is of even more interest where members of parliament and senators are concerned , are the names of those who have not contacted us , which we will deal with going forward and make public ! In addition to this we will also make public a list of officials who have gone out of their way to prevent us publishing the facts !

Leading Cyber Investigator Final Facts and Statement

Since #WikiDetectives begun this investigation 6 months ago our research has found that the father ( MICHAEL WATTER ) is guilty of the claims by two girls and their mother .

Please review the #WikiDetectives evidence reports, and if you would like original footage or documents please call 1800-UNSEEN

Please review the footage of the missing twins claims ( you will be unable to view this footage for now but will be able to view in a different format soon )

https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=x_JSd_W5q4s

https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=W4YEJQNj9lI

https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=HmQI0z8QESQ

https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=Zvi_TTuuDvA

https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=is87WmM9WD0

https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=XGp3-vHyzEY

https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=8mHMuvd-ghg

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4Ydon9Fdh_-SHRmZzRzRmNseUk/view?usp=drive_web

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4Ydon9Fdh_-UTQzS0xYd0RZb2s/view?usp=drive_web

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4Ydon9Fdh_-eWlqVjRhRGpSd28/view?usp=drive_web

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4Ydon9Fdh_-RTRVT0NaOEEzNTQ/view?usp=drive_web

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4Ydon9Fdh_-NWJsUGNKX3dWYjg/view?usp=drive_web

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4Ydon9Fdh_-cW1aR1ZEWmlSbkk/view?usp=drive_web

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4Ydon9Fdh_-cUF3TFIyUW1mb1U/view?usp=drive_web

http://bit.ly/pamela-report

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4Ydon9Fdh_-LXJyNkhtc1dfdlk/view?usp=drive_web

http://bit.ly/handwritten-report

http://wikidetectives.com.au/twins/leak45/

Summary – Corruption and Cover Ups !

1. Police failed to investigate allegations of child sexual abuse and operated at the outset from the premise that the mother had trained the children to make false reports .

2. The children sought help from 12 people — NONE of them were interviewed .

3. The mother only had supervised contact with her children and yet police accused her of “training “ them to make the reports .

4. Detective Sgt David Miles and Officer Michelle Faint bullied the mother , told her that the father had never abused the children and never would ( an assurance that no responsible professional would ever give ) .

5. They acted as quasi-psychologists and threatened to charge the mother (who was director of a paediatric health centre)  with an undisclosed offence if she examined her daughters genitals.

6.  Miles said that police would never investigate any further disclosures of abuse , as a result of which the father would know that that he could do whatever he liked and police would not intervene .

7. Detective Miles ordered the mother to respond to future allegations of abuse by telling the children that it was ‘just a dream ‘.

8. It was later revealed that the idea of the dream came from police , not the child and , furthermore , both of the twins disclosed sexual abuse

9. Prof . Freda Briggs lodged formal complaint with Queensland Crime and Misconduct Commission  . The complaint was accepted . Prof . Freda Briggs concerned that a Brisbane Police Inspector , Craig Weatherly was appointed to investigate my complaint against fellow police  . Concern expressed that the inspector was unlikely to have the expertise to judge the developmentally inappropriate language that was used when interviewing children of this age .

10. Cassie Watter contacted Prof . Freda Briggs with the news that one of her children had a sexually transmitted infection which the father had previously passed onto her . She also found that one of the girls had a damaged and bleeding anus which was reported to Brisbane Inspector Weatherly . His response to Briggs was that he was trying to arrange mediation for the mother and Detective Miles while admitting that this was unlikely to be successful .

11. A year later Detective Miles was found to be still responsible for child protection as he was the spokesperson responding to media when the mother and children disappeared .

12. Letter sent to Premier in 2014 by Briggs pointing out fact that the following had been reported to the Crime and misconduct commission –  very serious complaints against Townsville Police Det Sgt David Miles , Michelle Faint and the child safety officer who ignored the children’s disclosures of sexual abuse by their father , bullied them and their mother and left the  5 year old children alone in a room for an hour .. all of this captured on CCTV . NO action was taken .

13. The police ( illegally ) banned the mother from making further reports of abuse ( ignoring Briggs’ reports ) threatened to arrest the mother for examining her daughter’s genitals and ignored a sexually transmitted infection and torn anus , reporting abuse by the father and his influential friends to 12 witnesses who were never interviewed .

14. The relationship between police and the father is such that the father received a copy of Briggs’ complaint ( which was not about him ) , put it on the internet and wrote offensive emails to Briggs .

15. Briggs met the police officer responsible for the inquiry and he said that his report was completed at the end of 2013 . It has disappeared .

16. The Commissioner of CCC said that he would trace it and contact Briggs . That did not happen .

17. The Minister for children refused to see Briggs on the grounds of ‘privacy ‘.

18. Briggs informed by a reliable source that the Minister proclaims that ‘ the father is innocent ‘ and the mother is mentally ill .

19. Briggs said she wished to discuss her complaint , not the case in question . The Minister refused .

20. There were 93 reports written by 13 contact supervisors :-  Rae Greaves , Lynette Bartlett , R.M Bartled , Rhonda Lane , Hollie Malardi , Virginia Hall , Maureen Land , Mathew Morrison ,Wendy Williams , Wendy Willcox , Alex Dronysius , Karin Carmichael ,  Norm Land .

21. The children made frequent disclosures of sexual abuse by their father to thirteen different people :- Their mother , Their maternal grandmother , Family friend Patricia Plasted , Family friend Desiree Taylor , Psychologist Caroline Seri , GP Dr.Rebecca McGoweng ,Occupational therapist Lucy Dall-Albah , Family friend Christine Young and the following independent supervisors  , Lynette Bartlett ,Rhonda Lane , Rae Greaves , Virginia Hallm and  Hollie Mallardi . NO interviews conducted !

22. Disclosures included :-

  1. The father rubbing his penis against the vaginas of the 5 year old twins and making them sore
  2. The father ”playing “with his penis
  3. His penis went stiff when the child had to play with it
  4. The father telling the children that the game was a secret
  5. The father telling the children that police cannot be trusted
  6. The father being angry because the children had reported being abused

22. A serious concern is that neither police nor child safety officers charged with investigating this case appear to have read or taken account of the reports of the thirteen named people . It is especially a concern that they ignored the reports made by professionals such as psychologist Caroline Seri who , a former employee of the Child Safety Department , thought the evidence sufficiently serious to report child sexual abuse to the authorities . She sent a copy of a child’s sexually explicit drawing with the child’s statement that daddy placed his penis between her legs .

23.  Police and safety officers also appear to have ignored the report of psychiatrist Dr. Satish Karunakaran (27.10.2012) who says quite clearly that

a. “ the father had custody of the children for more than 95% of the time and it seems strange to me that the Department is pointing the finger at Catherine ( the mother ) for her children’s abnormal behaviour given that she has had relatively little time with the children “ . The mother’s contact with the children had been supervised by independent supervisors and her behaviour was critiqued and reported .

b. “the notion that Catherine’s obsession with the matter ( i.e. sexual abuse by the father ) and repeated inspections and questioning of the children may have caused her children’s sexualised behaviours is unlikely . Moreover such questioning and inspections are unlikely to result in the observed behaviours “.

The psychiatrist also criticised the Department of Child Safety for failing to provide an assessment of the children by a specialist child psychiatrist .

24. Police with the child safety officer attempted to put themselves in the role of psychologists to justify their support of the father’s innocence and the mother’s guilt and their statements and explanations are garbled and bizarre .They said that the children make disclosures of abuse because their mother provides comfort . There is no evidence of this in the supervisor’s detailed reports on her parental behaviour .The mother and children enjoy a mutually affectionate relationship but, when disclosures were made , the mother distracted them . At the taped meeting with police and the child safety officer , the mother is condemned for distracting them saying that she should have questioned them further ; at the same time , they illogically claimed that her questioning of the children ( for which there is no evidence in the reports made by the contact supervisors ) caused emotional damage which , in turn , resulted in problematic sexual behaviours and repeated disclosures .

25. The children persisted in making disclosures of abuse because the trusted adults who received them were unable to stop the behaviour they complained of .When something is very worrying to young children they will persist in repeating their complaint to try to convince trusted adults that they need help . The fact that no-one stopped the unwanted and worrying behaviour would have led to the children’s persistence in making reports .

26.Why have Child Safety and CPIU officers refused to interview or accept reports from the court approved supervisors ?

27. Why have the supervisor’s reports of disclosures of sexual abuse by the father Michael Watter to the girls been forwarded to the Independent Children’s lawyer and then sent onwards directly to the father ? This then gave the paedophile father Michael Watter the opportunity to persecute the girls for what they had been saying and ALSO allow him to coach them on what to say and what not to say !

28. Has the I.C.L interviewed the supervisors with regard to the girls disclosures ?

29. Has the I.C.L. ( Independent Children’s Lawyer ( so called Independent ) interviewed anyone on behalf of the children she was supposedly representing ?

30. Michael Watter did NOT agree to take the girls to doctors even when advised by the supervisors that they needed to be seen by a doctor . He also would NOT allow the girls any counselling with a Child Psychologist when he had custody of them even though they had been separated from their mother the primary care giver most of their lives .

31. There is further correspondence from Freda Briggs to Craig Weatherly informing him she had been abused by the paedophile father Michael Watter on the telephone when she hadn’t given him the telephone number . Freda asked if the police had given him her number ? Craig Weatherly was also informed that she ( Freda ) had lodged a formal complaint with the police 16 months prior to this to which there had been no response or answer as usual ! Freda informed him that she was told the report on the abuse of the child should have been published that November and as of July the following year nothing had been done !

32. Craig Weatherly was also asked at the same time why a copy of Freda’s complaint to the Crime and Misconduct Commission ( the complaint being about the behaviour of the police ) had been given to the paedophile father Michael Watter by the police ?

33. There were three break ins at Cassie’s work and home and the only items taken were the children’s medical records , legal papers relating to the case and Cassie’s achievement awards — why don’t you ask Craig Weatherly how they are proceeding with their investigations on this matter !

34. Why were there no support people allowed for the children when they were interviewed !

35. Judge John Coker removed the children from Cassie and gave them over to Michael KNOWING that there was a Domestic Violence Order in place to protect the children and Cassie from Michael .

36. The police doing the interview tell the children that they may say what they like in the interview room and they would not be punished for anything they said and the police did not take into account the fact ( or perhaps they did ) that the children might have been punished later after going home to their father .

37. There was no Child Safety person with Isabella when she was interviewed .

38. Supervisors reported that the girls said that their Daddy had said that if they tell the police about their “secret “game that they would be taken away from Mummy and Daddy .

39. The police have used details from the supervisor’s reports to question the girls and yet the supervisors were not interviewed so they could give their side or explain their notes .

40. The children had sexually transmitted vaginal infections and one of them had a bleeding anus ! So where do you think these injuries came from ?

41. Bronte disclosed to LUCY DALL ‘ ALBA the occupational therapist that Michael Watter rubbed her vagina through her pyjamas !

42. Isabella disclosed to Patricia Plaistead and the mother , asking that they ask the father Michael Watter , to PLEASE STOP playing with her private parts when he collects her !

43. Isabella disclosed to Carolyn Seri the psychiatrist by drawing a picture of Isabella and her father with genitals and said he ( Michael Watter ) rubs her down there with his genitals and that it was just pretend !

44. Bronte disclosed to Christine Young that Daddy tickled her on the front of her bottom whilst she was not wearing pants —called him “naughty Daddy “

45. Bronte again disclosed to Christine that Michael tickled them on their vaginas although Michael said he would not touch their private parts anymore .

46. Bronte disclosed to Christine that the father Michael Watter told them ( the twins ) that he would get into big trouble if the girls told anyone all the naughty things he had done . Cassie asked what the naughty things were and was told by Bronte that Michael tickled their Tooshkas on lots of different days in bed or on the couch and the toilet . Isabella said he would take the covers off her to enable him to tickle her vagina .

47. Bronte drew a picture of herself sitting on the toilet with Michael next to her and said Michael tickled her Tooshka whilst on the toilet . Cassie asked her if he was just wiping her bottom to which she responded that sometimes he did but sometimes he did naughty stuff !

48. They called their father a “Baboon tickling tooshka super hero “ because he is a baboon and he tickles their tooshkas on the couch and bed and Isabella said that is what a baboon tickling tooshka super hero does !

49. Bronte was crying and disclosed to the mother her vagina and bottom were sore and when the mother called the grandmother , Heather Doubleday , further disclosed that Isabella refused to play with Michael’s private parts . Bronte locked herself and Isabella in the bedroom to be safe from Michael . She further stated that they were playing the tickling tooshka game and that when they did that the father was no longer angry and laughed and laughed !

50. Isabella stated “Daddy tickled my vagina again today Mum “ Said he had made Bronte go rest in her room and then took her to his room and then tickled her under the arms , on her nipples and then her tummy and vagina . She asked him to stop but he didn’t .He asked her to play with his penis and she said no so he played with it himself . Isabella ended the conversation by saying she was telling the truth and then soiled her swimmers !!

51.Isabella told her mother AGAIN that the father makes her take her pants off so that he can play with her vagina . Said he makes her do it when Bronte is in the other room and she wasn’t to tell Daddy as he would get angry with her .

52. Isabella disclosed that Michael Watter had made her tooshkla sore again and she soiled her swimmers again . In the bathroom she showed her mother where he hurt her and the vagina was red and raw ! When Cassie asked if she could put cream on it she said know as she was scared as Michael would know and would be angry . Bronte lay down as well and pointed to her clitoris and said “this is where he plays with me and it doesn’t hurt see “

53. Bronte disclosed to the mother and Desiree Taylor that daddy had said not to talk to the police because they were not her friends and Isabella said that when Daddy played with her private parts his would stand up ! She said he had a video of it on his phone .

54.Isabella told the mother and Rae Greaves ( supervisor ) that Daddy used to play with hers and Bronte’s vaginas but did not any longer . Rae Greaves asked Isabella again if this was correct and she said YES using sign language .

55. Isabella disclosed to the mother and Virginia Hall (supervisor) that when she played with Daddy’s penis that it stands up and is scary !

56. Isabella stated in front of Rae Greaves ( supervisor )that Daddy still played with her vagina and that if she told he gets very angry with her 

57. Isabella stated to Cassie and Rae Greaves that Daddy will still not tell the truth and that he still plays the rude game and that he told them to say it was Cassie but that was a lie !

58. Bronte told Virginia Hall and Cassie that they had to play with Daddy’s private parts again .

59. Isabella said to Virginia and Cassie that Bronte still goes to Daddy’s room to play with his private parts .

60. Interesting that only ONE supervisor out of all the people that the children disclosed to has ever been interviewed !

61. There was an admission by the Queensland Police Service that previous interviews were not conducted in accordance to the Queensland Police Service requirements , to the extent that two senior officers were required to undergo re-training . The poor original interviews of the children may have led to a miscarriage of justice or at least to circumstances where the courts were not provided with the true facts of this case

62. Note the psychologist’s ( Seri ) recommendation that the children remain with the mother ! THEN ALSO NOTE the fact that the judge totally ignored this recommendation and placed the children with their paedophile father !

63. Letter to Inspector C. Scanlon- NO reply

64. Child disclosure of sexual abuse reported to two doctors ! Neither interviewed ! WHY would that be do you think ?

65. Child Safety gathered NO evidence from the witnesses that the allegations of sexual abuse were made!

66. ELEVEN further notifications of sexual abuse were made against Michael Watter by the children whilst he had full custody  

67. Michael Watter was able to access Legal Aid whilst earning a salary of $80 000 . 00 plus benefits . Is this not fraud ?

68. The mother was unable to access Legal Aid whilst being forced into insolvency trying to protect her children !

69.  Dallas Grant a previous employee of the Child Safety Department was commenting on Michael Watter’s “ Help Find Isabella and Bronte Watter’s page “ shows no bias does it ?

70.  Cassie had visited and been assessed by 2 Psychiatrists and 4 Psychologists with all of them clearing her of any mental disorder !

71. A Sitting State Member ( who wished to remain anonymous ) stated that Michael Watter’s   UNCLE —  Mark McArdle MP Member for Caloundra (LNP) , would not want to be known to be publicly involved in any way with the case as it would tarnish his reputation !

72. One would have to ask if this man’s position in any way enabled Michael Watter on a salary of $80000 plus a year to utilise the taxpayer to fund his lies and deceit ?

73. Michael Watter posted a copy of the court ruling on his page in spite of Section 121 of the Family Law Act and has never been charged !

74.  Queensland Police Commissioner Ian Stewart ‘ s Twitter account has been used to comment and communicate with Michael Watter on this is nothing short of a disgrace – to the extent that Senator David Leyonhjelm picked up on it , criticised the Commissioner and suggested the Commissioner should resign

75. Michael Watter gave his child a sexually transmitted disease !

76. “ Sgt. Miles is a liar or imcompetent or an incompetent liar “ ( Freda Briggs )

77. Police Commissioner Ian Stewart — How can someone who professes to be a professional policeman MAKE A JUDGEMENT on a case where he admits to :-

  • NOT having viewed tapes of a police interview between one of his officers , child safety and the mother ?
  • NOT viewed the interview between the children and the the police ,child safety ?
  • REFUSES to accept the analysis by a qualified individual of the interview , said interview not having been watched by himself ?
  • NOT having read any of the supervisor’s reports of abuse by the father ?
  • NOT having viewed ANY of the other police and child safety interviews of the girls ?
  • What an abject display of ignorance by this so called leader Ian Stewart !
  • The fact that a child , has a sexually transmitted infection and a bleeding anus is of NO concern to Stewart
  • The Minister for Child Safety Hon Shannon Fentiman MP and Michael Hogan the Director General of  Communities ( including Child Safety )  promise to do something and then do nothing to fulfil their promises . Indicative of all that is wrong with the child protection system !

78. http://wikidetectives.com.au/twins/we-are-waiting-mr-turnbull-leak73-wikidetectives/

79. Mr. Turnbull, we have in our possession a letter which states that both of the girls spoke “ about gunk coming out of their vaginas  “   and the fact that one had blood coming out of her anus !!!!!

80. Why have the Heilbronns ( a family of known drug dealers ) have so much pull and say with the police and child safety ?

81. Just so there are no misunderstandings — so far in this case we have :-

  • Gross inefficiency and bias of Det. Sgt. David Miles !
  • Gross inefficiency and bias of Officer Michelle Feint !
  • Gross inefficiency and bias of Child Protection Officer Merle McNulty !
  • Gross inefficiency , bias and bullying by Child Safety Officer Gaynor Williams !
  • Complete and utter negligence AND bullying by Queensland Police Commissioner Ian Stewart ! An incompetent officer who had read nothing to do with the case back then , watched none of the interviews , hasn’t queried his officers as to why none of the parties the child sexual abuse was disclosed to had  been interviewed and yet had the cheek to determine the findings and to question the veracity of the grandparents , professionals and the like !
  • Inspector Craig Weatherley gets an honourable mention
  • Obvious negligence by the Minister for Child Safety Hon. Shannon Fentiman MP !
  • Obvious negligence by the North Queensland Director for Communities , Sandra Moore ( took over from Lupi ) !
  • Obvious negligence displayed by the Regional Director of Child Safety Nicola Jeffers !
  • Obvious negligence displayed by the Regional Director Communities , Matthew Lupi !
  • The Crime and Misconduct Commission have done nothing to extol their own virtues have they ? A misnomer if ever there was one !
  • The Commission for Child and and Young People and Guardians – interesting title as we see nothing from them as to what they have done to protect the little girls !
  • Continuous cover ups by all !
  • To say nothing about personal involvement of the uncle  Mark McArdle MP
WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

634 total views, 1 views today

More correspondence/evidence ! #Leak83 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 83

MICHAEL WATTER , we will refrain from commenting on ALL posts from now on as we believe they speak for themselves !

You , the public , need to read BOTH PIECES OF CORRESPONDENCE and make your own minds up as to who is at fault and where the blame lies for the cover ups and inaction regarding this case .  You decide if the police need to be looked at here . You decide if Child Safety has done their job . 

We have the relevant copies of this correspondence and the attachments referred to just in case MICHAEL WATTER thinks they are figments of our imagination !

A PUBLIC RE INVESTIGATION is URGENTLY needed Mr. TURNBULL to enable the freedom of these children and to allow them the counselling that  and is so desperately needed !

 

From: Freda Briggs
Sent: Friday, 1 August 2014 8:06 AM
To: ‘Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services’
Cc: Recipient 1 . Recipient 2 .
Subject: re the Watter twins

Dear Minister

I contacted the Premier and yourself about this case some time ago. In fact, a letter from the premier on the 24th April asked me to make an appointment to meet with you when I am next in Brisbane.

I will be there for one day only on September 2nd  but am giving a lecture for the medical profession on October 18th and could come earlier.

I wrote to inform you of my concerns relating to the Watter children from Townsville who are in hiding with their mother. The magistrate has stated that she will be jailed when found and the children will be returned to their father.

Sixteen months ago, I sent a detailed complaint to the Queensland Crimes & Misconduct Commission about the mishandling of this incest case by Townsville Police Detective Sgt David Miles and Michelle Faint.  I was expert adviser to the mother’s lawyers and had access to all DVD interviews.

Townsville Police dismissed reports of incest as a child dreaming about having sex with her father at the age of two. According to them, this would have caused both children to ask at least a dozen people for help when they were aged 4- 7years. Police bullying of the mother on some 46 pages of transcript was so appalling that a discourse analyst  was asked to examine it.  The result of her analysis is being published by two professional journals… one by an international university and the other for the legal profession with the assistance of a magistrate.

The QCMC  engaged Inspector Craig Weatherley (Brisbane)to investigate my complaint. That concerned me because Inspector Weatherley is not an expert in child development or what would have been appropriate language to use for the stage of development of the Watter twins.  He told me that I would receive a response last November. I didn’t. He did concede that the interviewing police had concocted the idea of a 2 year old dreaming about sex and suggested it to one of the children. Police banned the mother from looking at her daughter’s genitals and banned her from reporting further evidence of abuse. When she discovered that one of the girls had a Sexually Transmitted Infection and a torn anus,  I reported this to Craig Weatherley because the mother was banned from reporting it to Townsville Police. His response to me, in writing, was that there should be mediation between the mother and Detective Sgt Miles. That is why she fled with the children.

A few days ago I received an email and an angry phone call from the father, Michael Watter, revealing that he had seen a copy of my complaint to QCMC relating to Townsville Police and  he had been given my private phone number. I wrote to  Inspector Weatherley seeking an explanation for this. He has not responded.

Today I received the email below which suggests corruption at the highest levels. The writer is a Doctor in psychology.

In the meantime Detective Sgt Miles remains responsible for child protection in Townsville and he has appeared on media

I hope that you will support an inquiry into this horrendous case.

Yours sincerely

Dr Freda Briggs AO

Emeritus Professor in Child Development

University of South Australia

Magill Campus

SA 5072

Tel 08 83794926

From: Recipient 1 .
Date: 31 July 2014 3:39:05 pm AEST
To: Recipient 3 . Recipient 4 .

I have approached the Queensland Attorney General requesting a Judicial enquiry into the conduct of the Townsville Police ( especially the Inspector in charge and Sargent Miles as well as the two police officers who interviewed Cassie Watters along with Bronte and Isabella ) , the Director and staff of The  Department of Child Safety in Townsville , along with the Magistrate and staff of the Townsville Family Court

As the attached reports show…. over 100 reports handed into the family court by various individuals , including the girls GP , a child physiologist ,Court appointed Supervisors and others , have not been investigated by either the police or staff at DOCS

There are claims that Michael Watters,the Inspector of Police and the Director of Docs have met weekly for meals and drinks for more than 4 years , and that they were often joined by the magistrate of the Family Court

Also Michael Watters uncle is a senior member of the Q’ld Government and allegations are being made that he instructed Police and Docs to ignore the claims of Cassie Watters re the sexual abuse as she was mentally unstable and was coaching the girls in making these claims

All Cassie’s times with her girls over the past 2 years at least, have been in the presence of Court appointed supervisors ,non of whom has heard Cassie in any way do such a thing

The first person to whom the girls spoke regarding the sexual abuse was their maternal grandmother who saw also the inflamed genitals of the girls when giving them a bath when they were only 5 years of age. She was not allowed to testify in the family court

Others also have witnessed the inflamation over the past 4 years and reported this to authorities,and these reports have been ignored

Some months before the girls disappeared , the girls said that ” daddy now allows Mr Steve to do it to us ” as a thank you for his help

Just before the disappearance the girls complained of the pain of penetration . A week or so before Cassie and the girls left Townsville, Cassie received a call from the girls’ doctor, requesting a fresh stool sample from one of the girls. She asked why , and was told that the stool was required to help determine why she was bleeding from the bowel

As I review all this… I cannot help believing that criminal defamation has been undertaken by officials in Townsville , to achieve the non-belief in anything Cassie Watters has claimed

I also believe that officials in Townsville have colluded to achieve a miscarriage of justice and should face criminal charges

Please read all the reports and do what you can to help achieve justice for Cassie Watters and her two girls

Thank you

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

294 total views, no views today

Please help the children Mr. Turnbull ! #FreeMissingTwins #PressStatement14

Yes , MICHAEL WATTER .

Just so there are no misunderstandings — so far in this case we have :-

Gross inefficiency and bias of Det. Sgt. David Miles !

Gross inefficiency and bias of Officer Michelle Feint !

Gross inefficiency and bias of Child Protection Officer Merle McNulty !

Gross inefficiency , bias and bullying by Child Safety Officer Gaynor Williams !

Complete and utter negligence AND bullying by Queensland Police Commissioner Ian Stewart ! An incompetent officer who had read nothing to do with the case back then , watched none of the interviews , hasn’t queried his officers as to why none of the parties the child sexual abuse was disclosed to had  been interviewed and yet had the cheek to determine the findings and to question the veracity of the grandparents , professionals and the like !

Inspector Craig Weatherley gets an honourable mention but more about him later .

Obvious negligence by the Minister for Child Safety Hon. Shannon Fentiman MP !

Obvious negligence by the North Queensland Director for Communities , Sandra Moore ( took over from Lupi ) !

Obvious negligence displayed by the Regional Director of Child Safety Nicola Jeffers !

Obvious negligence displayed by the Regional Director Communities , Matthew Lupi !

The Crime and Misconduct Commission have done nothing to extol their own virtues have they ? A misnomer if ever there was one !

The Commission for Child and and Young People and Guardians – interesting title as we see nothing from them as to what they have done to protect the little girls !

Continuous cover ups by all !

 Please MICHAEL WATTER , help us fill in the blanks !!! – your Uncle’s name – oh no , sorry , don’t worry , we have that , — Mark McArdle MP

Friends list – oh sorry again – we have all of those ! Perhaps you can help us with the names of :-

 Your cricketing mates ?

Your rugby mates ?

Your golfing mates ?

Your Rotary mates ?

Those names would be appreciated , just so we can keep those we have missed in previous correspondence , up to date .

Oh and one final SORRY ! Did we mention that one of your so called close mates has been corresponding with us and putting in a good word for you ?We didn’t ? How remiss of us !

 As a round up we wish to reconfirm that there were 93 reports written by 13 contact supervisors :-

  1. Rae Greaves
  2. Matthew Morrison
  3. R.M Bartlett
  4. Rhonda Lane
  5. Hollie Malardi
  6. Virginia Hall
  7. Maureen Land
  8. Mathew Morrison
  9. Wendy Williams
  10. Wendy Willcox
  11. Alex Dronysius
  12. Karin Carmichael
  13. Norm Land

 

Not one of these reports MR. TURNBULL , were seen by your Police Commissioner for Queensland , Ian Stewart ! You may rest assured he will be studying them now as if he is about to write an exam on which his job rests ( which it does ) and should know this case backwards once a decision has been made to PUBLICLY RE INVESTIGATE !!!

 

Frequent disclosures of sexual abuse by the father MICHAEL WATTER were reported to 14 different people i.e.

 Their mother Cassie Watter

Their maternal grandmother Heather Doubleday

Their paternal grandfather Arthur Doubleday

Family friend Patricia Plasted

Family friend Desiree Taylor

Psychologist Caroline Seri

GP Dr.Rebecca McGowen

Occupational therapist Lucy Dall-Alba

Family friend Christine Young

 

( Not one of these reports was read by Ian Stewart but , once again , you may rest assured MR. TURNBULL that he will know the answers backwards to any of the questions put to him now ! )

 

and the following independent supervisors ;

 

Lynette Bartlett

Rhonda Lane

Rae Greaves

Virginia Hall

Hollie Mallardi

 

Do we need to refresh your memory again MR. TURNBULL ?

 

Now MR. MALCOLM TURNBULL , do you, not think , that consistent disclosures of child sexual abuse by the children , to the number of people mentioned above , might perhaps mean that the said disclosures are or were credible ? Do you not also think that the persistent disclosures to numerous people continued because none of the trusted adults by way of the police and child protection did anything to stop the abuse ? Just a thought MR. TURNBULL !

These children disclosed the following ( amongst MANY other disclosures )  :-

The father MICHAEL WATTER rubbing his penis against their vaginas and making them sore !

The father MICHAEL WATTER ” playing “with his penis ! Only because they did not understand the word ‘Masturbation’

The father MICHAEL WATTER’S penis going stiff when the children had to play with it !

The father MICHAEL WATTER telling the children that the game was a secret !

The father MICHAEL WATTER telling the children that police cannot be trusted !

The father MICHAEL WATTER being angry because the children had reported being abused !

The father MICHAEL WATTER playing with their vaginas whilst on the toilet !

The father MICHAEL WATTER using his little girls to masturbate himself !

 MR. TURNBULL , ALL of the above is consistent with child victimization as is evidenced by researched literature readily available , research with multiple victims and offenders , and YET none of the esteemed police and child safety officers took any notice or took into account the reports from the named 13 people !!!

Do you not think MR. TURNBULL that at the very least these named people should have been investigated by the police and Child Safety ?

Do you not think MR. TURNBULL that the Queensland Police Commissioner Ian Stewart should be ordered to RE INVESTIGATE these complaints or are you personally happy with the quality of the case attended to so far ?In fact we suggest you do nothing of the sort ! We do NOT want police investigating police -we want a PUBLIC RE INVESTIGATION so there are NO more cover ups !

Do you not think MR. TURNBULL that reports and affidavits by qualified personnel , the likes of , Psychologist Caroline Seri ( a former employee of Child Safety ) , should have more attention paid to them , particularly when a copy of a drawing done by one of the children , of her father MICHAEL WATTER , placing his penis between her legs , is sent to the police ? Seriously , MR. TURNBULL , do you approve of the conduct of your police in this case ? If not then DO SOMETHING ! If you do  then DO NOTHING as is the case at the moment !

 We are as prepared to pay for your telephone call to get the ball rolling as Julian Assange is to pay for your taxi fare to the Ecuadorian Embassy !

 MR. TURNBULL , There are numerous reports by psychiatrists and psychologists that have been totally IGNORED by Child Safety and the Police ! Do you think that this is reasonable considering the fact that this case involves two young girls who have been raped by their father MICHAEL WATTER and given a sexually transmitted infection previously passed onto their mother ? This fact alone should make you sit up in HORROR and want to do something to deal with this injustice ! OR maybe not !

 

Finally , MR. TURNBULL , only YOU can help free the Watter twins and bring them back to safety  !

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

200 total views, no views today

Questionable and dubious friends ! #Leak79 #WikiDetectives

 

 

 

LEAK 79

 

Questions and Statements

We have met the Heilbronns on only two occasions. Once at Michael’s birthday party and we hardly had any conversation with them and then again at a football match where we only said, ‘Hello.’ They arrived at our home, unannounced, on the afternoon of 8th October 2011 and immediately began their barrage of abuse towards Cassie, Heather & I, accusing Cassie of verbalizing the girls and Heather & I of being inadequate parents and grandparents. They had also only known Michael for just over two years. How did they come to the conclusion that we were bad parents when they didn’t even know us or any other member of our family? We have had all of our children thank us, at some stage of their adult life, of giving them a good, active, busy and interesting childhood and also directing them wisely so as to keep them from making wrong decisions.

Stephen Heilbronn – chef- caterer

  1. Told us on 8th October 2011 to, ‘Get Cassie & girls back to Michael or I will have the children removed to Michael’s care. I will make a complaint to Child Safety and ensure that Cassie will have the girls removed from her care within a week.’
  2. Told Cassie that she should not have gone to Relationships Australia for counseling but should have consulted him.
  3. Claimed that violence, yelling obscenities and punching holes in walls is normal behavior in most homes.
  4. The Heilbronns also said in their Affidavit that they had not said and done what they did.
  5. Sheree Heilbronn – teacher? We believe has only taught for approximately 2 years during the past 9 years.

 

  1. Michael taped all conversations in our home in an attempt to get us to make controversial statements which he then could use in his affidavit. Attempting to pervert the course of justice?
  2. Cassie, Heather & I, Arthur Doubleday, have never accused Michael of sexually interfering with the girls. The accusations have only ever come from both Isabella & Bronte. It has always been, ‘Daddy did—’ or ‘Daddy said—‘, never ‘Mummy told us to say—
WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

179 total views, no views today

Time to have a look at this Mr. Turnbull ? #Leak 78 #WikiDetectives

 

LEAK 78

Why have the police never gotten back to the Grandfather ?

Why would Det Sgt David Miles refuse to take a statement ?

Why would Gaynor Williams from Child Safety do nothing ?

Why would she attempt to conceal her real name ?

Note this little man’s abuse and threats to an elderly couple ! Normally he only abuses little children ! Stepping up a notch was he ?

Why no reply from Commission for Children & Young People & Guardians ?

Note MICHAEL WATTER was able to access Legal Aid in spite of being on a salary of +/- $ 80 000 per annum – we the taxpayer had to foot the bill for this ! Is this not fraud ?

Note the infringements by MICHAEL WATTER and friends relating to instructions from the court and yet nothing done about it ! Nothing suspect about that is there ?

Note the competence of the police in Townsville when the domestic and office premises of the mother were broken into — on all occasions, only documents, relating to the children’s medical records, legal documents, a mobile phone and a couple of laptops were taken —  would be really interesting to read the police procedure and the success of their investigations on these cases don’t you think ?

Note the grandparents do not have a problem with the judiciary — we do  !

Note the mention of bruising around the mother’s throat , arms and legs – perhaps she tried to strangle herself MICHAEL WATTER ?

Note that this brave little man only abuses his own children , an elderly couple AND bashes the dog ! What wonderful attributes this coward has !

Note the efficiency of C.P.I.U. at all times – NOT !

You must be very happy to see how well your government departments are running Mr. Turnbull ?

It is good to see there is not a hint of corruption or inefficiency anywhere within the system ! What do you think Mr. Turnbull ?

A mother and two children in hiding Mr. Turnbull because YOU appear to be more than happy with the system !

 

No reason for a   PUBLIC  RE INVESTIGATION    Mr. Turnbull , is there ?

 

 

The Crime & Misconduct Commission

Ref: M1-13-2646-13/143078

24th April 2014

Att: Mr Bilsborough

 

Dear Sir,

As you are aware, we drove up from Warragul in Victoria, to deliver to yourselves evidence in relation to the allegations made by Bronte & Isabella Watter of their father’s sexual, physical and verbal abuse to them. We were not aware that the C.M.C. does not interview complainants. At the time, I gave a very brief outline of the case to you and was informed that the C.M.C. would contact me, thus expecting to be given the opportunity to present our evidence, in person, to someone. It was unfortunate that this was not the case. (Attached here is the evidence to be investigated.)

We have attempted to contact the police on five different occasions, to report abuse and on each occasion we were told that someone would ‘get back to us’, which never occurred. On 17th Jan 2013, I phoned Det. Snr. Sarg. David Miles, who again refused to take our statement, (The transcript of that conversation is attached).

Our attempts to contact Child Safety were also met with the same response, though on 17th Jan 2013, we had an interview with Ms Gaynor.(transcript attached) You will note that Child Safety refused to accept sexual abuse allegations by referring us to the C.P.I.U. I asked Ms Gaynor her name a few times and on each occasion she said it was Ms Gaynor. We found out later that her name is actually Ms Gaynor Williams.

We visited the Human Rights Commission, in Sydney, on 14th October 2013, who were extremely concerned but the matter was not in their Charter so referred us to the C.M.C. (copy attached)

On 1st October 2012 we complained to the Commission for Children & Young People & Guardians. We did not receive a reply. (Copy attached)

No doubt the C.M.C. is aware that Mrs. Watter has taken the children and disappeared, a crime that carries a prison term, which we accept. We had no idea of her plans to disappear or where she is at present.

On 4th April 2014 at about 6:30pm and after the police had been to our home to inform us of the disappearance of Cassie and the girls, I phoned Mr Watter only to be threatened with violence and jail, if we did not return the girls to his care immediately. I just told him that we didn’t know that they had gone until the police had informed us and also that we had no idea where they could be but he continued his verbal assault so I terminated the call. Mr Watter immediately phoned back to continue his threats of violence and abuse to my wife and I. These threats of abuse and bullying were reported to police. The police officer duly phoned Mr Watter and instructed him to cease the threats immediately.

Mr Michael Watter informed us, two years ago, that his position at Kinnect Health carried a salary of $85 000.00 P/A plus a car yet Mr Watter was able to obtained Legal Aid to subpoena us to Court. This was on two occasions for questioning over the disappearance of the children. In relation to the abduction, the C.P.I.U. or police have not taken statements from us or visited our home.

Mr Watter and his friends have embarked on a vicious campaign to discredit us, Mrs. Watter and her friends.(copies attached) Justice Tree of the Federal Family Court, made it very clear to Mr Watter and us that this case should not be aired in the public arena. Mr Watter, his family and friends appear to have gone beyond the Court restrictions on these matters, especially on social media. We believe this should be addressed and if appropriate Mr. Watter, as well as his family and friends should be charged.

On Sat. May 10th, the day before Mothers Day, we received a phone call from a florist who requested a suitable time for a delivery the next day for a ‘special’ delivery for my wife, Heather. I informed this person that we would be home in the morning but planned to be out for lunch and the rest of the afternoon. The caller seemed to be more interested about when we would be out, rather than home. We became suspicious and subsequently cancelled our arrangements for the next day. No flowers were delivered but, at 11:40am, a metallic grey Nissan X-Trail pulled up opposite our home and parked. When I walked out towards the gate the car sped off then, at 11:50am, Mr Watter came slowly past, whilst looking in. He was driving his red Alfa Romeo. When he noted that we were home he also sped off. Just after 1:00pm, the Nissan returned and pulled up, this time on our side of the road, at the entrance to our driveway and when I again walked out, it sped off. I reported these incidents to C.P.I.U. who simply said that they would talk to Michael.

Mrs. Watter’s residence at 48 Eyre Street North Ward has been subjected to break & enter offences, at least twice. Her business (Child Health & Development Centre) was also subjected to a break & enters offence where a bank safe was removed from its location, taken to another section of the building, and smashed beyond repair. On all occasions, only documents, relating to the children’s medical records, legal documents, a mobile phone and a couple of laptops were taken. No arrests have ever been made in relation to any of these offences.

We wish to make it very clear that we do not have a problem with the judiciary as Justice Tree has gone to extreme lengths to explain everything in minute detail to us and is always extremely polite and kind.

We have known Mr Watter in excess of 16yrs and have witnessed his mental state deteriorate. He is now extremely volatile and cannot control his emotions. We have witnessed bruising around Mrs. Watter’s throat, on her upper arms and legs, on many occasions, during the past few years. Even their dog could not be left at home alone with Mr Watter as he would bash it if it made the slightest sound. The dog was brought around to our place for its safety. Mr Watter has no empathy for anyone or any living thing.(attached is a letter from his maternal grandmother to us dated 20th March 2000, which was written a couple of days before Cassie & Michaels’ Wedding) It is self- explanatory and sadly, his behavior has worsened.

Recently a dragon-fly flew in through the window of Bronte and Isabella’s home. Mr Watter caught it and put it in a class jar, screwed on the lid and then made the girls watch its demise over the next few days and then said, ‘This is what happens to naughty girls!’

Attached, also, is a USB stick with evidence for your information.

Mr Watter has treated all Court Rulings in relation to us with contempt. Mr Watter has held these children in a hostage situation for over two years now, hence our call to the Human Rights Commission to report this and the children’s Human Rights being violated.

We were not aware that Cassie was not allowed to report anything of a sexual abuse nature to police, as they had threatened to charge her if she ever again made a complaint. (Also attached is a copy from Mrs. Watter’s diary entries on the day she told Michael that she was leaving him and some days after, QUITE FRIGHTENING!!)

The last time we saw the girls was on the afternoon 3rd April 2014, both were underweight, weak and with Isabella being very quiet. (She was normally a very chatty little person) Isabella wanted to go to the toilet. Michael took her to a public toilet where he stood just outside the door and refused to allow her grandmother to assist her. Isabella was in the toilet for a time in excess of 15minutes.

We have delivered our diaries, which contain sexual abuse allegations, by their father which the children have made to or in front of us to Child Safety

Since 4th April 2014, when the twins disappeared Mr Watter and his friends (Mr. & Mrs. Stephen & Sheeree Heilbronn) have been stalking us. These events have been reported to C.P.I.U. who said that they ‘Would speak to Michael.’ C.P.I.U. did not take a written statement from us.

To clear this case up, we are prepared to travel to Brisbane to be investigated by the C.M.C. and take signed statements from us.

Yours sincerely

 Arthur & Heather Doubleday

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

You may also like…

151 total views, no views today

You disgusting paedophile ! #Leak77 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 77

MICHAEL WATTER , you are such a brave little macho man , but ONLY where babies are concerned !

Tough guy with little girls !

Why do you think your children did not like being with you ?

Let us answer answer the questions for you :-

They did not like being raped ?

They did not like your playing with their vaginas whilst on the toilet ?

They did not like you masturbating yourself ?

They did not like playing with your penis as instructed/ordered to by yourself ?

They did not like you tickling their tooshkas ?

They did not like you rubbing their tooshkas hard with your penis ?

They did not like your friends sexually abusing them ?

They did not like you hurting them ?

They did not like your hurting their mother ?

They did not like your teaching them crude language ?

They did not like you shouting at them ?

They did not like your making them cry ?

They did not like the way you referred to your wife , their mother ?

They did not like you continually hanging up the phone when they were talking to their mother or grandparents ?

They did not like you continually lying to them ?They did not like you playing explicit sexual songs to them ?

They did not like you refusing permission for them to visit their grandparents ?

You did not let them read texts or letters from their mother ?

You threw the letters from the mother in the rubbish bin ?

You are a disgusting , perverted , putrid , bullying , COWARD of a man, with NO saving graces , except , perhaps for the fact that one day you will be dead !

For the future safety of your children  , we would hope this happens sooner than later !

If you do not answer for your sins in this lifetime , and we pray you do , you will most certainly answer for them in the next !

You are a filthy , lying pig , MICHAEL WATTER !

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL DAMAGE & PHYSICAL HARM

 

Nigh on every time that Michael picked up the girls for access visits they would become very quiet and subdued often cry to the point of hysteria and keep stating that they didn’t want to go with him.

4th Nov.         Isabella left a message on our phone. She was sobbing but pleaded with Poppy to come and get her and bring her home to our place so she wouldn’t have to go with her father.

24th Nov.     Bronte told us that Daddy had said that they would be spending more time with him and she didn’t want to. Later both girls are crying and not wanting to go to school as they think that Daddy might pick them up from there after school like he did yesterday.

25th   Nov.      After an access visit, Isabella says, ‘While daddy was getting our lunch he said that husbands can do everything that wives can do but I don’t have a wife, I have a ‘beach’ (bitch).’

28th Nov.     Girls arrive back from access visit screaming. Michael had told them to scream to make out that they didn’t want to return to their Mum.

5th Dec.          Isabella quite sick with very red rash and high temperature. Daddy had given her milk & butter to which she is allergic.

7th Dec.          Both girls not wanting to go for access visit. Isabella states, ‘Daddy is silly because he gives me things to eat that make me sick like he did last time and I had such a sore tummy all night.’ That night Isabella all rashy & hot again.

9th Dec.          Michael awarded full custody of the girls.

11 Dec.          To Willows Markets. Isabella not wanting to return with her father then into Cotters markets where Isabella said that Daddy is still tickling their tooshkas

15th Dec.       Bronte says, ‘Mummy, daddy says that you have been really nasty to him and tried to get him into serious trouble.’

16th Dec.       Isabella, per phone, ‘Why won’t you let us sleep over? Daddy said that you don’t want us to.’ & ‘Daddy only plays with our tooshkas sometimes now, so it is okay!’ Bronte states that Daddy only shouts ‘medium time’

18th Dec.       Cotters Markets morn. Said ‘Hello’ to Michael. He didn’t respond but later said that he was taking girls home for a rest as Isabella sick. 5.30pm. Bronte phoned and wanted her Mum to speak with Isabella as she was really crying. After talking for some minutes as Isabella still crying it was explained that the girls had been out all day with no rest and Michael shouting at them. 7.15pm Bronte phoned and asked her Mum to find a new home as Daddy said that Nana & Poppies’ place was too noisy. Bronte said quickly, I have to go and phone went dead.

20th Dec         Girls arrive for access visit and we are off to a party and Isabella has no undies on. Michael arrives back some 20mins later with undies. We are all at Inclusion Works Office and Michael brings in pants hands them over without speaking to girls or anyone. Later! He late for pick-up and Cassie and I put girls in car and buckle them up. Once again never spoke to girls to even say ‘Hello’.

22 Dec.          On an access visit, Bronte swearing and using crude language which she didn’t do just 2 weeks prior.

24th Dec         Isabella phoned on her dad’s phone as he wouldn’t let her use hers and very sad again. Cassie able to calm and settle her.

25th Dec.       Christmas Day and Isabella phoned on Michael’s phone to say that again Daddy would not allow her to use hers but that Bronte was crying & wouldn’t stop as Daddy was yelling at her. Cassie calmed her. Around to our place and Bronte still very red eyed. Opened Christmas presents, Michael didn’t participate in the excitement but played on his phone. Told us that he had to stop the girls using their phones as it had cost him $80.00 in two days. He didn’t pay anything for phones as Cassie or Auntie Cherie did.

27th Dec          Juan to supervise but only did for 10mins then spent rest of time watching cricket and news on TV.

2nd Jan 2012.            Isabella said that Daddy said that Poppy was scary.

4th Jan.           Girls’ birthday and not able to reach them on their phones. Party at which 22 children plus parents attend and prepared by Cassie & Aunty Cherie. Michael did not participate or try to interact with any of the girls’ friends or parents. As leaving, stated, ‘Trying to buy the girls love with I-Pods!’ No thanks for giving the girls a great time.

10th Jan.        Isabella crying in the bathroom and when I went in she said that Daddy had told them that they could have a sleep-over and now he says we can’t.

15th Jan          After movies and girls clinging to Mum for ages and didn’t want to go back to father, he put them in the car and then Cassie quietly said, ‘Michael the girls aren’t happy. We need to talk about it.’ He instantly became angry and shouted at Cassie, ‘You need to sort yourself out!’ Cassie replied, ‘What do you mean?’ and then he shouted back, ‘You know what I mean!’ He jumped into the car, slammed the door and started to back out, nearly hitting a car coming into the parking area. Obvious that he is not intending to try to give the girls any happiness.

18th Jan          Bronte states, Daddy doesn’t like your family, Mummy so we should either.’ Later, the girls play their recorders to explicit sexual song which Michael is playing on his phone.

23rd Jan.        First day of school. Cassie asked Michael if he would take Bronte’s drink bottle and lunch out of her bag to be taken into the classroom while she did Isabella’s. He immediately became white with anger, snatching the bag, which dislodged the drink bottle which then fell to the ground below the verandah.

24th Jan.        Isabella says, in front of Michael, ‘Mummy, I only want to spend one night with Daddy and one thousand nights with you.’ Then Bronte says, ‘I want to spend one-hundred-thousand nights with you and none with Daddy. Daddy is just so nasty.’   Michael stomped off. At home, later. Isabella jumps up onto the lounge in view of Arth, Michael & me. She did not have any undies on and her vaginal area was so red and raw looking to the point of bleeding. Arth immediately suggested to Michael that he and Cassie take Isabella to the doctor but he refused saying that she didn’t need to. I went down the hallway just as Bronte was coming out of her bedroom. I commented to her about Isabella’s sore tooshka and she said, ‘That’s what happens when Daddy rubs us too hard with his penis!’ Short time later as the girls were stalling, as usual to not go off with their father, they were checking on the kittens when Cassie said that they would soon have to be given away. Isabella immediately started to cry and said, ‘Don’t give the kittens away. Then they will not have a Mummy, like us.’ Cassie received a text that evening to warn her that Michael’s ‘people’ would be watching her very closely, tomorrow.

5th Feb.          Arth & I visited girls at 20 Oldenberg Place Kelso. Asked how they were going at school and they wouldn’t answer. We went around to try and get Michael to agree for some access for us as grandparents but he wouldn’t discuss it but sent an e-mail a couple of weeks later refusing us permission to see the girls so they have been cut off from all family and friends.

From 9th Dec 2011 to 24th Jan 2012, Michael appointed himself as supervisor and during that time the girls came over to our place nearly every Tues & Thurs afternoon and again on Sunday mornings for a family bar-b-cue breakfast. In all that time very rarely did Michael ever engage with the girls and they certainly did not go near him and when Michael would stand up and go near the divider bench of the kitchen, as a sign that it was time to go, the girls would find all sorts of activities to do to delay their departure. Cassie, at first, would tell the girls that they needed to get ready to go but she ended up not saying anything to them as she felt that Michael could have just said something like, ‘Righto! girls, pack up as we need to get going.’ but he never ever did. If they delayed too much he would stand by the car, looking furious, but still never speak. There were never any words of encouragement or assurance from him to the girls.

30th. March 2012.            Court approved supervised access for Cassie & girls begin again today. Cassie has moved.

1st April.         Girls came over for a visit. So glad to see Poppy & I but a little reserved with everybody else except Clarissa who played with the girls and they all had a happy time together but were very reluctant to leave. They have lost weight as their little arms are just so thin.

8th April.        Girls over again today and wanted to stay here and didn’t want to go back to Dad as they said that the always so mean and nasty and always making them cry.

15th April       Isabella sick so moved from Rossiter Park to home ( with Michael’s approval) Again they didn’t want to leave and return to their father.

29th April       Have had Arth in & out of hospital for a couple of weeks and girls visited him there but today they are here at home and yet again found all sorts of thing to do to delay their departure and it ended up being a rush to get them back in time for the change-over.

Arth has been in hospital again and had to have a pacemaker inserted then had a few adverse reactions to same but seem ok now.

13th May       Mothers Day and had bought some gifts for the girls to wrap for their Mum. They were thrilled & so happy wrapping the gifts, signing the card and then giving the presents to their Mum.

3rd June.        Over to Cassie to have the delayed ‘Biggest Morning Tea’ with the girls. Was supposed to be last week-end and when I asked Bronte what had happened she just said, ‘Daddy wouldn’t let us come’.

7th. June.       Up at school and when time to leave, saying ‘goodbye’ to girls when Isabella states, ‘Tomorrow is Mummy Day, the next day is Mummy day and the next day is Mummy day. The good days are only Mummy days.’ I gave both girls big hugs and kisses but left with a very heavy heart.

8th June.         Visit girls at Cassie and they are sad because they will not be seeing Mum tomorrow at Relationships Australia as Michael has cancelled the Saturday access visit. One of the ‘Good Days’ taken from them.

14th June       Arth, Cassie & I at school as Cass & I helping in class. Girls arrive and Michael never spoke to anyone of the parents going into or coming out of the classroom and never said ‘goodbye’ to the girls. Cass had to leave and when Isabella discovered that she would not be back that day she started to cry.

19th June.      Sent the girls a text on their new phone. They had reported that the others had gone missing some weeks prior. They said that they had heard it come in but dad had not allowed them to look at it.

22nd June       Over to visit girls at Cassie’s with friends Christine & Wattie who know the girls and have always been ‘great mates’. The girls very distant with us all. Won’t let us hug them or even touch them in any way.

24th June       Girls not allowed access today.

19th July         Arth back in Hosp. Fluid around the heart.

22nd July        Girls visit Arth in Hosp. Very quiet and subdued and certainly not the little chatterboxes who lived with us last year. Very reluctant to give hugs whereas they were always cuddling up to us.

7th Aug.          Cassie & girls over for a visit and when told time to go, Bronte started to cry and didn’t want to put her shoes & socks on in preparation. 8 months after Michael given full custody and they still do not want to return to him. Poor Bronte looked just so deflated and defeated.

21st Aug.        Visit girls at Cassie’s and they wouldn’t give either Arth or I a hug and were very quiet with Bronte crying. Finally were given a reluctant hug as we were leaving but it just seems that they are scared to talk to anyone.

23 Aug – 1st Sept.    Have been over to visit the girls at Cassie’s a couple of times but they are scared to come near us and so keep their distance and won’t talk.

12th Sept.      Over at Cassie’s again and watching the girls play the organ (Cassie out in kitchen). Isabella looks up and sees me there and gets this look of sheer fright on her face. She sidled up the side of the bed, climbed over it and ran out to her Mum. What or who has made her so scared of her Nana?

In all the time that we have had the girls with us and since Michael has had them in his full care, I have never, ever heard them say anything nice about him. They only refer to him as angry, boring, naughty, not safe, silly, mean or nasty. There have just never been any positive comments with regard to their father but have heard them so often telling their Mum how much they love her and want to be with her.

 

PUBLICLY RE INVESTIGATE THIS CASE !!

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

226 total views, no views today

Queensland Police Commissioner , Ian Stewart , get off your pedestal !! #Leak75 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 75

We have a BIG problem with Queensland Police Commissioner Ian Stewart !
The attached news report is an indication of the type of person who has been elected into office and this is only a part of the problem !
This so called “ leader  “ is a law unto himself and is NOT doing his job !
A man in his position who has the attitude of “ it is my way or the highway  “ is someone totally lacking in leadership qualities !
We also call into question his professionalism ( or should we say – lack thereof ) and call on him to step down off his pedestal , admit to the fact that he is exhibiting qualities that do not match those expected of a policeman in his position .
How can someone who professes to be a professional policeman MAKE A JUDGEMENT on a case where he admits to :-
NOT having viewed tapes of a police interview between one of his officers , child safety and the mother ?
NOT viewed the interview between the children and the the police ,child safety ?
REFUSES to accept the analysis by a qualified individual of the interview , said interview not having been watched by himself ?
NOT having read any of the supervisor’s reports of abuse by the father ?
NOT having viewed ANY of the other police and child safety interviews of the girls ?
What an abject display of ignorance by this so called leader Ian Stewart !
The fact that a child , YES A CHILD , Ian Stewart , has a sexually transmitted infection and a bleeding anus is of NO concern to you , says it all doesn’t it ?
We invite the Queensland Police Commissioner to view the evidence we have referred to !
He is welcome to use this platform to respond to our comments as we stand to be corrected on villifying this man !
We also know he will not do so as he thinks he is beyond reproach !
You are a disgrace to your uniform , the public whom you serve and those who serve under you !
We also have a problem with Minister for Child Safety Hon Shannon Fentiman MP and Michael Hogan the Director General of  Communities ( including Child Safety ) who promise to do something and then do nothing to fulfil their promises . Indicative of all that is wrong with the child protection system !
You are both a disgrace !
And now we wait to see what Malcolm Turnbull , Bill Shorten and  AnnastaciaPalaszczuk  do to make amends and look into this matter ?
A PUBLIC RE INVESTIGATION is what is needed Mr Prime Minister !
A Townsville Community Cabinet Meeting was held on 29/03/2015 .
Re Bronte and Isabella Watter
In attendance ,
Yvette DÁth MP
Jo-Anne Miller MP
Shannon Fentiman MP
Queensland Police Commissioner Ian Stewart
Director General of Communities ( including child safety ) , Michael Hogan
Regional Director of Child Safety Nicola Jeffers
North Queensland Regional Director for Communities
Main concern for the meeting – is that the Watter twins , if found , will be returned to their father MICHAEL WATTER’S care without any new and thorough investigation being carried out , taking into account and recognising the inadequacy of the previous investigations .
Major concerns
1. Inadequacy of investigations to date by Police and Child Safety
2. Failure of the Independent Lawyer for the children ( Joanne Meade , employed by Legal Aid in Townsville ) to place a prime focus on the needs and interests of the children ,
3, Biased , negative mindset of all the government employees – Police , Child Safety , Independent Lawyer for the children , against the mother and ALL witnesses to disclosures made by the girls .
4. Failure of the government employees to consider that they may have been charmed ( groomed/conned ) by the father . This is a serious omission , given that “grooming “is well-documented in research on child sexual abuse .
Elaboration of these concerns
Inadequacy of investigations by Police and Child Safety
1. Failure to consider all the evidence re Child Sexual Abuse ( CSA ) and , in particular
    a. Reports submitted by contact supervisors
    b. Statements submitted by all other people who heard the girls make disclosures
    c. A notification that one of the girls had reportedly been diagnosed with an STI and a torn anus
2. Disbelief accorded to disclosures made by the two 5 year old girls in interviews with Police and Child Safety . This was particularly marked after
    a. Isabella retracted her disclosures after 3 nights in a foster home , saying “it was a dream “. This is consistent with research on young children’s pattern of reporting disclosures but the government professionals appear to not have this knowledge and appear to have been predisposed to accept the retraction at face value , possibly on account of the bias they held in favour of the father .
    b.Isabella tells the police interviewer that mummy told her to tell the police about what Daddy does to her and her sister . This was misinterpreted by the police as mummy having coached Isabella in what to say whereas , from the contact supervisor’s reports , it is clear that mummy simply encouraged the girls to tell other people what they had told her .There is NO evidence of coaching in the contact supervisor’s reports , it is clear that mummy simply encouraged the girls to tell other people what they had told her . There is NO evidence of coaching in the in the contact supervisor’s reports and , indeed , the complex detail in the disclosures made to the police by the girls could not possibly have been coached at all – let alone by a mother whose total contact with the girls was supervised .
3. Failure of the Child Safety staff present in the interviews with police to act on the balance of probabilities that the children had experienced harm and were at risk of future harm if left in the care of their father . The Child Safety staff appeared to have deferred to the Police who need to assemble evidence beyond all reasonable doubt in order to lay criminal charges . In this way the civil principle of the best interests of the child was subordinated to the interests of police re criminal charges . This indicates failure on the part of Child Safety staff to
    a. Believe what young children say about abuse , against all advice of child sexual abuse literature .
    b. Prioritise concern for the protection of young children , especially in a “ Family Court case “ . In such cases research research has demonstrated how professionals continue to give precedence to a ‘scepticism paradigm ‘rather than to child protection .
    c. Consider the possibility that they , the professionals , may be being groomed by a perpetrator of child abuse – grooming by perpetrators is well documented in research on child sexual abuse .
    d. Value the efforts of a protective mother , rather than misinterpreting her behaviour and deeming it to have caused “emotional abuse “ to the children without double checking their assumptions against the contact supervisors’ reports .This is a key failure in the investigations by police and child safety and contrary to all recommendations emanating from CSA research .
4. Restricting the mother
    a. From making any further reports of possible abuse ,asserting that : they would not be investigated ; charges would be laid against her , and they , the professionals , would recommend to the Family Court that she lose all contact with the girls .
    b. From reading a child protection book with the girls , despite the girls enjoying both the verse and the little black cat . Astonishingly , using this book was perceived by police as tantamount to ‘coaching ‘even though it’s use is recommended by police and Child Safety .
    c. From looking at the girls genitalia , even when , on supervised contact visits , they complained about being sore in that region of their anatomy . If she did she faced arrest .
Failure of the Independent Lawyer for the children ( Joanne Meade , employed by Legal Aid in Townsville ) to place a prime focus on the needs and interests of the children .
1. Failure to forward all supervisor’s reports which contained disclosures of CSA to the Police and Child Safety .
2. Failure to submit all the supervisor’s reports to the Family Court .
3. Attempted—at the father’s request – to influence a psychiatrist to revise his assessment of the mother’s mental health .
Biased , negative mindset of all the government employees, Police , Child Safety , Independent Lawyer for the children – against the mother and all witnesses to disclosures made by the girls .
1. Statements by the police and child safety staff that the mother is mentally ill have been made with no evidential foundation and contrary to the assessments made by 2 psychiatrists and 4 psychologists .
2. Claims by the police and child safety staff that the mother has fabricated allegations of child sexual abuse , seemingly based on a glib assumption that “ this happens in Family Court Cases  “ . Such scepticism on the part of professionals is based on the now discredited theory of parental alienation . This out dated knowledge base is a serious concern since it can lead to failure to protect children from harm .
3. Claims by the Police , Child Safety staff , and the independent lawyer for the children , to take seriously the statements of all persons ( contact supervisors and others ) who heard the girls make disclosures of CSA , despite the complete lack of evidence in the contact supervisor’s reports that this happened .
4. Failure by the police , child Safety , and the independent lawyer for the children , to take seriously the statements of all persons ( contact supervisors and others ) who heard the girls make disclosures , on the grounds that the girls had been coached by their mother . This is despite the complete lack of evidence of ‘behaviour that is of a sustained and repetitive nature during contact with the girls ‘ as claimed in a notification to Child Safety dated 17/07/12 . How this could have been substantiated by child safety without considering the contact supervisors’ reports and interviewing the supervisors is simply incredible .
Failure of the government employees to consider that they may have been charmed ( groomed/conned ) by the father. This is a serious omission on their part , given that ‘grooming ‘is well documented in research on child sexual abuse .
1. The bias of police , child safety staff , and the independent lawyer for children in favour of the father and against the mother ( and against all witnesses to the girls disclosures ) has been palpable throughout this case and , once entrenched , has not been exposed to critically reflective scrutiny . Or , if it has , there has been a built-in inclination to not revise their professional judgements and admit to having been wrong .
2. In this regard there appears to be an implicit assumption that while the girls and their mother are missing this critical scrutiny is not necessary and that , when they are found , it will continue to be not necessary as the mother will be incarcerated and the girls will be returned to their father’s care .
Conclusions and Recommendation
This latter outcome – return of the girls to their father’s care – is our greatest concern . It is our belief that if this happens the girls would be at risk of serious harm in their father’s care and the authorities would be guilty of failing to act to protect young children from harm .
In our view , it is essential that if , or when , the children are located that they be placed in the care of loving family members , or close family friends , rather than strangers such as foster carers !
Due to the fact that the paternal grandmother , Mrs Patricia Watter , lives with a serious mental illness and also suffers with many physical health issues . In our view it would be in the best interests of the children to be placed with the maternal grandparents , Heather and Arthur Doubleday . Heather and Arthur are Blue card holders and they still have the children’s bedroom as it was when they lived at their home in 2011 , with some of their animals also there for for them to play with . It would be very familiar to them and would afford a sense of security .
RESPONSE FROM THE MEETING
From : Arthur Doubleday
To: Freda Briggs
Cc: Recipient 1 , Recipient 2 , Recipient 3 , Recipient 4 , Recipient 5 .
Dear Freda ,
on the afternoon of Sunday 29th March 2015 , we organised a deputation to meet with some ministers in the new Queensland Labor Government :-
Attorney General etc. Hon Yvette DÁth MP
Minister for Police etc. Hon Jo-Anne Miller MP
Minister for Communities etc. Hon Shannon Fentiman MP
We were allotted a time slot of 2.45 pm with the Hon Jo-Anne Miller MP the Minister for Police etc.only .
Our deputation included Heather and I , Emeritus Professor Rosamund Thorpe , specializing in Social Work and Community Welfare , with over 45 years experience , Ms Virginia Hall , Adjunct Senior Lecturer Community Welfare , Mrs Rae Greaves , Dip. Community Welfare , worker for many years at Sera Womens Shelter and volunteer at Domestic Violence Service Centre Townsville and Mrs Rhonda Lane . The last three ladies were registered supervisors of Cassie while with her daughters Isabella and Bronte Watter . These supervisors were approved by the family court , Independent children’s lawyer , Ms Joanne Meade and Mr Michael Watter . These supervisors and ourselves had been told by Bronte and Isabella , allegations of sexual , physical and psychological abuse perpetrated against them by their father , Mr Michael Watter .
The Minister for Police was assisted by the Queensland Police Commissioner , Ian Stewart and another high ranking police officer whose name escapes us .
From the outset , the Commissioner ‘took the floor ‘ , was not interested in any evidence we presented , as he stated it was only ‘hearsay ‘or anything we had to say . He kept repeating that we should let Mrs. Watter , Cassie , know that she should be brave enough to come forward and state her case and allow the children to be further interrogated , as it was the only way that the case could be solved . He also stated that the police had been away from their father too long .
The Commissioner admitted that he had not viewed the the tapes of the Police interview between Det Sgt David Miles , Constable Michelle Faint , Child Safety and the children . He also admitted that he had not viewed that interview of Cassie with David Miles and Child Safety and refused to accept the analysis of that interview by Dr Pamela Schultz , that he had not read any of the supervisors reports of abuse by the father against the girls or viewed any of the other police interviews of the girls with Police and Child Safety .
The Commissioner continued to ‘ shut us down ‘every time we attempted to speak , repeating his line that nothing could be done until Cassie returned with the children . He inferred often that we knew where she was and would be able to contact her , even saying that her brothers and sister would surely be in contact with her on social media .
The Hon Jo-Anne Miller MP sat throughout all of the dialogue , saying very little and often with her mouth agape as she appeared quite horrified . She did say, on at least three occasions , that we should be speaking with the Minister for Child Safety .
Bear in mind that if Cassie and the girls were ‘brave enough ‘to come forward and be interviewed by Police and Child Safety to only be told , yet again , by Det Snr Sgy David Miles that she was a liar and he did not believe her or the children , she is not likely to come forward .
A short meeting was arranged with the Minister for Child Safety Hon Shannon Fentiman MP and even though though we had to sit and wait for sometime , we feel that it was worth the wait . This delegation included , Michael Hogan , Director General of Communities ( including child safety ) , the new North Queensland Regional Director for Communities , Sandra ( ? ) and the Regional Director of Child Safety Nicola Jeffers . We had been informed that the Review being conducted by Child Safety for some 10 months had been finalised but Mr Hogan informed that the Review , our statements , interview tapes , and all other relevant material .This was encouraging . He informed Heather and I that he would be arranging for us to be interviewd , in the near future and that we should present all evidence
I let the ‘dust ‘settle before writing this as we were all breathless by the ignorance shown to us by the Commissioner .
We will keep you up to date .
Yours sincerely
Heather and Arthur Doubleday

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

133 total views, no views today

#FreeMissingTwins #PressStatement11

We have in our possession a letter from Michael Watter’s grandmother where the good lady ends off her correspondence by saying :-
 “When this should be a “Happy Occasion “  for us it is not , the worst mother in the world deserves deserves better than what Michael has shown to his Mother .
Michael’s grandmother was referring to Cassie and Michael’s wedding in her letter !
Other extracts as follows :-
She loved him so much .
She gave him all .
He never “ wanted “ .
When Patricia was fighting for her life in the P.A. after the shocking car accident , she called for Michael as soon as she could speak . I never thought that Michael would treat his mother like this .
I am truly disgusted with Michael .
I hope when he takes his “vows “before God He has time to remember those that were there – When the numbers were “down “ being the Douglas Family .
I seen Patricia sit and cry for so long and so often , just to have Michael call to see her !
When he lived at Alderley – no He never came – being 12 months .
The old saying goes – It’s a long road without a turn – see how he goes then ! when his turn comes .
Michael told Trish to get a job – He is lucky she kept him at school and put him where he is today .
Just another indication of how selfish this self centred little man is – just saying !
Has the penny dropped yet ? No ? — well stick around blind people !
WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

143 total views, no views today

Now WHY would a child safety officer refuse to disclose her name ? #Leak66 #WikiDetectives

 

LEAK 66

READ this LEAK in conjunction with LEAK 65

No wonder the mother went into hiding with her children ! Any protective mother would have done the same .

No action by Queensland Police , no action by Child Protection Investigation Unit , no investigation by Children’s Services and no action by Queensland Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee — the system has let these children down and no one is being held accountable yet an arrest warrant has been issued for the mother to cover up their lack of professionalism , ineptitude and paedophile enabling !

Read this letter ( those of you that are not blind ) and decide for yourself if what we are saying is correct !

 

RE INVESTIGATE , RE INVESTIGATE , RE INVESTIGATE .

 

LEAK 66

Queensland Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee

Parliament House

George Street Brisbane

Qld   4000.

 

26th November 2014

 

Dear Committee Members,

 

We are the grandparents of Isabella & Bronte Watter who, with our daughter Ms Catherine (Cassie) Watter, went into hiding on 4th April 2014 and are still missing.

 

We believe that, due to evidence which has emerged since 1st April 2014 and the failure of the Queensland Police notably the Child Protection Investigation Unit and Childrens Services in Townsville to adequately protect these children, prompted Ms Watter to break the law (which we do not condone) in taking her children into hiding.

 

We contacted the C.M.C. (now C.C.C.) on 24th April 2014 and the forwarding letter with their reply, are attached.

 

Although we, as grandparents, have attempted to report abuse of our grandchildren to C.P.I.U. and Child Safety, on many occasions, they refused to speak with us or take statements from us.  Attached is a list of dates of our attempts to report abuse.

 

We finally met with Child Safety on 17th January 2013 and spoke with and Intake Officer who introduced herself as Ms Gaynor. This Officer was asked on three occasions for her full name and each time she said that it was Ms Gaynor. We discovered, weeks later, that her correct name was actually Ms Gaynor Williams.

 

Ms Williams refused to accept the sexual abuse allegations which both of the children had reported to us. She instructed us to contact Police as Child Safety does not handle sexual abuse to children. Attached is a transcript of that interview with Ms Williams.

 

In desperation, we phoned Snr Sgt David Miles on 20th January 2013. A transcript of this conversation is attached and self-explanatory.

 

As of today’s date, no Police Officer has ever taken official statements from us or any of the many other witnesses to whom the children have disclosed abuse, by their father, to them. We consider this to be inacceptable and an injustice to the children as they are instructed in schools, all over Australia, to tell and keep telling if and when they are being abused.

 

It has now been revealed that the Police and Child Safety interview of Ms Watter was outrageous as they refused to take statements of abuse to the children from her but abused their authority by telling her that no abuse to her children had occurred and never would.  Attached is analysis of the interview by Dr Pamela  D Schulz, critical analysis of the discourse of disbelief in the child sexual abuse. A disturbing report.

 

On Saturday 1st September 2012, Ms Watter with a Court approved supervisor, took the children to Magnetic Island for the day, during which time, the children made several allegations of abuse by the father. On return from the Island, the supervisor insisted that Ms Watter take the children to the Police as she was of the opinion that the children should not go back to the father because of his abuse to them. They arrived at C.P.I.U. headquarters latish afternoon. We were parked outside the Station and at approximately 8.00pm we requested that we be allowed to see our granddaughters. The Officer on duty phoned the C.P.I.U, upstairs and they refused us permission to see the children or take them any food or drinks. It has now been revealed that the C.P.I.U. left the children in an interview room alone for just on an hour with the cameras on and despite the children’s repeated requests for books to read, to go to the toilet and wanting to know where anyone was, the requests were ignored. This action by C.P.I.U. Officers is child abuse in itself.

 

The failures in this case are so immense that Queenslander of the Year, Ms Hetty Johnston of ‘Bravehearts  and Emeritus Professor Freda Briggs AO, have approached the Queensland Premier, the Attorney General and the Minister for Childrens Services, Ms Tracey Davis, seeking an Independent Enquiry into the failure of Queensland Departments to protect these children. The Government, to date, has refused all requests for and Independent Enquiry.

 

Also attached is correspondence to our local MP for Thuringowa, Hon Sam Cox. Mr Cox has, as yet, not replied.

 

We understood that it was a crime to not report child abuse.

 

No doubt, all the interview discs which were conducted by Child Safety and Police of the children are available to your committee for viewing.

 

Please investigate this matter by examining all the available evidence not the Police and Child Safety reports.

 

The father, Mr Michael Watter, appears to have breached Section 121 of the Federal Family Court Act by revealing on Television, Magazines, Facebook and Newspapers photos and names of ourselves and the children. On the other hand, the mother and ourselves are respecting Section 121 of the Act and can never tell the true story. His Honour Justice Peter Tree of the Federal Family Court, made it very clear to Mr Watter and ourselves that section 121 should not be breached and would be enforced.

 

We trust that this matter will be thoroughly investigated, so that the children’s repeated cries for help will be heard.

 

Yours faithfully

Heather & Arthur Doubleday

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

100 total views, no views today

Outstanding work by Child Safety ! No wonder we have children out there getting raped on a daily basis ! #Leak65 #WikiDetectives

 

 

 

 LEAK 65

Child Safety Interview 13th March 2013

OK Folks please come through.

CS Gaynor:  speaking to Neville Abbey  “My information is that as a support person you are

not to make comment OK?

NEVILLE:          No I understand that

ARTHUR:         Support person basically

CC Gaynor:     As a support person you remember that the information remains confidential.

NEVILLE:          Yes

CS Gaynor:      I am also aware that you have been here before.

ARTHUR:         Once

CS Gaynor:      So its OK if I talk  in front of this gentleman.      ARTHUR:         Of course

CS Gaynor:      You have been here before and you have given us information.  My role is to take current  Information OK?  Because if you have provided us with information before we can’t go over old information so I want new information.

ARTHUR:        That’s the reason why we are here today

CS Gaynor:      Beautiful.  So it’s about your grandchildren?

ARTHUR:         Yes

CPIU Gaynor:  Two little girls?

ARTHUR:         Yes

CS Gaynor:      OK I understand is it Isabella?ARTHUR:         Isabella and Bronte Watter.

CS Gaynor:      Is it double T?

ARTHUR:         Yes double T

CS Gaynor:      Alright, now what is your current information?  So it should be new information

That we haven’t received before.

ARTHUR:         We have never been interviewed before by Child Safety.

CS Gaynor:      I’m not interviewing you, you’re bringing me information.

ARTHUR:         Well we have attempted on many occasions to give you information and we

have been unsuccessful.

CS Gaynor:      OK  You understand that to provide us with information all you need to do is call us on intake line and you can provide us information at any time.

ARTHUR:         Did you see the information I brought in the other day about the way we have

tried to contact you and the CPIU?

CS Gaynor:      Ah! No!  That’s OK.  I haven’t all the information because somebody else would’ve already taken that wouldn’t they?

ARTHUR:         It’s very relevant.

CS Gaynor:      So you’ve already documented what you are saying to me now?

ARTHUR:         They weren’t documented I just gave them the information documents

CS Gaynor:      I can give you a phone number.  Did you get the phone number for our intake

Line?

ARTHUR:         No I didn’t.

CS Gaynor:      I’ll give you that number and give you a card if you want or write 1300706147. Right?

ARTHUR:         OK.

CS Gaynor:      That’s Child Safety intake and if it busy at that particular time it will overflow to

another regional intake, but there will always be an intake.  OK? So it will be an

intake service.

ARTHUR:         No problem.

CS Gaynor:      So what is your current information for intake today?

ARTHUR:         Well it goes back to 8th October 2011.

CS Gaynor:      Have you given that information already?

ARTHUR:         No.

CS Gaynor:      So what did you give them when you came in the other day when you said you

came in?

ARTHUR:         Well I gave them information about nothing relevant to what’s happening here.

The file’s there why don’t you go and grab it.  I asked for a copy actually.

CS Gaynor:      I need to know, we can’t provide any information that we are given OK?  Once

we receive information it’s confidential.

ARTHUR:         Yes.

CS Gaynor:      It’s under government procedure and legislation its confidential OK?  So we cannot give that information back out to anybody.

ARTHUR:         Not even ourselves?

CS Gaynor:      Not even yourself.  If you ring up again and say I just rang up the other day I would not tell you what was said or what you provided us with.  Confidential is adhered to.  You have to go through the right intake again and that’s policy.

I can’t break policy.  So if you have got current information you haven’t pro-

vided us after the intake then we take it now.

ARTHUR:         That’s been our intent to date to talk to Child Safety.

CS Gaynor:      But that’s not current information of what you’ve got.

ARTHUR:         But we are going back to 2009.

CS Gaynor:      No, I am talking about current information that you serve us OK

ARTHUR:         Yes

CS Gaynor:      What information you claim in association with the children you are talking about.

ARTHUR:         OK.

CS Gaynor:      Even though you have come in here and you have given information last week?

ARTHUR:         Nothing about the children.

CS Gaynor:      OK.  That’s what I’m after. I’m after what your concerns are about the children.

ARTHUR:         OK we go back to

CS Gaynor:      Your information about trying to contact us has nothing to do with what’s going on with the children.

ARTHUR:         Alright.

CS Gaynor:      I need to know what the concerns are for the children.

ARTHUR:         OK, it’s back to date is 8th October 2011.

CS Gaynor:      You have not provided that to us?

ARTHUR:         No.  No we’ve provided any information to you whatever simply because we haven’t been able to get in contact with you.  We have attempted on many occasions.  We were at home on that day and people called Sheree and Steven Heilbronn turned up at our home, roughly 3 o’clock in the afternoon.

CS Gaynor:      Mm.

ARTHUR:         And that was after there had been a separation and the mother and children were living at our home.

CS Gaynor:      What mother and children?

ARTHUR:         Bronte and Isabella’s mother.

CS Gaynor:      And she was living at your home?

ARTHUR:         Yes

CS Gaynor:      OK

ARTHUR:         And the father had picked the children up and said that he was taking them to the beach.

CS:                   Have you provided this in any court documents or anything?

ARTHUR:         No.

CS Gaynor:      Why not?

ARTHUR:         Well, we can’t talk to anybody.

CS Gaynor:      But we are not the family law court.

ARTHUR:         No.

CS Gaynor: We’re Child Safety and you can ring us up any time and we are open to any organization in the community to ring us.

ARTHUR:         In my attempts to talk to Child Safety madam and we’ve tried on many occasions.

CS Gaynor:      So you’ve had contact with the Regional Director?

ARTHUR:         Mr. Lupe?

CS Gaynor:      Yes

ARTHUR:         Yes, but couldn’t get an interview.  He just said he would let me know what was happening and we’ve got information that’s very relevant to this case.

CS Gaynor:      We do many walk in interviews like today.  We do interviews.

ARTHUR:         Oh yes.  We had to make an appointment to be here today.

CS Gaynor:      Why did you do that?

ARTHUR:         Because I was told to.

CS Gaynor:      Because you came in last week and you said you would be back again today.

ARTHUR:         No.  I said I need an appointment to talk to someone about the children.  She said OK.

CS Gaynor:      Well that’s fine saying that, but we are available anytime.

ARTHUR:         OK

CS Gaynor:      You use phone calls to the intake service at any time but it’s not up to the original intake that you are here.

ARTHUR:         I’ve got to start at the beginning, because you people have no information about our involvement in this case at all.

CS Gaynor:      Alright.

ARTHUR:         None whatever.CS Gaynor:      So, have you been to the police?

ARTHUR:         Several occasions and they won’t talk to us either.

CS Gaynor:      What do you mean by that?  Did they take your information?

ARTHUR:         We went to (um I’ve got it here somewhere).  No they didn’t take the information.

ARTHUR:         Yes

CS Gaynor:      What did you do when you came in last week?

ARTHUR:         I gave them information in relation to a disclosure by our daughter.  That’s all.  Nothing else.  Nothing else was discussed.  The children weren’t even named.

CS Gaynor:      Good

ARTHUR:         Now we’ve been to the Police on 20th January 2012, 8th March 2012, 15th March 2012, 4th July 2012 and 1st October 2012.  Never been able to, oh no Child Safety, sorry.  Those are the dates we attempted to contact you people.

The police 4th October 2012 CPIU in the city.  Now we gave them some information.  The fellow at the front desk said “You sit down there these people will want to talk to you.

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

ARTHUR:         The fellow came back and said they will be in touch.  They never have.

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

ARTHUR:         They never have. 13th October, no it was 15th October 2012, city CPIU again, same thing, will be in touch.  They didn’t.  19th October 2012 Kirwan Police Station.  We will pass this onto the unit and they will be in touch.  And I appreciate that because I don’t know if there is a unit out at Kirwan and then 7th November 2012 Kirwan Police Station the same thing, never got an interview.  Then January 13th 2013 I rang up Senior Sergeant David Miles who is the Chief of the CPIU and he refused to take the interview.

CS Gaynor:      Does anybody

ARTHUR:         We’ve given them a couple of written statements, that’s all.

CS Gaynor:      Has anybody else in the family provided information?

ARTHUR:         My daughter I would think.

CS Gaynor:      Was it the same information?

ARTHUR:         No.

CS Gaynor:      Why?

ARTHUR:         Well, I don’t know.

CS Gaynor:      What I’m trying to say “Is your information second hand information of first hand information?”

ARTHUR:         It involves us.  It’s first hand information.

CS Gaynor:      You were there?

ARTHUR:         Yes, it was in our home.

CS Gaynor:      OK.  So I’m happy to take what’s first hand information.

ARTHUR:         OK.

CS Gaynor:      I don’t need anything that’s not relevant, only first hand information.

ARTHUR:         I appreciate that.

CS Gaynor:      Because you don’t know if the mother has contacted Child Safety.

ARTHUR:         Many occasions I’d say.  It’s not discussed.

CS Gaynor:      Well then I take your view.  So I’m happy to take it.  So what’s your first view?

ARTHUR:         8th October 2011 Heilbronns’ turned up at our home on Saturday afternoon about 3 o’clock.  Prior to that the father had picked up the children and said that he was taking them to the beach.  When the children came home we were all there and they said that they didn’t go to the beach, they went to the Heilbronns’.  Daddy and Sheree and Mr. Heilbronns were asking questions about where they’re going to live and that worried us and Cassie.  Cassie sent the father and Heilbronn a text “Please don’t involve the children in what’s happening with the breakdown of the marriage.  Mr. & Mrs. Heilbronn turned up at our house as I say.   We invited them inside.  They became very aggressive.  There was a very animated conversation and they made it very clear to us that if we didn’t convince Cassie and the girls to return to the family home with Michael immediately, they’d be in touch with the authorities and have the children taken from the mother.

CS Gaynor:      Let’s talk about the children.

ARTHUR:         No, let’s get the facts.  Would you please write that down?

CS Gaynor:      What my role is and that we are interested in is the risk to the children and harm

to the children.  That’s a conversation you’ve had with another group of people.

But I need to know what the risk is to the children.

ARTHUR:         Well, why don’t you listen to what I’ve got to say?

CS Gaynor:      Now just hold on.

CS Gaynor:      You’re talking about a family law court arrangement OK.

ARTHUR:         We’re talking

CS Gaynor:      We’re talking about a set of people.

HEATHER:       It wasn’t

CS Gaynor:      OK we’re talking about a conversation for family law court.  It was a family…?

ARTHUR:         No

HEATHER:       No.  These people just came into our home and threatened that if our daughter

didn’t go back to her husband with her children they would make sure that she lost the children.

ARTHUR:         They would go to the

HEATHER:       The authorities and make sure she lost the children.

CS Gaynor:      OK.  Did you tell the appropriate authorities this?  Because once again Child

Safety wouldn’t be involved.

ARTHUR:         They were.

CS Gaynor:      Once again there were no children there while it was being discussed with adults

and if you felt threatened you should contact the police.  Did you contact the

Police?

ARTHUR:         We didn’t.

CS Gaynor:      Alright, go on.

ARTHUR:         Now

CS Gaynor:      Don’t, don’t get frustrated.  Bear with me.  I’ve got to perform my role.

ARTHUR:         We’re here.

CS Gaynor:      My role is, you understand?

ARTHUR:         I do.

CS Gaynor:      I can’t do a police role.

ARTHUR:         I don’t want you to.  All we are interested in is these little girls.

CS Gaynor:      I can’t deal with Family Law Court, in that it is completely different to what Child

Safety, so I’ve got to do my job as the Child Safety Officer.

ARTHUR:         OK.  Now these little girls were asleep in the bedroom and the conversation

became very animated and we asked them to go outside, and they refused on

three occasions and the little children woke up screaming.

HEATHER:       The mother tried to pacify the children and asked them to leave and they

wouldn’t.  They just kept yelling.

ARTHUR:         And then they, while they were there they made a statement that Cassie had

been abused by her elder brother on a daily basis for eight years which is about

2, 900 odd times and that if the girls didn’t go back to Cassie, Michael would have them removed from her.

HEATHER:       To Michael

ARTHUR:         To Michael, they would and they also mentioned about the family violence in the

home against the mother and the children and they said “That’s normal in all

family homes and

HEATHER:       And not to take any notice of it.

ARTHUR:         When I asked about the support for the children from the father they said “They

should never have left home even though they were being abused.  They were

petrified.  So then we went to, that was on the Saturday afternoon.  We went to

The Family Violence Centre on Monday morning.  I took our daughter out and we

took a DVO to cover against the father.

CS Gaynor:      Yep

ARTHUR:         To cover ourselves and the girls against the Heilbronns’ and Michael, Michael

Watter the father.

CS Gaynor:      Um so this is to you the father

ARTHUR:         Yes my wife

CS Gaynor:      The children?

ARTHUR:         Yes, because they were living at our place

CS Gaynor:      Yep

ARTHUR:         When it got to court, the Heilbronns’ disputed and got their name taken off it and

the DVO was on Michael and it involved Isabella, the mother and ourselves.

CS Gaynor:      I’m confused.

ARTHUR:         Well the DVO when it went to court

CS Gaynor:      The actual DVO, so the court’s changed it.

ARTHUR:         The application

CS Gaynor:      Who approved the application?

ARTHUR:         They changed it and took the Heilbronns’ off it.  Left Michael on it, ourselves and

Isabella because she’d been hurt by her father squeezing her.

CS Gaynor:      So who was left on it?  Isabella?

ARTHUR:         Isabella, ourselves

CS Gaynor:      Daughter Cassie?

ARTHUR:         Yep.  Now the next one.  This is the next day, that was on the 8th October 2011.

HEATHER:       14/10/2011 was the day I remember like it was

CS Gaynor:      My job to be child protection, to work on the situation with somebody else needs to be relevant

CS Gaynor:      OK MY information needs to be about the children.

ARTHUR:         Yes, sure. Sure. Then on that afternoon they accused of us setting Michael up.

Have you got it the details?

HEATHER:       That was 30th September 2011

ARTHUR:         30TH September 2011.

CS Gaynor:      Can we go backwards?

ARTHUR:         Yes

HEATHER:       The girls had been saying that things about their father sexually abusing them.

ARTHUR:         So we decided what we best to ask him before, you know.  Let the girls confront

him.  Go on Heather.

HEATHER:       He arrived and my daughter just said “The girls have been saying things and we

want to know, if it’s true with that Bronte and Isabella took themselves outside

and Bronte called out “Now don’t you start getting angry Daddy.”

ARTHUR:         And they did confirm that he had been interfering with them both by the way.

CS Gaynor:      They said that

ARTHUR:         Yes.

CS Gaynor:      What did they say?

ARTHUR:         They said yes in front of their mother, in front of their father and ourselves.

CS Gaynor:      So you still didn’t make a statement did you?

ARTHUR:         They had been asked plenty of times

CS Gaynor:      Did you take this information to the police

ARTHUR:         No.

CS Gaynor:      Why Not?

ARTHUR:         That’s quite obvious.  Well

CS Gaynor:      I can’t override police, that’s a criminal action.

HEATHER:       What part can you be involved in no matter what you are supposed to do is hard.  Yes, that was stupid.  Looking behind we should’ve done this we should’ve done that, we should’ve done something else.  We just don’t know.

CS Gaynor:      Yes Absolutely, Absolutely.  Now have you been involved in any court decisions?

ARTHUR:         Never.

CS Gaynor:      So the children made a statement and mind you the children didn’t make this

statement.  All they said was “yes”.  It was the parent that made the statement.

ARTHUR:         No.  They were asked the question?  “Has Daddy been doing naughty things to you?”

CS Gaynor:      But they didn’t make the statement.

ARTHUR:         No

CS Gaynor:      Because you have already told us, so once again it is a criminal action.  Police need to be involved at the time of that.  Any time that somebody has been sexually harmed or sexual predicated on, it is a criminal offence, if it has been identified by police as criminal offence.  Alright go on.  I just got to make you understand. I’ve got to because I can’t do the criminal actions as well.

ARTHUR:         That’s right.  I don’t expect you to Maam.

CS Gaynor:      Alright?

ARTHUR:         That’s for sure.

CS Gaynor:      I can’t take over the role of police

ARTHUR:         Any how the fact of the matter is that they were asked if Daddy was doing it  and they said “yes” and they ran out to play and as they were leaving Bronte said “Daddy don’t get angry again.

HEATHER:       He is always angry.  That’s all they would call him.  They would call him angry, mean, nasty

ARTHUR:         So then Michael.  I said to Michael “This is pretty serious.”  Michael said “Oh I will ring the police.”  Good.  So he got out his mobile phone he pressed the button and he went straight to some police, he never went through a switchboard.

CS: Gaynor      Yep.

ARTHUR:         And um I don’t know what was said on the phone, of course.  And then we took the girls down the back down the back paddock under the mango trees, we have five acres out there.  We didn’t want them involved in this.

CS Gaynor:      What ward do you live.

ARTHUR:         Rasmussen, 1155 Riverway Drive, two doors up from the Community Centre.

CS: Gaynor:     Yes      Yes      Yes

ARTHUR:         And um, then Michael came down and got them.  He didn’t take them did he?

He didn’t take them with him he decided to leave them there.  I said to Michael.

You know, he has always been made welcome to our place; we have never had a dispute with him.

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

ARTHUR:         I said to him “These are serious allegations Michael, it might be better if you leave the kids until you sort this out.” He said “yes OK” and he did, so they stayed there on that occasion and then

HEATHER:       Every time he comes to the place for an access visit Bronte used to, when she knew that Daddy was coming that afternoon, just sit and stare and you couldn’t sort of have contact with her.

CS Gaynor:      How long have the children been living with you?

ARTHUR:         They are happy with us now.  The court gave the children to the father.  The father accused the mother of coaching and also issued a statement saying that the mother had sent the father a text on the Saturday afternoon we are talking about, “Come on over honey, the girls can’t wait to see you.”  Now, that never happened.  We’ve got a transcript from Telstra of all the texts sent from our daughter’s phone on that day and that was not in it, so it didn’t happen but he got custody on part of that.

HEATHER:       So these girls are living with the father that has been abusing them.

CS Gaynor:      How long have the girls been living with the father?

HEATHER:       9th December 2011.  From that moment on they have just seen their mother under supervision and they have just told every supervisor who has been with them telling them Daddy is still doing things to them.

CS Gaynor:      And that information is directly reported when they make those comments.

ARTHUR:         No we haven’t been putting it in because nobody will talk to us.

CS Gaynor:      No, I’m talking about the mother because obviously that is first hand information at time of contact and things like that.

ARTHUR:         The day after.  You’d better get your diary out that day at the markets.  These are pretty relevant.  Comments these little kids have made.

HEATHER:       2 days after the court gave the girls to Michael.

ARTHUR:         Have you got the right date?

HEATHER:       Two days after the court gave the girls to Michael

CS Gaynor:      After the 9th of the 12th?

HEATHER:       Yes, on the 11/12  I was in town and the girls were there at the markets.

ARTHUR:         We are members of Rotary; by the way, we’re volunteers for Rotary and they run the markets so we’re all down with them.

HEATHER:       We were in there, Cassie was tickling the girls and the girls said “Mummy you’ve got to promise not to tickle us, because you are tickling us too much.” And she said “Ah, I can’t promise because you got to keep a promise when you make it.  She said and “Isabella” said “well Daddy doesn’t keep his promise, because he is still touching our privates.” Two days after custody.

CS Gaynor:      What does the mother do about that information?

ARTHUR:         I don’t know.

HEATHER:       She’s lost the children, because they said she was coaching and here they are.  It has come out two days later saying thing to anybody.

ARTHUR:         I have a copy of all the texts. It’s there if you’re interested.  If you’d like to photocopy them.  It’s not relevant.  There’s no text there.

CS Gaynor:      Nothing to do with Child Protection stuff on there.  Anyone making complaints?

ARTHUR:         No.

CS Gaynor:      What about Mum?  Mum’s hearing all this information, or she makes any comments.

ARTHUR:         I know she didn’t report a lot of these disclosures directly after she had the children taken from her because she was accused of coaching and she didn’t know what to do.

CS Gaynor:      She should be providing it to the authorities at the time.

HEATHER:       Yes, we thought that too, because on 24th January.

CS Gaynor:      Is it reported to the courts.

ARTHUR:         We don’t know we haven’t seen it.

CS Gaynor:      That’s up to her and not for you to be involved.

HEATHER:       On the 24th January the last year.

CS Gaynor:      Yep

HEATHER:       The girls were over for an access visit, Michael had appointed himself Supervisor.

CS Gaynor:      With Mum? Access visit?

HEATHER:       Yes, Michael as the supervisor.

CS Gaynor:      Right.  Was it out at your place?

HEATHER:       It was at our place.  Isabella was swimming with the mother and she revealed something to her mother and she dirtied her pants in the pool, so Cassie took the girls up for a shower and when Isabella had got dressed she came running out and jumped up on the lounge and her genital area was red to the point of near bleeding.

ARTHUR:         And I was sitting next to the father and little Isabella was in between us and I said to the father (She didn’t have her pants on).  I said to the father “Michael we’ve got a problem here, look at this” and he said “No” and he got all.  He went all funny didn’t he?

HEATHER:       Yes

ARTHUR:         He got up, walked around and sat down.

HEATHER:       He got up and sat down.

ARTHUR:         And I begged him and the mother which their supposed to do, to take Isabella to the doctor.

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

HEATHER:       He flatly refused.

ARTHUR:         He flatly refused.

CS Gaynor:      Do you know if he took the child after the access?

ARTHUR:         No.

HEATHER:       No.  He wouldn’t take them to a doctor.

NEVILLE:          How old are the children?

ARTHUR:         Five.

HEATHER:       They’d just turned five.

CS Gaynor:      Um.  So you don’t know if he took the child to the doctor?

ARTHUR:         No.

HEATHER:       He said they didn’t need to go.

CS Gaynor:      Yep

HEATHER:       Those were his words “she doesn’t need to go.”

ARTHUR:         What date was that?

HEATHER:       24th January.  There’s so many things that the girls have said that are of a sexual nature.  Then my daughter on the 15th January, we all went to the movies together and the girls weren’t happy and so she calmly said to Michael “the girls aren’t happy we need to talk about it.”  She put the girls in the car so it wasn’t as though she was cross and he just started shouting you just need to sort yourself out.  She said “what do you mean?”  “You know what I mean.”  He jumped into the car, slammed the door. He didn’t have his seat belt on.  Backed the car back and just missed another car coming into the parking area.  He’s supposed to have done things.  He’s not interested in the girls’ welfare or anything.

CS Gaynor:      And that’s something Mum needs to take up with the courts as well.  Do they do  mediation, do you know?

ARTHUR:         They did.  They started going to Relationships Australia in 2009.  I think the father went twice and said it wasn’t relevant and refused to return.

CS Gaynor:      And that’s before the court?

ARTHUR:         That’s before they broke up.

HEATHER:       That was two years before they broke up.

CS Gaynor:      It normally happens before they go to court.

HEATHER:       Apparently it was something special, but I don’t really know.

HEATHER:       Alright there is something on the 10th January that Isabella was crying.  She had soiled her pants again in swimmers again, but she wasn’t crying because of what Daddy had done that but he had told them they could have a sleep over and then he said they couldn’t.  You know, they could stay with Mummy for the night and he said they couldn’t.  That was the 10th January.

18th January Bronte told us that Daddy doesn’t like your family Mummy and we shouldn’t either.

CS Gaynor:      So once again, that’s all information that Mum should be providing.

ARTHUR:         But mother wasn’t there

HEATHER:       Oh she was.  She told Mummy in front of us.

ARTHUR:         She said it to me too.

HEATHER;       Well she did, she told her in the front of us.  Then after dinner they played their recorder to sexual songs.

CS Gaynor:      What does that mean?

HEATHER:       Well, their father playing these sexual songs on his phone while the girls were playing their recorder.  They were sexual tunes.

CS Gaynor:      What songs?

HEATHER:       Oh I can’t remember but they were songs the girls shouldn’t even be listening to.  Not five year olds.

ARTHUR:         Our dates might jump around a little bit.  We both keep separate diaries.  On the 12th January um I had the caravan serviced and I backed it into the shed and our pool has a gate there and a gate here and there’s a fence here that’s overlapped and you can walk in there and nobody knows you’re there.  Cassie and the girls were sitting there facing towards this way, towards the house and after I backed the caravan in I could hear them in the pool so I thought I would go around and give them a fright so I came around and I am leaning against the fence and the girls had just come back from Brisbane with their father and this was at 3 o’clock in the afternoon and Cassie said “You look tired Isabella, did you have a sleep before you come over.”  She said “yes, Bronte did but I had to go into Daddy’s bedroom and play with his privates and he played with mine.”  And I just stood there.  I just could not believe what I was hearing.  Then Bronte came over she was on this floaty thing and the mother said to Bronte.  “Bronte did you have a sleep before you came over today?”  Bronte said “Yes, I did but Isabella didn’t she had to go into Daddy’s room”.  That was on the 12th.  And if you care to visit our home it’s well worth a look.  Oops, sorry Nev.  We’ve got a long hallway and the girl’s bedroom was there, the mother’s bedroom was there.  There’s a hallway right up here, the kitchen’s there and there’s a lounge here and my spot’s in that corner and the TVs there and I watch the news.

CS Gaynor:      Yes

ARTHUR:         Anyhow last thing at night it was my job to tell them a story when they went to bed.

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

ARTHUR:         And we told them the story, there’s bed there, and bed there and fan there.  They’ve got all their pictures around the wall.  I tell them a story we give them a kiss and walk out and close the door then we would come out here.  Then when Cassie was ready to go to bed she would go to bed.

 

I get up at 5 o’clock every morning and I sit there watching the news and when those little girls woke up they’d open their door and they would peek out and then go back in and in a couple of minutes would come flying down the hallway and snuggle into me one each side and then they’d say “Pop, the boring news and they knew they had five minutes.  I could watch the news for five minutes, then have to go to 502 and that was ha ha.

HEATHER:       No Bronte wanted

ARTHUR:         503

HEATHER:       I can’t remember that one.

CS Gaynor:      That’s children’s shows?

ARTHUR:         Yes, and that’s what they did so they were never alone with their mother while they were there and they claim she was coaching them and they we all spent our time there.

HEATHER:       The mother was supposed to be coaching the children and yet she never, she never would say anything derogatory about the father. Ever, even when she was down about something he said to her.

CS Gaynor:      In all these circumstances were the girls Mum was there.  I would hope and assume that the mother has given notice.

ARTHUR:         I doubt it very much because she already lost the kids and they said if she ever coaches again or puts in false statements.

CS Gaynor:      Why wouldn’t she, if they were not false?

ARTHUR:         Of course they’re not false, I was there.  She’s dead scared. The Heilbronns’ have been

CS Gaynor:      Have you been into the police with her.

ARTHUR:         No I haven’t been to the police.  I’ve been to the police on many occasions.

CS Gaynor:      ?

ARTHUR:         No. No.

CS Gaynor:      You said as well the mother was sitting there with the children.

ARTHUR:         Yep.

HEATHER:       That afternoon when Isabella came and sat on the chair and jumped on the chair without any pants, I went through to the bedroom and Bronte was in the bedroom getting dressed after she had a shower and I just said to her “Um, goodness Isabella’s “tushka” they used to call it “tushka”

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

HEATHER:       looks really sore” and she said “that’s what happens when Daddy rubs us too hard there with his penis”

CS Gaynor:      Do you know if the children have been interviewed by the police?

ARTHUR:         Ah, many times I believe.  The event of 15th January.

HEATHER:       Isabella said that she didn’t want to stay with Daddy anymore as he is just too angry.

ARTHUR:         We all have a breakfast when they come over, Michael and everybody.

CS Gaynor:      So this is when Dad has had the children?

ARTHUR:         Yes, at our place.

GS Gaynor:     Mm Mm.

ARTHUR:         The Aunties and Uncles and cousins was there and it was said in front of Michael that he was too angry all the time.  Michael was furious and became withdrawn.

On the 4th January I offered to discuss Michael’s problems with him, he has severe behavioral problems.  Um, but he never mentioned it, he just ignored it.  On the 19th January 2012 during access the girls again complained of sexual interference by Daddy.  He takes each one of us into the bedroom to play with his penis and he plays with mine..

CS Gaynor:      And who did the children say this to?

ARTHUR:         Me.  I have kept the diaries there.  I’ve typed up to make it easy to.

CS Gaynor:      What date was that?

ARTHUR:         19TH January.

CS Gaynor:      Yep.

ARTHUR:         On the 20th January I phone the Sexual Abuse Hotline in Brisbane, as I didn’t know what to do and I was referred to Relationships Australia.  (Relationships Australia where are we?)  We met with um Matthew Power out there.

CS Gaynor:      Who’s Matthew Power?

ARTHUR:         You needed that?  He’s the, well when I rang the Sexual Abuse Hotline in Brisbane they referred me to Matthew Power in Thuringowa.

CS Gaynor:      That’s OK.  I’m glad you rang Sexual Abuse but I’m still just interested in the girls not yours.

ARTHUR:         No No, it was about the kids.  We reported this sexual abuse to Matthew Power.

CS Gaynor:      And what did he say?

ARTHUR:         I’ve got to notify the authorities and they will be in touch with you but they never ever have.  Now whether he notified the authorities or not I don’t know but he seemed a pretty genuine sort of a fellow and very concerned.

CS Gaynor:      Yes essential.  That was a good response.  Um, what date was that? Did you say that was last year?

ARTHUR:         No No

HEATHER:       20th January

ARTHUR:         Just let me look at the papers so that we get it right.

CS Gaynor:      It was the 19th?

ARTHUR:         Yes. Got it yes.

CS Gaynor:      January?

ARTHUR:         Yes, rang Brisbane for appointment.  That was on the 20th January I rang.

CS Gaynor:      Good.  That’s alright I was looking at the same.

ARTHUR:         I think it was three days later.

CS Gaynor:      Three days later?

ARTHUR:         Yes.

CS Gaynor:      Anything else after that time?

ARTHUR:         Yes.HEATHER:       There’s many times we’ve heard the girls say that Daddy says “Mummy doesn’t want them anymore, Mummy doesn’t love them anymore.”  You know that sort of thing.  They used to say that often.  And on the 3rd of October we were at our daughter’s birthday party.

CS Gaynor:      What date was that?

ARTHUR:         3RD October.

HEATHER:       3rd October last year.

CS Gaynor:      Yes

HEATHER:       Our daughter’s birthday party where Mum was under supervision and were all sitting around the table Isabella said “that Daddy said Bronte is a liar because he plays with our vagina but she’s not a liar, because he does it all the time”.  And then she said.  After a little while she said “Oh Daddy’s going to be very angry now Mummy.”

ARTHUR:         There six at the birthday party.

CS Gaynor:      Is that all?

ARTHUR:         I believe there were five signed statements went into the police and none of us have been interviewed about it.

 

24th January Isabella phoned her Mother and wanted to meet her at the school gate as she had something important to tell her.  Cassie at that stage could not go to the school and did not have Michael’s approval.  Cassie told Isabella she would be seeing her that afternoon.  They met at the Willows where Michael allowed the girls to shop for school bags because the girls didn’t have any.  Heather was at the centre.  Michael went to our place without the girls.  When they arrived they bought dinner which we all shared including Michael.  Cassie took the girls for a swim and Isabella dirtied her pants again.  This has happened several times since she has been in the care of the father and she was toilet trained two years before.

CS Gaynor:      Do you know if the children have been to get any psychological treatment?

HEATHER:       No.

ARTHUR:         Nothing.

CS Gaynor:      Do you know?

CS Gaynor:      He came to my place after the court order

ARTHUR:         No.  I do know.  He came to my place.  No I don’t know it wasn’t as far as I know

HEATHER:                   our place

ARTHUR:         28TH January will answer this question.  Michael phoned to say he wanted to see me.  I invited him over assuming that he wanted to discuss his depression.  He suffers from severe depression.  But to my surprise he arrived with a cold beer and forty odd pages of the order and reasoning of F.M. Coker

CS Gaynor:      28th January

ARTHUR:         January 2012

CS Gaynor:      Now you understand I need to know the role on the stuff about the children?

ARTHUR:         Yes. OK

CS Gaynor:      Everyday is not going to be about the children though.

ARTHUR:         No No.  He stayed for over an hour denigrating all the medical professionals, doctors, psychologists, pediatricians and counselors which the girls had visited under the advice from police and Child Safety.  The visit was clearly an attempt to get me to criticize Justice Coker’s ruling which I refused to do.  We accepted because he made that rule and you have to accept it.  I suggested that he and Cassie should take the girls to a psychologist to help them get over the break up.  Michael looked at me with a look I have never seen anybody with it like it before and said “I can assure you that the girls will not be seeing a psychiatrist.”  He said “I can assure you, psychologist sorry, that Cassie will never ever get those girls again.  I said “Michael” and he just jumped into the car and took off.  Now that was me suggesting to him, I didn’t push the point that the girls should have help and he flatly refused.

HEATHER:       Something 23rd January.  I meant June sorry.

ARTHUR:         Oh no I’ve got some more here.  That night after Michael left the mother got a phone call saying all access had been stopped.  The lot, from everybody, uncles, cousins, aunties, ourselves, he stopped all access and we haven’t had access since, so those little girls have been in a hostage situation since 5th February 2012.  It’s over twelve months now.  Heather and I went round on the Sunday morning, the morning after for an access visit and he let us in. OK and the girls were hiding in the bedroom, we went and found them and brought them out and they were very happy to see us.

CS Gaynor:      I thought you hadn’t seen them?

ARTHUR:         No this is the day after he stopped access

CS Gaynor:      Yes

ARTHUR:         he stopped access to the girls.

CS Gaynor:      Yes

ARTHUR:         It was on 5th February 2012.

HEATHER:       5th February

ARTHUR:         Sorry, 5TH February, 2012.  So we went around Sunday morning, Heather was inside and he called me outside and started asking questions and I made some statements to which I were truthful.  One was that I said that with the Child Sexual Abuse it’s very hard to know what’s happening and we’ve been doing research and I said its only four or five per cent of four and five years old who report these findings so he put that into an affidavit against me.  So that’s where I got the information from.  He ticked the boxes of what’s relevant and all those things are there if you want it.  That’s in relation to the girls.  (Handing over an information sheet from Bravehearts).

CS Gaynor:      Yes Yes that’s your interpretation of what’s wrong with them, is that right?

ARTHUR:         Yes. But that’s what’s happening to the girls with their behavior.

CS Gaynor:      Right.

ARTHUR:         And we haven’t had access since and ah, as I say we went to the police on so many occasions.

CS Gaynor:      Nothing else should be relevant from here because you haven’t had any other access with the children.

HEATHER:       They’ve been under supervision, court approved supervisors.

CS Gaynor:      Court ordered supervisors.

HEATHER:       Yes. The court ordered supervisors.  Yes, from I think it was about the 3rd or it might have been 1st April, so they have only ever been supervised.

CS Gaynor:      Who’s that with? Family?

ARTHUR:         Yes, court ordered yes.  The court approved supervisors.

CS Gaynor:      Court ordered to extended family is that right?

ARTHUR:         No no

CS Gaynor:      Their Mum?

HEATHER:       Their Mum, with the supervisors they might come over to our place, was coming over to our place occasionally.

CS Gaynor:      Yes

HEATHER:       Not all the time.  Maybe we would go over there to their place if, like Cassie’s place.

CS Gaynor:      Sorry, was that from 3rd or 4th.

HEATHER:       Yes

CS Gaynor:      Sorry, go on

HEATHER:       So we’ve sort of seen them but it’s always been under supervision

CPS Gaynor:    Yes

HEATHER:       Then on the 9th October it was just all stopped again and Cassie only sees the girls.  No phone contact.  Nothing.  Only sees the girls at Relationship Australia for an hour and three quarters every Sunday afternoon.

ARTHUR:         I’ve got a couple of other things here.  2nd April 2012 we went to Ross River Park with them and the supervisor for a picnic.  I took the pups down for the kids to play with and Bronte said “Pop?” (Hang on while I get this).  Bronte asked “Can we come home with you and Nan, Pop.”  I said “Dad will bring you back one day”.  Bronte replied “We don’t want to live with Daddy, he makes us cry all the time and he’s always angry.”  I replied “He would only get angry when you are naughty.”  Bronte said “No Pop, he’s angry all the time and does naughty things to us.”  That was on ah, 2nd April 2012 in front of the supervisors.

CS: Gaynor:     Mm

HEATHER:       The supervision must have started on the 1st April.

ARTHUR:         From the 10th of June we had a trampoline and swings at home we brought the girls and Cassie moved into a home in (the address, what was the number?)

HEATHER:       It’s Eyre Street.

ARTHUR:         Eyre Street, North Ward.  I loaded these swings up and took them around and put them in the back yard.

GS Gaynor:     Mm

ARTHUR:         And Rae Greaves was the supervisor that day.  I don’t know whether you know Rae or not, um, but she was the supervisor.  I relocated the swings and the trampoline from our home to Cassie’s home.  When I was leaving I said “Have fun on your swings and trampoline.”  Bronte whispered which was said in front of Rae Greaves.  Bronte and Isabella said “that Daddy had told them they would never be allowed to stay at Mummy’s house again.”  I said “That may change, he may change his mind.”  They then said “They have to go to Aunty Sheree’s house tomorrow.” the 11th, yes school holidays because “Daddy said Mummy didn’t want us anymore.”  I assured them, this is in front of their mother and the supervisor; I assured them that Mummy, Poppy, Nana and all our friends and relatives wanted to see them as much as we could.

HEATHER:       On 24th, 23rd June I was at the school being a teach aid.

CS Gaynor:      Any circumstances where the supervisors think the children are at risk are certainly advised of all the services.

HEATHER:       Yes, well I

ARTHUR:         We can’t be sure, no.

CS Gaynor:      Yes, go on.

HEATHER:       I was ready to go and I said to both girls to say goodbye and Isabella stood up and she goes.  She said “Tomorrow’s mummy day, and then the next day because tomorrow was Friday, Saturday they used to have access with Relationships Australia and then all day Sunday.  Tomorrow’s mummy day, the next day is mummy day.  Then she said “The only good days are mummy days.”

CS Gaynor:      What date is that?

ARTHUR:         You’ve got no idea what is happening with these kids.  (Heather was crying).

CS Gaynor:      It’s alright do you need time out?

HEATHER:       23RD June

ARTHUR:         The things they are saying, you couldn’t coach them if they had not experienced what they’re saying.  They not have the faintest idea.

On 8th March we visited Ewan Jones office regards to disclosures and been unable to talk to anybody.

On 12th March Matthew from Mr. Jones office rang and advised us to contact Stephen Cannon senior intake Officer at Child Safety on 49777900

On 15th March we rang Mr. Cannon’s office and we were assured that we would be contacted for an appointment.  It never ever happened.  Never.

CS Gaynor:      You do know now that you can make contact with us.  Where intake see it you don’t need that.

HEATHER:       No.

ARTHUR:         That’s your number there.

CS Gaynor:      Yes, you need to make contact me on the 1300 number and provide us with

Information any time.  And if you need to walk in for advice and information I’m happy to take that, as long as it is current information because historically information we have already been provided with and then we’ve got all those so um any new information we will take.

NEVILLE:          They’ve already been told the information you have just said.  I’m pretty

conversant.

CS Gaynor:      I’ve got to converse.

NEVILLE:          Yes, I have been with family relationships for forty years.

CS Gaynor:      Then you would know, you would know that anybody you have spoken to is

Provided with same.  We would like to say we don’t tape the information we don’t, if they pull in another person we will always say you need to advise this information.  As a justice body that is what we are required to do and we will always.

ARTHUR:         What date were we up to?

CS Gaynor:      Um lots of dates backwards and forwards. 23/06/2012 and that’s being

Supervised from 15th.

HEATHER:       It was too close 6/09, 11th

CS Gaynor:      1st November?

HEATHER:       Yes

CS Gaynor:      In context.

ARTHUR:         The father prevented the mother from going to the school, she was teacher’s

Aide as other parents, one day a week I think it was.

HEATHER:       That’s after 9th October.

ARTHUR:         And she was in the classroom with all the other mothers and the father claimed

That the mother was coaching the girls during the, you know this time in the class where the teacher is supervising and stopped her from going and then they made her go at 9.10am into class after the school had started and he still claimed they were coaching inside the class room and he stopped that.  And then my wife said well these little girls have to have contact with family so she got in touch with the Headmaster and said “Well look these girls blaa blaa blaa can I come and take over the place so the girls can have contact with the children and the father would not allow it.  Is that normal?

CPS Gaynor:    What, I think that it would’ve been up to the school.  Education Queensland run

their own policy so it would be up to them if they were willing to let it happen.

ARTHUR:         We got a letter from him

HEATHER:       It just said we could in another class.

ARTHUR:         The Headmaster he could’ve.

CS Gaynor:      An aide teacher.

HEATHER:       The class has a teacher’s aide.

CS Gaynor:      So he just goes up as a parent.  I think the children’s education is done under

their own policy so it’s obviously they made the decision under their own policy.

ARTHUR:         No. I don’t think so; we had a letter from them that said “The school does not

have a problem with the grandmother attending.

HEATHER:       But he’s the one that stopped it.

CS Gaynor:      Well, as far as I know, because you weren’t in the class with just them either.

ARTHUR:         With the mother, yes

HEATHER:       We just sit around and talk to the children and then they change.

CS Gaynor:      I would assume they would not make indication on their own ground.

ARTHUR:         All we wanted to do was keep contact with the kids.

HEATHER:       It was nothing like that.

CS Gaynor:      They would have to have some sort of order of some kind.  But understand we’re

State, we’re not Federal so I don’t know the Federal court rules in things like

That.   They would have to get a court rule something in policy.

ARTHUR:         This is a statement I put into the police.  It is about a disclosure.  Do you want me to read it out?  They’ve never been back to me.  It’s about the girls.

CS Gaynor:      But you have given them your information, we can’t keep on getting information like that because that is criminal.  We work on risk, we don’t work on that.

ARTHUR:         I was riding up the road.  I ride the push bike every morning.  Up along Riverway Drive and I was coming back and here was with the car with the two little girls in the back of it.  It was locked up in full sunshine and the father was in shopping and I tried to get in the car and I couldn’t, it was locked.  The motor wasn’t running.

CS Gaynor:      These were your little girls?

ARTHUR:         Yes.  No not that one, that is just an example.  So I waited there until the father

came out and he was furious.  He um

CS Gaynor:      What was the time frame?

HEATHER:       We don’t really know.

ARTHUR:         Well, it was.

HEATHER:       He rode up and they were in the car.

CS Gaynor:      When was that?

ARTHUR:         That was on 15th October, 2012. Oh no no no sorry about that I’ve got the wrong

one there.  That was the one you didn’t want to hear about.

HEATHER:       That was after that.

CS Gaynor:      If the police have every criminal information in relation about the children we will get it.

ARTHUR:         You haven’t got it.

(There was laughter about something I couldn’t understand what was said)

 ARTHUR:         OK, Heather was um, went up to the chemist for a prescription and she arrives

up there and there’s the little girls in the car again, full sunshine and didn’t know

where Michael was, so Heather went into the chemist shop and Michael’s in the

Chemist shop.  So, she said “Do you mind if I say hello to the girls?” in front of

everybody in the chemist shop. He said “yer, yer alright.”  So she went out and

she’s talking to the girls.

HEATHER:       Now, I like to take over from there because I was talking to the girls in the back

of the car.

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

HEATHER:       I’m this way and the girls there and the door’s open behind me and we were

chatting away and they were very excited to see me and Isabella was talking and she writes a diary.  She’s a very clever little girl and she’s telling me all about her tummy and eye drops and she couldn’t spell it, I can’t remember it now.  That’s

right, she had just drawn a drop, eye drop and we were chatting away and the next thing they both stopped and they just go like this. (indicating that the girls were looking up and then tooking into their laps).

CS Gaynor:    Mm Mm

HEATHER:      And I knew Michael was standing behind me and they were scared to talk to me.

ARTHUR:       When I was up at the bakery at the shopping centre and they were locked in the

car and I tried to get in there.

HEATHER:      They were laughing and carrying on.

ARTHUR:       When he came out he just flew into a rage, opened the door and slammed it and he wouldn’t even allow me to say hello.  That’s not good.

HEATHER:      He’s got them like.  He’s got nobody he has to answer to.

CS Gaynor:    Well I guess  the children are at a questionable age, six.

HEATHER:      Yes.  Several months ago.  I mean they both go to school.

CS Gaynor:    So you’ve got either of the children at school, but the schools have the policies

around what is appropriate and what’s not appropriate about that so they

certainly look for any change of behaviors and things like that.  Certainly they

have that policy there.  It’s not under our policy, but they certainly have a policy

that making sure they adhere.

HEATHER:      I feel they like school, they really love it because they’re away from the angry

Daddy.

ARTHUR:       The father has serious behavior and mental problems and I have a letter here

from his grandmother she wrote me if you wish to read it.

HEATHER:      This is back in.

CS Gaynor:    Is this a medical person or somebody just saying something.

ARTHUR:       His grandmother telling me.

CS Gaynor:    Why is his grandmother writing?

ARTHUR;       Because she is concerned about him if you read it and every week after they got

married for months his mother would ring me and say “Please, look after

Michael.  Could you get him to contact me?”  And I would

CS Gaynor:    Patricia

ARTHUR:       That’s his mother.  His mother’s a psychopath, schizophrenically I believe.

HEATHER:      Goodness knows, his father was habitual.

CS Gaynor:    So how does that make him a schizophrenic?

ARTHUR:       I didn’t suggest that no.  I just asked you to read the letter.

CS Gaynor:    But you said he’s got mental health issues.

ARTHUR:       Well, he has

HEATHER:      Because he complains all the time about having depression and other stuff he

brings up.  In fairness to that because he was in a bad accident at six.

CS Gaynor:    So this is about he and his Mum.

HEATHER:      It’s mainly about his health.

ARTHUR:       Mainly about his behavior, deserting his mother.

HEATHER:      And how could he treat his mother this way.

ARTHUR:       She said “That the worst mother in the world deserves better treatment than he

gives her.  And these are things I have observed.  I knew there were problems in

the family Christmas 2010 because they came around and opened up the

presents and there was just silence.  The girls were very jaded.  They opened

their presents, there was no excitement and when they left he went and jumped

in the car and drove off.  And I said to my daughter “Is everything alright.”  Her

eyes just filled with tears and she said “Yes”

On the 20th November

CS Gaynor:      Going backwards

ARTHUR:         No, we’re on Michael’s depression and his disclosures he has given me.

HEATHER:       He is aware and knows about them.

ARTHUR:         Yes he does.

CS Gaynor:      I want to know about the children, I don’t want to know about him.  I wantabout the girls.

ARTHUR:         Well, the risk, if you listen, to the girls could be great. Ah. Beg your pardon?

On 20/11 we were supervising, and this was before he got the children,

He got them on 7th December.  So it was before he got the children

through the court.  It was on 20th November, it was a Sunday and we

went down to the beach and we let them run free which we stayed

right away from them.

CS Gaynor:      When was this?

ARTHUR:         20/11

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

ARTHUR:         And then we went back to Lolly Pops at the Main Central and we sat well away

Having a cup of coffee and they were playing and they came over and sat down.

I noticed Michael was crying, and he was white and shaky and the girls just

closed down completely.  I never said anything, I just watched and about ten

minutes later things seem to smooth out and ah I just never said a word to him.

On 4th January it was the girls’ birthday party with approximately 40 children

there and adults.  The father didn’t get involved at all in conversation with the

guests or take part in any proceedings of the party what so ever.  He went inside

after the barbecue was cooked and appeared pale, trembling and was crying and

looked and he was distant, His manner was very distant.  When I asked him

what the matter was he said he was suffering from severe depression and had

done for years.  He would not eat.  After about twenty minutes, because I sat

there and talked to him, Michael settled down and he did come out and eat

some of the food, but he still did not mix with the guests or any of the friends.

CS Gaynor:      May I ask you something?  Did the Mum make any comment about this in the

Court orders?

ARTHUR:         I have no idea, I haven’t seen them.

HEATHER:       I don’t know.  I don’t know what’s in her affidavits or anything.

CS Gaynor:      So you don’t know anything about that.  But she lives in the home with you and

You don’t know anything about that.

ARTHUR:         She moved house.  She was in our home at the time, yes.

CS Gaynor:      And you don’t know if she has made any comments about it.

ARTHUR:         The solicitor told us that we have to be independent of each other, that we can’t

collude.

On 8th January access visit by Mick and the girls, he stayed very quiet and

strained distant.  He accepted a soft drink but we could not connect with him at

all.

On 10th January during another visit Michael again he said he suffered from

depression and has done for years.  I offered my sympathy and told Mick I was

available any time he wanted to come to talk to me, if he wanted to talk about

his problems.  He said “Thank you that would be good.”

On 17th January Mick again was very distant but accepted a glass of wine after

Dinner and left with a blank look on his face without saying “goodbye” or “thank

You”.

22nd January Mick very jubilant and bragging about how good it was to be single

again and how much he was enjoying life at present.  This

behavior seemed to be in stark contradiction to how he normally behaved.

We’ve never seen him on such a high with his emotions ever.  The twins barely

spoke to him during the visit and were overly subdued.

24th January Mick visited with the girls and very happy until Isabella had a

shower after swimming.  I think you’ve got some of this.  She had no pants on

yer. Doesn’t need to go to a doctor, his attitude changed and the next thing he

became very aggressive, irritated and edgy.  He could not keep still, kept on

getting up until he left.

28th January, we’ve discussed this.  When Mick turned up I thought he was going

to talk about his depression, but he didn’t.  I was standing at the front gate with

Mr. Manser on the, this is 3rd October 2012

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

ARTHUR:         I was standing at the front gate with Mr. Manser who’s a sheet metal worker

And Michael drove past with the girls on the way to school.  He gave me the

wave and speeded up in front of the girls.

These are a few of the worst ones.

HEATHER:       I might add that he comes out (2010) especially when we have friends there,

2011 we had friends there but I also had the girls while he was there.  Michael

didn’t ever take notice of the girls while they opened up their Christmas

presents.

CS Gaynor:      Mm Mm

HEATHER:       More significantly the girls never went near him and even when he was

supervised.  He used to come to our place he would walk in with his phone,

either playing on his phone or talking on his phone. Um he’d take a beer out of

the fridge.

ARTHUR:         He wouldn’t ask he would just go and get it

HEATHER:       If it wasn’t to his liking he would just complain about the brand of the beer, go

and sit in a corner in front of the TV.

ARTHUR:         And to this day we’ve never been rude to him, ever.  We wanted the thing to

survive.

CS Gaynor:      Alright, is that it?

ARTHUR:         Yes basically.  I’ve got a couple of questions.  You say you don’t give out

Information and I probably accept, I will accept.  Did the Heilbronns’ contact

Child Safety.

HEATHER:       She can’t tell us anything.

CS Gaynor:      If the Heilbronns’ asked me if you contacted us

ARTHUR:         I know mm.

CS Gaynor:      All information is confidential, so any information that we have is certainly not

Information for us to give.  Alright.

HEATHER:       See they threatened, the last thing they said as they walked out the door the

day they were at our place on 8th October, we’re going to Authorities and

you’re going to lose those children within a week.

ARTHUR:         I tell you what he wasn’t far wrong.

HEATHER:       Because she lost them.

CS Gaynor: Now with regard the information you gave me, like I said, you can contact

Records of Information used to be Freedom of Information is called the Record

of Information now.  Um I think they would have a web site.  It has to be

relevant for them to provide you with that information.  The information that

you’re involved in.  You’ve got that.  It’s up to you if you want to get information

around.

ARTHUR:         Not really I just want these little girls looked after.  Why are they still with him?

I even went as far as I could.  You know I went and saw Ewan Jones, got onto

Matthew Lupi and never got a reply, so I wrote to the Commissioner for

Children in Brisbane.  Once again, they’ve done nothing.

CS Gaynor:      You don’t know.

ARTHUR:         Well, they’re still there.

CS Gaynor:      I mean, you don’t know what information has been provided and we don’t

accept that because the Agency doesn’t do that, because that would mean

identifying um information that has been received so we don’t get any of

that.  So, all I can say to you is “all information we get is obvious on the system

it just stays on our system; we don’t do family law so the Federal system is

something that is not us.  We work on the risk of the children.  Federal work on

the court system.  We don’t have any involvement, unless somebody wants to

go further and we become involved in investigations and things like that.  Now

that’s something that’s done through the State and once again its around policy

and procedure so if anything um we have to um go by the information

received.  We make our decisions according to our policy.

ARTHUR:         So no doubt, as Child Safety we’ve given you the date.

CS Gaynor:      Yes

ARTHUR:         The children were with the father between.  The father has been given too

much time if you consider our statements false.

CS Gaynor:      No we don’t consider anybody’s statement is false.  Everybody from community

members to services, organizations, departments provides us with information.

We take it as right.  We don’t consider information as false.

ARTHUR:         You see the father’s claimed the mother has mental problems.

CS Gaynor:      Yes, but what I’m saying to you is we don’t work on, we don’t work the Federal

System, certainly State Government.  The courts they’ve got all this information

already.

ARTHUR:         Well, they haven’t because nobody’s got it.  Only you have got it now.

CS Gaynor:      But you don’t know what has.

ARTHUR:         Well there’s things in here that Mum hasn’t heard.

HEATHER:       Well Mum most probably given them a whole lot, because the girls would say

lots of stuff in front of supervisors.

ARTHUR:         Phone calls

HEATHER:       Yes, we don’t know about.

CS Gaynor:      A lot of stuff that has been said in front of Mum and a lot of stuff said in front

of Supervisors and things like that as well.

ARTHUR:         There’s a lot of stuff in here that’s full of it of phone calls and things like that.

The girls rang up one afternoon, they start complaining.  Phone call ends

Immediately.  There’s no phone contact now.  They are not allowed to ring us up.

Nothing.

CS Gaynor:      Yes and I guess Mum as the other guardian of the children.

HEATHER:       She’s not.  She’s doesn’t have any say.

ARTHUR:         He’s the sole parent at the moment.

CS Gaynor:      OK so that’s the court ruling is it?

ARTHUR:         Yes.

CS Gaynor:      So you know what the court ruling is?

ARTHUR:         Well, yes it was on 7th December.

HEATHER:       9th December Arth.

CS Gaynor:      He’s the sole guardian of the children?

ARTHUR:         Yes.  That was F.M. Coker and we go back to court on 22nd January and in his

Judgment he said this is for a very short period, didn’t he?

HEATHER:       No, because in February it was supposed to go back.

ARTHUR:         Well February.  7th December to February.  It was about eight weeks.  No,

Eleven, it wasn’t twelve and it was supposed to go back and be resolved then.

CS Gaynor:      Yep

ARTHUR:         And, of course, the normal thing it has been adjourned right through.

HEATHER:       Yes, it was supposed to with the order that both parents discuss the welfare of

the children.  That’s something that has not been adhered to.

CS Gaynor:      She’s not privy to the information In that.  I mean, both parents have to take their information to court, they can’t just front up without.  Don’t quote me I’ve no idea why it’s been put off until alater date, unless somebody is saying I’ve got some more information. You’ve got to get some more information, more information.  That’s something, if anyone has got relevant information that it’s in court.

ARTHUR:         That’s all very well but I think in November there was no information could go

Into the court after 20th November last year from memory.  Something like that.

CS Gaynor:      Well, as far as I know, all I know is both parents should have legal

Representation.

ARTHUR:         Well, the father is on $85.000 a year.  He got legal aid.  The mother’s bankrupt

and she can’t get it.

CS Gaynor:      Well, I don’t know much about that.  I honestly don’t know how they do that.

They have their.  As far as I know Legal Aid have a set um rate as to what they

get involved.  I don’t know about Mum why she doesn’t get it.

ARTHUR:         They wouldn’t give it to her.

HEATHER:       I think they wouldn’t give it to her in the first place because she was living with

us.

CS Gaynor:      Right.  So if there’s any adjournments and things like that she’s got legal

representation, it maybe um, or maybe she should be going back and seeking

legal and seeking legal aid now.

ARTHUR:         She can reapply can she?

CS Gaynor:      Well, I don’t know.  She’s in a different circumstances maybe she can.  She

certainly needs to be conversant.

HEATHER:       At the moment she cannot.

CS Gaynor:      Like I said I’m not sure.

ARTHUR:         What’s you name please?

CS Gaynor:      Gaynor.

ARTHUR:         Gaynor?

CPIU Gaynor:  G A Y N O R.

ARTHUR:         Ms  Miss  Mrs.

CS Gaynor:      Ms.  (Why was Ms Williams not given to us).

(There was general chit chat)

 ARTHUR:         Thanks for your time.  That’s full of stuff that we haven’t discussed in relation to

the kids if you want it.  You’re welcome to it.

CS Gaynor:      Well, I think you have given me a good grounding on what’s there.  It will

certainly be documented.  Now use your other processes you’ve got for any

other information.  Alright?  Don’t feel you have to come in here to make

appointments or anything.  You can call any time.  Everybody here is an

Intake officer.  If you get one of the other regional intakes, because we’re busy and it overflows everybody in the main office is an intake officer, alright?

ARTHUR:         OK, we’ll come in certainly.  Thank you for the advice.  As far as

CS Gaynor:      You call us, just give us call and that saves you distress.

ARTHUR:         As far as the police goes.

CS Gaynor:      That’s another matter, not us

ARTHUR:         Hang on, as I say I was speaking with the Detective Senior Detective Sergeant

David Miles?

CS Gaynor:      Yes

ARTHUR:         And he will not talk to us, he said the case is finished.

CS Gaynor:      He’s the big boss.

ARTHUR:         Why won’t they interview us?

NEVILLE:          If they suspect the children are in danger they should do something about it.

CS Gaynor:      Well

(Once again there was a chit chat between CPIU, Neville and Arthur)

 CS Gaynor:      Do you know how many times they have interviewed the children?  I’ve got

No idea and I’ve been involved or what the information has been taken and

what they’ve done.  I guess you don’t know what’s been going on with

interviews and anything like that, but all I can say is that they’ve certainly,

they’re certainly their own um they’re totally separate to us because of their.

ARTHUR:         What about all these statements that are going in and they don’t even bother

to ring up and confirm.  On 2011 last year the cricket.

HEATHER:       Oh, the 26th January last year.

ARTHUR:         They went down to the cricket and Michael was playing cricket, that’s the father

and the girls were there with, I don’t know the girl’s name even, met her once

only, it wouldn’t know her if I fell over her.

HEATHER:       She was a supervisor.  She was there with Cass.

ARTHUR:         Anyhow, it doesn’t matter.  These kids are playing and she’s got twins too and

they’re playing and the two girls opened up and started telling tem what Daddy

does do them.

HEATHER:       And this girl was a third year, she’s a um, what do you call it, an older, she’s in

Her early 30’s I think

CS Gaynor:      Right

HEATHER:       Third year medical student.

CS Gaynor:      Oh, I see

ARTHUR:         So she rang Child Safety, she rang the CPIU and they have never acknowledge

receiving it.

NEVILLE:          Something wrong.

ARTHUR:         Something wrong.

CS Gaynor:      You don’t know.

ARTHUR:         She said that she has never been contacted.

CS Gaynor:      OK

ARTHUR:         Never ever.

CS Gaynor:      Alright I can’t give you any feedback on that I’m sorry.  We don’t interact

when it comes to information.

ARTHUR;         No I understand that, but she reported here and she reported it to police

and never had a response from either party.

CS Gaynor:      Yep.  We don’t provide feedback.

ARTHUR:         Don’t you question them and make you know, get details.

CS Gaynor:      We don’t provide feedback.  If we’ve got enough information we don’t provide any feedback at all.  Like I said becomes confidential.  That’s as far as we can go.  The Queensland policy is that any interview is that.

ARTHUR:         I thought that what’s in the best interest for the children.

CS Gaynor;      It’s absolutely is in the best interest for the children and we make sure it is.

ARTHUR:         Thank you.

HEATHER:       Thank you very much for your time.

CS Gaynor:      Tut ta.

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

 

89 total views, no views today

What an absolute disgrace the so called Child Safety Department is ! #Leak59 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 59

 

More evidence of ineptitude , lack of caring and NIL professionalism by the system !

Lupi – Saunders – Gaynor , your department and the three of you are an absolute disgrace !!

                     PUBLICLY RE INVESTIGATE THIS MATTER !!

Ms Kirsty Saunders

Senior Advisor (Client Relations – Child Safety)

61 Sturt Street

Townsville   Qld   4810

 

 

Dear Ms Saunders,

We would like to bring to your notice the disappointment of the negative way in which an interview was conducted by the department’s interviewing person who induced herself as (Ms) Gaynor of the Department of Child Safety, on the morning of Monday 4th March 2013 at about 9.20am

It would appear that she was not interested in what was in the best interests of the children, namely our grandchildren, Isabella & Bronte Watter. We gave up in the end as we felt that we were speaking with someone who had preconceived ideas and was therefore not interested in the revelations of the sexual molestation by the father, Michael Watter, to the girls, with the information that was put before her.

Mr Neville Abbey of N.Q. Grandparents in Need of Support Council was horrified at the department’s aggressive interview tactics. Mr Abbey was not permitted to speak or enter into the conversation and came away, as we also did, very disillusioned with the system.

I invite you to listen to the first 20mins of the interviewing persons recorded interview with ourselves. We would appreciate your comments.

Our reports of direct sexual abuse made by these little girls against their father to the very people they love and trust appear to be of no relevance, with the Department saying that these were criminal matters and that we should be speaking with police about them.

You will note by viewing the information which we had already presented to the Department, through Lana, that we have been trying to contact your Department and the police for 12mths without success. Also you will note that the transcript of our conversation with the CPIU and their refusal to interview us.

The Department refused to give us written acknowledgement of our concerns and would not confirm that they would act on the limited information which we supplied to the Department.

Both of us have separate diaries with accurate accounts of events which have occurred over the past eighteen months.

The Department was handed a completed indicator of child sexual assault form. (Ms) Gaynor glanced at it and handed it back with the comment, ‘That’s your opinion, isn’t it?’   Well! It wasn’t our opinion. It is the facts.

The Department officer was also handed a letter from Mr Watter’s grandmother confirming that Mr Watter has severe behavioural problems. This also was glanced at then handed back.

We also wanted to report that we feel that these children have had their basic human rights taken away from them and feel that they are in a hostage situation as Bronte and Isabellas’ father has ceased all contact with the mother’s side of the family including ourselves, their aunties, uncles, cousins and friends. To stop all contact with the very people that these little girls loved and trusted is clearly not in the best interest of the children. The father, Michael Watter, has also stopped all contact at the Hermit Park State School where the girls attend school. To whom are these children now able to confide in, now that all the people that they love and trust have been taken away from them?

These breaches of our grandchildren’s rights have been in place since 28th January 2012 and more so since 9th October 2012 when even phone access with the girls was terminated.

Please advise to whom we report these abuses, as soon as possible.

We look forward to an early response to our concerns.

We also request an acknowledgement of this e-mail.

Yours faithfully

Heather & Arthur Doubleday

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

95 total views, no views today

BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN DADDY RUBS US TOO HARD WITH HIS PENIS !! #Leak57 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 57
Photograph taken of severely abused vagina ! No wonder the father refused to take her to the doctor !! Why would he ?

The girls say the vagina’s are that way because “ BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN DADDY RUBS US TOO HARD WITH HIS PENIS “ !!! This information just does not stop — what do you say Michael Watter ? What do all the blind people say ?

This certainly tells us what kind of person Stephen Heilbronn is ! Watch this space !

Why was the photograph not allowed in court ? Perhaps the judge might answer that question ?

                                                                RE INVESTIGATE

 Hi Trish,
Section 2 & 3 of my statement. Stephen Heilbronn told Arth & I on 8th October 2011 that Cassie had been sexually abused by her older brother on a daily basis from the age of 8 to 16. I was totally shocked then but after some thought believed that he (Stephen Heilbronn) had just been trying to frighten us but then after more thought I felt that something could have happened as our Stephen has always said that he was the ‘Biggest Disappointment in the Family.’(as per Slim Dusty’s song.) I challenged him when he said it again some months later when he was visiting and said that I had never told him that he was a disappointment, but because of the accusation from Stephen Heilbronn and the fact that Stephen refused to make a statement refuting the accusation, I suspected that something must have happened, so I was not very surprised when it came out in court as true. I think that I felt more relief for Cassie to have finally gotten the truth out which was a considerable release for her, and also the fact that, what had happened to Cassie, certainly didn’t alter the fact that two little girls were telling us so much about the sexual abuse being perpetrated against them by their father.
I certainly now feel considerable disappointment towards our son but he was old enough to know right from wrong when he first abused Cassie and a grown   man when he raped her. He made the choices and must make his own amendments.
With regard to No 5, Michael’s response:- Arth did not steal the ride-on mower.
6. Again Michael’s response:- I did photograph Isabella’s badly inflamed and red raw vagina because her father refused to take her to the doctor even thought Bronte told me that Isabella was so red, ‘Because that’s what happens when Daddy rubs us too hard with his penis.’ There is a vast difference between pornography and medical evidence. I believe, Trish, that you are holding the photo. Should this be tendered in court?
WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

101 total views, no views today

Sharing the sexual abuse of your children with your friends ! You DISGUSTING animal ! #Leak56 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 56

Another analysis from another professional person ! They keep coming and yet the authorities continue to sweep all the evidence under the carpet ! WHY do you think this is ? Disclosures of sexual abuse to their mother , their grandparents , grandparent’s friends , a doctor ( GP ) , a child psychologist and all this before further disclosures to all and sundry and yet no re investigation ! Cassie’s natural reaction was HORROR ! Records of these disclosures made in great detail and yet NEVER investigated ! Medical problems associated with sexual abuse – mouth ulcers , thrush and rectal bleeding .

The sickening aspect of this over and above the sexual abuse was the further disclosure that the father ( we use the word loosely , as what “ father “ would do this to their own children ? ) has punished his daughters for disclosing the sexual abuse !

Matthew Lupi, Regional Director of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services — you are an ABSOLUTE DISGRACE !!

Note the comments by Dr.Wendy Foote !

Note police officer David Miles comments – David Miles you are also a disgrace !

NOTE the disclosures that “ DADDY ‘S FRIENDS WERE ABUSING THEM “ – don’t worry FRIENDS – your time is coming !! Disclosure to this effect made by both of the little girls . No wonder the father doesn’t want to share our links to his page . You DISGUSTING animal !

Note the child’s pleading “ MUMMY HELP ME PLEASE “ . Desperate and continued pleas for help !

All those of you with blinkers on should be ashamed of and disgusted with yourselves !

Please help us to bring this mother and her children out of hiding so that they may receive the specialist counselling that will so desperately be needed .

YOU the authorities are to blame for this ! WAKE UP !

                                  PUBLICLY RE INVESTIGATE !!

Why I think the Child Safety Services should give serious consideration to the evidence reported in this document re the child protection risks of returning the 7 year old Watter twins (B and I: dob 4th

Jan 2007) to their father’s care if/when they are found.

 

Dr Rosamund Thorpe

President Family Inclusion Network Townsville

29th May 2014 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 My involvement and contact with Cassie Watter between January 2012 and April 2014 .

I first met the Watter twins’ mother, Cassie (Catherine) Watter, on 16th February 2012. She had been referred to FIN Townsville by the NQDVRS (North Queensland Domestic Violence Resource Service), as there had been Child Safety involvement prior to a Family Court interim judgement on 9th December 2011.

During 2012 I met Cassie every two or three weeks and very gradually learned that:

 

  1. She and one of the twins (I) had been granted a 12 month Protection Order in October 2011. Cassie and her husband (the twins’ father) had attended counselling in relation to domestic violence with Matthew Power at Relationships Australia in 2009, when the twins were aged 2
  2. Cassie and the twins had left the family home on 21st August 2011 (when the twins were 4½ years), when Cassie grew concerned that the domestic violence which she had experienced was impacting adversely on the twins (“this is a scary house” one of the twins had said, according to Cassie). The tipping point came when Cassie had formed the opinion (from observation of the father’s and the twins’ behaviour) that the twins’ father might be sexually attracted to and possibly abusing the twins.
  3. Cassie and the twins moved to live at Cassie’s parents’ home during which time the twins made several disclosures of sexual abuse to (1) their mother in the hearing of their grandparents and also their grandparents’ friends; (2) directly to each of the grandparents; (3) a GP; (4) a child psychologist to whom Cassie had taken the twins as she wanted someone independent to assess whether they had actually experienced sexual abuse. At this time Cassie had been incredulous about such an horrific reality. [Records of these disclosures have been provided by the grandparents and their friends, and by the Child Psychologist, Carolyn Seri]
  4. As a result of the disclosures outlined above, Cassie overcame her incredulity and made several reports to Child Safety. These were investigated by CSO Merle McNulty at the Thuringowa office who initially had seemed to Cassie to be sympathetic to her concerns. Merle McNulty abruptly seemed to change her attitude (sometime in October 2011, I think) after Cassie had told her that she and her parents were going to confront the twins’ father with the disclosures when he next called to collect them for a contact visit. [The question put to Mr Watter was: “The girls say you’re interfering with them. Is this correct?”] The reason for Merle McNulty’s change of mind bewildered Cassie for many months. However, enlightenment came over a year later when Cassie read in the Police records, subpoenaed by the Family Court, that on a phone call to the Police in (I think) October or November 2011, Merle McNulty had reported Cassie had said she was going to “set up” the father. This was not an accurate reporting of Cassie’s statement that she was going to “confront” the girl’s father with what the girls were disclosing. Rather, it is a highly misleading paraphrase, implying the situation was a mischievous contrivance based on false allegations. From this point on Merle McNulty appeared to Cassie to consider that her reported disclosures of CSA (child sexual abuse) by the twins were false, and that Cassie was coaching the twins to make disclosures. I understand, however, that no clear firm evidence of coaching was ever given to Cassie or to the Family Court
  1. On 9th December 2011 an interim order was made by the Family Court, granting full custody to the father, and only supervised access to Cassie. This order was based only on written Affidavits with no opportunity for testing through cross examination of the claims made. In the father’s Affidavit he had made what Cassie asserts were untrue and grossly exaggerated statements about her childhood and her adult mental health. In consequence, it would appear, the Family Court considered Cassie needed to access psychiatric treatment before the court could consider shared custody of the twins.

Everything in points 1 to 6 above (except the last 2 sentences of point 4 – BOLD) had happened prior to my meeting Cassie who, when I met her, was extremely distressed. This distress was not only on account of losing custody of the twins, but also a result of continuing to hear the twins make further disclosures about sexual abuse by their father during supervised contact visits with her.

Throughout 2012 (twins aged 5 years) a large number of written reports (over 40, I think) were made by people supervising Cassie’s contact with the twins. These, I understand, were submitted to the Family Court appointed Independent Children’s Lawyer (ICL) for the twins (Joanne Meade) and (I think) to Child Safety. Every Supervisor’s Report was forwarded by the ICL to the father and the twins began to disclose to Cassie that, as well as experiencing CSA by their father, he also had punished them for telling their mother about the CSA on contact visits.

With my support as president of FIN, Cassie sought an appointment with Matthew Lupi, Regional Director of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services, to request a review of the decisions made by Merle McNulty et al. At a meeting with him on Thursday 9th  August 2012 I was astonished to hear Matthew Lupi himself state, as if it were a proven fact, that parents caught up in Family Court custody disputes often make false allegations in order to achieve an order against the other party. This view has been described by Dr Wendy Foote (2006, 2010, 2011) as the “scepticism paradigm” which flies in the face of extensive research evidence that the rate of false allegations in the Family Court are no different than the rate of false allegations in any other context, including Child Safety – that is between 5 to 9% (Brown et al 1998; 2007). Despite the weight of this research evidence, Foote found that many professionals involved with the Family Court think and act as if the rate of false accusations is far higher than below 10% and thereby fail to take such reports seriously. Cassie certainly found that her reports were dismissed and, in consequence, the very services with the mandate to protect children, arguably, were responsible for them being left in an unsafe situation. As Cassie’s support person I could see how deeply distressing this was to Cassie as she felt she was prevented from protecting her children

Cassie’s experience was reinforced in early September 2012 by the CPIU of the Police in Townsville when Detective Dave Miles told her that (1) she was to stop making reports of disclosures of CSA as police investigations distressed the girls and thus emotional harm is (and would be) substantiated against her; and (2) that if in future he heard that Cassie had looked at the girls’ sore genital areas she would be charged with an offence. I know that this happened as I have viewed the video recording of Cassie’s interview with Dave Miles, and I have read a transcript of this interview.

As a FIN professional volunteer I also supported Cassie at an interview with Dallas Grant (Child Safety Officer) at the Thuringowa Child Safety Service Centre on Friday 7th September 2012. Dallas appeared to consider that there might be some substance to the CSA reports. However, the Child Safety/Department of Communities’ ultimate decision, both to Dallas’ investigation and to the Review undertaken through Matthew Lupi, was not to change the original decision made by Merle McNulty. It was, and continues to be, unclear to me how this outcome was “in the best interests” of the twins, given the sheer volume of reports made by contact supervisors of disclosures they heard made by the twins.

It remains utterly bewildering to me that most of the professionals (GP, Child Psychologist), contact supervisors (many of whom were professionals) and wider family members and friends of Cassie, have never been interviewed by either Child Safety or the Police. I have been informed by a previous senior staff member of Child Safety that “the skill in quality investigation and assessments of matters with conflicting information is to look for sound reliable sources of subsidiary information/evidence that corroborates one or other direct sources of information. There should be extensive information gathering from a variety of sources and complex analysis of this to weigh up all evidence. Analysis of how and why various sources have been weighted over others and how this has led to the ultimate judgement of what if any harm occurred, to what level of significance, by whom, and whether the risk of harm will continue in the current environment” [name withheld, personal communication, October 2012]. In the case of the twins, the making of decisions without canvassing (let alone complex analysis of) all sources of information should, in my view, be considered grossly inadequate and unprofessional practice, amounting to a   possible case of systems abuse of vulnerable young children.

In early 2013 I supported Cassie while viewing video recordings of several interviews with each of the twins by the Police in the presence of a Child Safety officer.   Although my primary purpose was to support Cassie, I could not avoid forming the impression that (1) the interviews were conducted by the Police with a view to obtaining sufficient evidence (beyond reasonable doubt) to charge and prosecute an abuser; and (2) Child Safety appeared to take a back seat and did not appear to consider the extensive disclosures made by the girls “on the balance of probabilities”. By contrast, from what I heard the girls disclose in the interviews, I formed the opinion that they said more than enough to prompt action to protect the girls from the risk of future abuse. In my view, what the girls disclosed could not possibly have been the result of coaching by a mother who only had closely supervised contact with them. The contextual details of sexual abuse provided by the girls were astonishing, and one girl’s claim, after 3 days in foster care, that the memories were a dream suggested to me that coaching by the father (who had unsupervised contact 24/7 with the girls) of what to say to the police was an alternative possibility worthy of serious consideration.

I know that a complaint by Emeritus Professor Freda Briggs (a respected academic with expertise in child development and CSA) to the CMC prompted a review of the police interviews undertaken by Craig Weatherly and on 6th August 2013 I supported Cassie in a meeting with Craig to discuss his investigation. To my knowledge the CMC’s appraisal of Craig’s Report has not been released, although I am aware that in early 2014 Craig offered to “mediate” between Cassie and Police Detective Dave Miles. It was unclear precisely what the focus of such mediation might be and it did not happen before Cassie disappeared on 4th April 2014

In my view Child Safety Services need to undertake an independent review of the videoed police interviews with the Watter twins from a child centred perspective of assessing risk of harm rather than gathering evidence for a criminal prosecution of an adult. Furthermore, in my view, when the twins are found I would hope that they are interviewed in a far more child-friendly manner, preferably by a qualified child therapist with a prime focus on the best interests of the children.

During 2013 (twins aged 6 years) and in the first 3 months of 2014 I continued to support Cassie in the Family Court and through many months when she had only 2 hours supervised contact with the twins at the Relationships Australia Contact Centre. On 8th May 2013 I supported Cassie in a meeting with Contact Centre staff in which Cassie sought clarification of the Contact Centre supervisor’s apparent inclination to perceive “whispering” between Cassie and the twins and to interpret this as coaching – the latter fiercely denied by Cassie, who has a very soft voice.

The whispering claim is complicated by the fact that during 2013 the twins sometimes did make disclosures to Cassie, but not in the hearing of the Contact Centre supervisor. Cassie was of the view that the twins had become adept telling her what was happening to them while avoiding the punishment they would have to endure if reports got back to their father.

I came to realise that Cassie felt caught in a terrible “double-bind” (Bateson et al 1956). On the one hand she was concerned about the continuing abuse of the twins yet she feared several unwelcome repercussions if she lodged any reports: (1) the reports would be interpreted as false (the “scepticism paradigm” in operation) and therefore regarded as prima facie evidence that she had coached the twins to say what they said and, in consequence, the twins would not be assessed as in need of protection and would be left in an environment where the CSA might continue; (2) even the very limited contact Cassie had each week would be stopped and she would not be able to see her twins at all; (3) Dave Miles would charge her with an offence.

From mid 2013 into early 2014 (twins aged 6-7years) Cassie clearly became increasingly distressed by disclosures the twins were quietly making to her on contact visits (unheard by the contact supervisor) about

  • not only daddy but also daddy’s friends who were sexually abusing them (such disclosures first made on 30.6.13 by B and on 21.7.13 by I);
  • being treated for thrush (February or early March 2014);

 

  • one of the twins (I) being treated for rectal bleeding (March 2014); and

 

  • the other (B) having mouth ulcers (March 2014)

 

[it should be possible for Child Safety to check medical records].

These disclosures did not happen every Sunday but, to my knowledge, roughly every 2 or 3 weeks for some months. On these occasions Cassie would turn up after contact either at my house, or at her parents’ house, or at Madge Sceriha’s house literally shaking with distress to the extent of being unable to drive her car, and beside herself about what on earth she could do to help her daughters. Indeed on one occasion one twin had quietly said to her “mummy, help me please”.

The fact that the disclosures re Daddy and Daddy’s friends were not heard by the Contact Centre supervisor is definitely feasible given the observations, made by Cassie’s mother, Heather Doubleday, when she attended contact with Cassie, that the supervisor(s) were often not well positioned to hear absolutely all that the twins said to their mother. I understand, however, that a Contact Centre supervisor did hear about the thrush on one occasion in March 2014 as the girls spoke loudly and at length about their distaste for the gunk that was coming out of their vaginas. I do not know whether the Contact Centre lodged a report to Child Safety re this discussion about the symptoms of thrush. In my view, had such a report been submitted then it would be entirely remiss of Child Safety not to investigate – a situation reminiscent of the events which led to the establishment in 2003 of the CMC inquiry into abuse of children in foster care, reported in 2004. Is history repeating itself here?

With the benefit of hindsight, I can see that Cassie’s increasing insufferable distress on hearing these new disclosures (re Daddy’s friends, re the thrush and the rectal bleeding) and her mounting concern about the thinness of the twins (signalling neglect in Cassie’s mind), must have led her to her make a decision to abduct her daughters and flee into hiding. She did not mention, let alone discuss, this with me.

Cassie had known for over a year that I did not think abduction of her girls would be a good idea as the consequences, if/when they were found, would be imprisonment and loss of future contact with her daughters. Furthermore, Cassie knew that the Family Inclusion Network, of which I am the Townsville president, could not support any illegal activity on her part. Thus it was a total unanticipated shock to me to learn that Cassie had abducted the twins on Friday 4th April 2014.

Again with the benefit of hindsight, I can understand that, through the failure of formal child protection services including the police, Cassie must have thought there was simply no other option available to her to ensure protection from CSA for her twin daughters.

 

Conclusion to the argument developed in this document

 

From my contact as a FIN professional social work support volunteer with Cassie Watter over more than 2 years, together with the knowledge of professional colleagues from their own involvement with Cassie, I am of the firm conviction that there is more than sufficient evidence to support a decision that the twins should not be returned to their father’s care if/when they are found.

In many other cases, where there is only one disclosure of CSA compared with the multitude reported in this case, Child Safety has taken protective action. Why not in this case?

Is it because it is a “Family Court” case? If this is so, then the research evidence re disclosures of CSA in Family Court cases should be given due weight – that is, the rate of false disclosures is no different in Family Court cases than in all other cases in the community ie between 5-9% (Brown et al 1998; 2007)

If Child Safety holds the view that Cassie Watter has coached the twins then solid evidence of coaching needs to be identified rather than mere supposition based on the mischievous claims of the father and spurious references to “whispering” by the Barrister for the ICL. Over two years of contact with Cassie, I gained no impression whatsoever that she was coaching her daughters, even when I quizzed her closely on a number of occasions in order to check this out. This perception is borne out by the numerous reports made by contact supervisors who witnessed zero evidence of coaching. While contact supervisors observed the twins sometimes whispering to Cassie, they did not see Cassie whispering to the girls.

Further to the matter of Cassie Watter’s credibility, in my experience over two years of being her FIN support social worker, I found her to be a thoroughly honest person with considerable integrity. The issue of “perjury” in the Family Court was essentially an isolated example, motivated by Cassie’s wish to protect her parents from learning unpalatable information about their son, and not at all an indication of habitual deceit.

Furthermore, all of the several psychologists and psychiatrists who have assessed Cassie’s mental health have found no evidence of psychopathology. By contrast, the father’s mental health has never been fully assessed, even though he grew up in the care of a mother who lived with schizophrenia, he himself experienced CSA, and there is a significant history of his perpetration of domestic violence, evident in a Protection Order granted in October 2011.

In my view (and that of other concerned professionals) the safety and well-being of the Watter twin daughters, when found, is dependent on Child Safety Services undertaking a new and full investigation, uncontaminated by the inadequacies of previous assessments and, for the first time, interviewing all witnesses to disclosures made by the girls.

As Munro argues in her seminal paper Common Errors of Reasoning in Child Protection Work “professional judgements should be regarded as valuable but fallible, needing to be treated as hypotheses requiring further testing. This is not an easy step … (but) changing your mind should be seen as a sign of good practice and of strength not weakness” (Munro 1999 pp755-756).

 

References

Bateson, G., Jackson, D.D., Haley,   J. & Weakland,   J. (1956), Towards a Theory of Schizophrenia

Behavioral Science, Vol 1, pp251–264

Brown, T.C., Hewitt, L., Sheehan, R., Frederico, M. (1998) Child Abuse & the Family Court, Australian Institute of Criminology, Trends and Issues Series, No 91, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra ACT Australia, pp1-6.

Brown, T.C. and Alexander, R. (2007) Child Abuse and Family Law: Understanding the issues facing human service and legal professionals. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin

Crime and Misconduct Commission (2004) Protecting Children: An Inquiry into the Abuse of Children in Foster Care. Brisbane CMC

Foote, W.L.(2006) Child Sexual Abuse Allegations in the Family Court. PhD thesis: University of Sydney.

Foote, W.L. (2010) ‘Responses to Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse in Family Court Hearings’, Women in Welfare Education, No. 9, pp. 63 – 78

Munro E. (1999) Common Errors of Reasoning in Child Protection Work. Child Abuse and Neglect Vol 23 No. 8 pp745-758

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

145 total views, no views today

This father is worse than an animal !! #Leak53 #WikiDetectives

Free Missing Watter Twins #Leak53

In fact , to align Michael Watter with an animal does a disservice to the animal ! You are disgusting ! WE have said before — we HAVE this photograph which will be given to the authorities when there is a PUBLIC RE INVESTIGATION !!!

THIS PHOTOGRAPH IS CONFRONTING

The photograph was taken on 24th January 2012 when one of the twins, after a shower jumped up on the lounge of the maternal grand-parents with the father, Mr Michael Watter, present. The child was without underwear and it was obvious to both grandparents that the child was red raw in her genitalia area.

The father, who had been given sole parental custody on 9th December 2011, was asked to take the child to the doctor, with her mother, but he refused as he said that there was nothing wrong with her but he became very edgy and could not sit still. He sat for a few seconds then stood and walked around, doing this quite a few times before saying to both girls that it was time to go.

Before he left, though, the grandmother mentioned to the other twin granddaughter how sore her sister’s ‘toushka’ looked, to which she replied, ‘That’s what happens when daddy rubs us too hard with his penis.’

Mrs Watter felt as though they could not report this matter as she had been threatened by CPIU with arrest if any further complaints of abuse were reported.

When Mr Watter found out about the photo, he threatened to have us charged with child pornography. The photo was only taken for medical evidence as Mr Watter had refused to take the child to the doctor. The photo clearly shows the severly damaged, to the point of bleeding, genitalia area

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

114 total views, no views today

Imagine playing with your child’s “toushka” while she is urinating! #Leak52 #WikiDetectives

 

Free Missing Watter Twins #Leak52

Imagine a child being too scared to go to the toilet because her father would start “ playing with her private parts  “ whilst she was trying to urinate ! She would rather wet her pants instead . How degrading for the little child ! Michael Watter , you are a perverted , disgusting , piece of excrement . Your poor , poor children ! The sexual abuse these little girls have suffered is heart breaking ! There will need to be years , if not a lifetime of counselling when they eventually are able to come out of hiding ! The authorities , in particular the police and child services need to be ashamed of themselves !  A PUBLIC RE INVESTIGATION is urgently needed !
23rd Oct 2011. Phoned the girls this morning and they were waiting for their father to arrive for an access visit. They wouldn’t talk. Made me think that they were obviously nervous as they are normally very chatty when ever we phone.

2nd Nov 2011. approx 7:30pm. Cassie and the girls arrived home after Michael had access. The girls were both in very pretty nighties which were nylon and completely unsuitable for sleeping in, through Townsville’s warm nights. These nighties were on the girls when Michael dropped off the girls to the Hermit Park State school where a Prep. Orientation night was being held. Cassie changed the girls into cotton nighties. Isabella complained about being sore in her ‘toushka’ and when Cassie looked, she had quite a severe rash. When asked what had happened Isabella said that she had wet her pants as she didn’t want to go to the toilet at Dad’s as he would start ‘playing with her private parts’ while she sits there.

3rd Nov 2011 7.55am. Isabella said that she didn’t want to go to school today as she is scared that her Dad will be picking her up after school (as he had the day before) and she wanted Cassie to stay with her if she had to go to school. Cassie took her and stayed for awhile as Isabella was crying and Cassie waited for her to settle.

10:44 am. Arrived at solicitors just as Cassie received a call from the school that Isabella had cried again after Cassie left for work, but had settled and was very quiet and clinging to her teacher Miss Cawood.

4th Nov 2011. Met Cassie at work by 11.00am to pick up girls from school and then into see Caroline Seri. Returned home for lunch then girls went off to work with Cass. Michael to pick up girls for overnight access from there at 4.30pm. Cass phoned and Isabella still not in Michael’s car by 5.20pm.) Isabella had left a message on our phone pleading with Poppy to come and get her and bring her back to our place. Just so heart-wrenching!!) Michael phoned at 5:46pm asking us to take Isabella’s toy dog out to the car which Arth did at 5: 48pm. Both girls were very subdued.

5th Nov 2011. Girls arrive back from their overnight access visit just after 5.00pm and they both look extremely tired and so quiet and when Poppy went out to have a chat with them Isabella ran around the side of the house and hid and they would not talk to me. We had all spent a sleepless night worrying about these precious little girls and wonder all the time why they have to be made continually scared and upset.

That night, at about 10.30pm, Bronte was crying and so distressed with pain which she said was in her ‘touska’ and also in her bowel. She could not be comforted or cradled. She has had these ‘attacks’ quite often over the past few months and upon investigation with doctors and ultra-sounds, nothing seems to be found. Why??! What is causing these attacks as she is just so distressed that they could not be just ‘make believe’ surely?? These ‘sessions’ are just so upsetting for all in the house as Bronte cries out in such pain and is obviously feeling ‘real’ pain.

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

91 total views, no views today

This so called father admits to mental health problems ! #Leak51 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 51

The little man at his finest again !

 

Michael’s Admissions of Depression

 

Upon returning from Mick & Cassies’ Wedding in Fiji, they were married on 22nd March 2000, I received a letter from Mick’s grandmother. (Copy attached).

Mick’s mother phoned me, weekly for a few months, begging me to be patient with him and help him with his behavioral problems. She was extremely upset that Mick would not contact her and asked that I encourage him to keep regular contact with her. She also asked, at each phone call, that Heather & I assist him and support him with his temper and behavioral problems. I gave her my word that we would be as helpful to him as we could possibly be.

We have kept that promise to his mother right up until Mick stopped all contact with us and Cassie’s side of the family on 24th Jan 2012. (Refer diary entry dated 24th January 2012.)

Sadly, over the years, we have watched Mick’s behavior deteriorate to the stage where it became very worrying.

Mick took the girls, Bronte & Isabella, to Brisbane for a few days in early January of this year and did not visit either his mother or father with the girls. This would have been devastating for his mother.

20th November 2011. Whilst at ‘Lolly-Pops’ at Domain Central, Mick became very strange. He started to tremble, became very pale and was crying. I did not discuss the problem with him. Within 40 minutes, he appeared to have taken control of himself again although he remained very subdued.

4th January 2012.        It was the girls 5th Birthday party with approximately forty children and adults attending. Mick did not get involved in conversation with guests or take part in any of the proceedings of the party whatsoever. He went inside after the bar-b-cue was cooked and appeared pale, trembling, was crying and very distant in manner. When asked what the matter was, he replied that he was suffering from severe depression and had done for years. He would not eat. After about 20 minutes, Mick seemed to settle and enjoyed some of the bar-b-cue food but still did not mix with the guests or any of the girls’ friends but returned inside and stayed there until it was time to leave.

8th January 2012.        Access visit by Mick with the girls. He stayed very quiet, strange and distant. He accepted a soft-drink but I could not connect with him at all.

10th January 2012.      During another access visit, Mick again revealed that he suffers from depression for years. I offered my sympathy and told Mick that I was available to talk with him if at anytime he wanted to talk about his problem. He said, ‘Thank you! That would be good.’

17th January 2012.      Again Mick was very distant and moody but accepted a glass of wine and dinner but left with a blank look on his face without saying ‘Thank you’ or ‘Goodbye.’

22nd January 2012.     Mick very jubilant and bragging about how good it was to be ‘single’ again and how much he was enjoying life, at present. This behavior seemed to be in contradiction to how he usually behaved as we have never seen him on such a ‘high’ with his emotions. The twins barely spoke during the visit and were overly subdued.

24th January 2012.      Mick visited and was very happy until Isabella, who had a shower after swimming and had dressed but had no undies on, jumped up onto the lounge where Heather, Mick & I were sitting, revealing a very red, raw genital area. I immediately told Mick that he & Cassie needed to take her to the doctor which he refused to do saying that, ‘She doesn’t need go to any doctor.’ His attitude changed in an instant and he became very aggressive, irritated and edgy, as he could not sit still and kept getting up, walking a few paces then sitting again. He left in a rush without making sure that he girls were strapped into their car-seats. He had become very aggressive and quite frightening.

28th January 2012.      Mick turned up at our place with cold beer, the Court Order and Reasoning.. He seemed very happy but trying to coach me into critising Federal Magistrate Coker which I refused to do. Mick flew into a rage screaming that we would never see the girls again.

3rd October 2012.       Was standing at the front gate with Mr. Manser when Michael drove past with the girls, on the way to school. Mick gave us the ‘Middle Finger Salute’ in front of the girls and increased speed.

This is a true and honest account of happenings to the best of my knowledge.

Yours faithfully

 

Arthur Ernest Doubleday

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

94 total views, no views today

How selfish can a person actually get ? VERY , it appears ! #Leak50 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 50

 

We thought LEAK 50 should be special so we hereby present a statement reflecting how so very wrong we have been about this kind , loving specimen of a man !

 

We are so very sorry Michael Watter ! We misjudged you — you are far worse than we thought ! In fact we cannot find the words to describe the type of person that you are ! Certainly not words that can be printed on this page little man !

 

 

 

MICHAEL JAMES WATTER

Date of Birth 19th February 1976

Married Catherine Lee Doubleday on 22nd March 2000.

 

As we were all checking in our luggage at the Brisbane Airport to travel to Fiji for Cassie & Michaels’ wedding, an official came across and asked the attendant if a Michael Watter had been processed to which the attendant said, ‘I have just put his luggage through.’ Cassie & Michael were still standing there. The official then said to Michael that he had just had a phone call to say that his mother was gravely ill and that he needed to make contact immediately. Michael went off with the official and Michael’s luggage then had to be found and brought back out. All the rest of the wedding party then sat and waited for Michael’s return which wasn’t too long and he was quite angry as he had phoned his mother’s home only for her to answer seemingly alright. When Michael asked her what was the matter as he had been asked to phone so urgently, her reply was that she just wanted to say, ‘ that she just wanted to have a chat with him and to say goodbye!’ His luggage was then reloaded and we eventually headed off to Fiji.

On arrival, it was soon learned that no arrangements had been made for music, flowers drinks or food for the wedding. Heather & I organized a choir, drinks, food, flowers and staff to attend and serve guests at the wedding. This cost us several hundreds of dollars to which Cassie was so grateful and thanked us over & over but not a word of acknowledgement or thanks from Michael. We had also upgraded their accommodation for which Cassie thanked but again no thanks from Michael.

On our return from Fiji, an evening was organized for family members and friends who were unable to make it over to Fiji for the actual wedding. Within an hour of Michael’s mother’s arrival (she had arrived very late, at least an hour after everybody else had arrived) at the party at Southbank at Kangaroo Point in Brisbane, there was a large family dispute, involving Mick’s family. We left as soon as possible after this event. (Attached is a letter from Mick’s maternal grandmother.)

Several properties were purchased by Cassie & Mick during the first 6 or seven years of their marriage. These properties were then renovated and sold at a profit.

No. 1.   Macgregor in ACT.   Heather & I drove from Townsville to Canberra in our caravan and stayed for 8 days. While there, we took Cassie to Bunnings and purchased most items required for the renovation. We very rarely saw Michael during our visit. We took them out for dinner one night and Michael never acknowledged our contribution to the renovation or thanked us for dinner.

No. 2.   Haig Street, Gordon Park, Brisbane.   While on a visit to Brisbane we re-plumbed the whole house from the water-main to all points. Mick’s father is a plumber but did not contribute at all. WE purchased all equipment and items required to do the job.

No. 3.   Surrey Street, Nundah Qld. No involvement at all.

No. 4.   Barkley Street, Deagon, Qld.   Attended the auction with Cassie and paid deposit which was returned on settlement then stayed 7 days to help Cassie tidy back-yard gardens.. Purchased items required for repairs to the home. Never saw Mick in the whole time we were there.

No. 5.   Chapman Street, Mysterton, Townsville.   We assisted with costs and repairs. Mick in Brisbane and only visited for one week and never saw him.

No. 6.   Greenway Street, Grange, Bne. Visited for 5 days and helped with repairs and fenced backyard. Purchased some items required. Mick never helped or acknowledged our efforts and financial contributions while there.

No. 7.   Oldenberg Place, Kelso. Townsville.   Constructed fencing and assisted with repairs. Spent 3 or 4 week-ends helping construct lawn- locker. Walked ride-on mower from our home in Rasmussen to Kelso a distance of approx. 4klms several times to mow the acreage block several times. The only comment from Mick was, ‘How did you get the mower here?’ I explained that I had driven it around and he just laughed and walked away. Cassie phoned when the drains blocked. I then went around and cleared drains, purchased new sump pump, installed it at considerable cost to ourselves. Mick never acknowledged our efforts, time and energy or the costs which we paid out on their behalf. Cassie was always so appreciative and thankful.

When the girls were old enough to sit at the table, for quite some time, I would ride my bike around to have breakfast with them. The girls really enjoyed my visits. However Mick could not accept my presence and made it very clear that I was not welcome, so I ceased going around. This then upset Cassie and the girls so I would ride around and if Mick’s car was still there, I would not go in. I only went in for visits if I knew that he was not there.

When Michael’s car needed to be serviced he would always request one of our cars for use to which we always obliged and never refused him.

Mick has always been treated as part of our family, ie; he would walk into our home without knocking and just help himself to a beer or wine, settle himself in the lounge and select the TV program of his choice. This behavior continued up until the time that he refused us access to the children on 24th January. 2012.

On the 28th January he came to our home with the Court Order and Reasoning to badger me with questions regarding these documents which, I believe, he was trying to succeed in getting me to dispute Magistrate Coker’s decision.

Michael has not been to our home since.

It is estimated that the cost to ourselves is in the vicinity of at least $20.000 assisting Mick & Cassie become established. Mick has never once acknowledged our financial assistance or our generosity in time and labour in any way whatsoever.

Attached is a copy of a letter from Michael’s grandmother dated 20th March 2000. It says it all.

Terry, any of the above comments which you consider relevant can be expanded upon fully.

Yours faithfully

 

 

Arthur E Doubleday.

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

 

123 total views, no views today

Sexual abuse disclosed to 10 people — only 1 interviewed by the police !! #Leak49 #WikiDetectives

 

LEAK 49

 

Look at how many people the children disclosed the sexual abuse to !

Ask the police and child services how many of those same people were ever questioned ?

Looks like a professional and thorough investigation by the police ?  NOT !!

A PUBLIC RE INVESTIGATION is needed !

 

 

List of Supervisors

 

 

  1. Rae Greaves. Founder of a Women’s shelter here in Townsville.
  2. Norm Land. Distinguished Rotarian.Norm also worked on Pilot boats for Townsville Port Authority until August 2013.
  3. Robert (Bob) Bartlett. Rotarian. Retired Council Executive.
  4. Lynette Bartlett.
  5. Rhonda Lane.
  6. Hollie Mallardi.  Student Social Services.
  7. Professor Virginia Hall OAM. (Gini). Social Science.
  8. Maureen Land.
  9. Mathew Morrison.Retired school teacher and Friend of Rotary
  10. Wendy Williams
  11. Wendy Willcox.
  12. Alex Dronysius.
  13. Karin Carmichael. Rotarian.

 

 

People to whom the girls have made sexual disclosures .

 

 

  1. Heather Doubleday. Maternal Grandmother.
  2. Arthur Doubleday. Maternal Grandfather.
  3. Christine Young. Retired nurse. .
  4. Reece Willcox.
  5. Patricia Plaistead. Retired Hospital Admistrator.
  6. Ridley Plaistead.   Retired legal Rep for W. A Court. Perth.
  7. Desiree Taylor.
  8. Carolyn Seri. Child Psychologist . Peak Performance Psychology.
  9. Dr Rebecca McGowan.   Townsville & Suburban Medical Practice.
  10. Lucy Dall-Alba. Occupational Therapist.

 

The supervisors’ reports were sent to the Independent Childrens Lawyer, Ms Joanne Meade who then sent on the reports to the mother’s lawyer and the father’s lawyer. If the girls had revealed anything of a sexual nature against the father, he would then severely punish the children. They often told us about how angry he became when he found out.

A person of great support to Cassie and also ourselves, is Emeritus Professor Rosamund Thorpe, president of Family Inclusion Network Inc.    Another support person for us and who has been involved throughout the entire time, is Mr Neville Abbey, who has just recently handed over the reins of presidency of the Nth. Qld. Grandparents in Need of Support Council Inc.

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

 

137 total views, no views today

Letter to Inspector C Scanlon — no reply — what is he hiding ? #Leak48 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 48

Nothing done about this ! Why ?

RE INVESTIGATE please !

 

Inspector C Scanlon

Northern Regional Crime Coordinator

 

3rd November 2014

 

Subject:-  Watter children.

 

Dear Inspector,

 

It is now over 7 1/2mths since our grandchildren, Bronte & Isabella  Watter, along with their Mother, our daughter, Cassie Watter vanished on 4th April 2014.

There has been a significant amount of evidence surface during that period, of which we were not aware ie:

  1. Supervisors reports. These supervisors were approved by the Family Court, the father, Michael Watter and the Independent Childrens Lawyer, Ms Joanne Meade. The supervisors are all reputable people from all professions and walks of life. These same supervisors, I believe, have never been interviewed by police with signed statements taken.
  2. There are other witnesses other than the approved supervisors who have never been interviewed by police with signed statements taken.
  3. Heather and I have never been questioned with regard to the physical, psychological, or sexual abuse, perpetrated by the father against the girls, or had signed statements taken by police despite our many efforts to do so.
  4. Strong evidence that the father, Michael Watter, has repeatedly coached the children. Refer to our diaries and the supervisors’ reports.
  5. Evidence, in our diaries, of physical, verbal and sexual abuse by Mr Watter against Cassie Watter. A DVO was in place when he was given the children.

It has been reported to us that an Inquiry by Police into the case is in progress. Can we be assured that all evidence will be reviewed, by those conducting this inquiry?

 

Yours faithfully

 

Heather & Arthur Doubleday

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

93 total views, no views today

Pass the parcel in an Irish pub ! Fastest game in the world unless you are trying to report child sexual abuse ! #Leak46 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 46

Nothing has been done about this ! Why ?

Publicly RE INVESTIGATE this please !

ATTEMPTS BY HEATHER & ARTHUR DOUBLEDAY TO REPORT CHILD ABUSE

Allegations of sexual & psychological abuse made by Isabella & Bronte Watter against their father Michael James Watter

 

20th January 2012                   Contacted the Sexual Abuse Hotline in Brisbane and was referred to Relationships Australia in Townsville.

8th March 2012                       Contacted Federal Member for Herbert, Mr Ewen Jones.

12th March 2012                     Mr Jones’ office advised us to phone Mr Steven Cannon, Senior Intake Officer at Child Safety.

15th March 2012                     Phoned Mr Cannon for an appointment on 47997900. Mr Cannon was to phone back with an appointment date. We still have had no contact with Mr Cannon.

1st October 2012                     Contacted the Commissioner for Children and by Monday 8th October 2012, we still have had no reply.

4th October 2012                    Went into the see the Child Protection & Investigation Unit, Townsville City with a statement of abuse that was made by the girls in front of five adults. Never spoke to anyone from the CPIU. Were told that they would ‘get back to us.’ No one ever contacted. Others also contacted police in regard to the abuse but were never interviewed by police.

15th October 2012                  Again into the City Police Station with a statement and again the same response as above.

19th October 2012                  To Kirwan Police Station with a statement re girls’ allegations of abuse and of being left in car with windows wound up and in full sunshine. Told that statement would be sent to CPIU. Again we never heard from them.

7th November 2012                Another incident of girls in car in full sunshine, windows up and car locked, so reported to Kirwan Police Station with a signed statement. Received a phone call from police to say that ‘It is alright to leave children in a car for a reasonable amount of time’!

17th January 2013                   Telephone call to Snr Det Sgt David Miles who refused to take a statement or speak to us in regard to the sexual abuse allegations. Transcript of phone call available.

3rd March 2013                       Had an interview with a Ms Gaynor at Child Safety who refused to take statements of allegations of sexual abuse made by the girls against their father saying that it was a matter for the CPIU but we had been there and they also had refused to take statements. We had asked for the interviewer’s name three times and each time she stated Ms Gaynor. We later found out that her name was Ms Gaynor WILLIAMS. Transcript for this interview is also available.

 

We have never, to this day, been interviewed by the police in relation to the sexual abuse, that the children, Bronte and Isabella, have revealed to us and also the family violence, which has been on-going for many years. Mr Watter had a DVO out against him to protect Cassie and Isabella when he was given sole custody of the children. (Photos attached)

Heather & Arthur Doubleday

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

113 total views, no views today

What are the police hiding Inspector Craig Weatherly ? #Leak45 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 45

The evident corruption and ineptitude between the police and other government departments grows bigger and bigger !

Why do you think none of the questions in the letter below by the grandfather have been answered ?

Why do you think the police have not questioned  the people the children disclosed their sexual abuse to ?

We are not policemen but we know if we were investigating this case that we certainly would have interviewed every single person the children had disclosed their rape and abuse to ! Wouldn’t you ? Seriously !

Whenever anyone has spoken up they have either been ignored , told to go away and/or disbelieved , irrespective of the evidence ! We refer you back to our very first LEAK 1 and Professor Freda Brigg’s comments and need to ask WHY none of this has been looked at correctly by the authorities ? WE are talking reputable , qualified individuals with no axe to grind !

Why would the Child Safety Officer refuse to give her full name when the sexual and psychological abuse was reported by the grandparents ? Like the grandfather says – he has a transcript of the interview , as we do !

Why would Det. Sen. Sgt. David Miles refuse to take evidence ? He is a policeman is he not or is he just a servant of certain members of the community ?

Police Officer Rob Garnett refused to take evidence from the people the sexual abuse was disclosed to ! Why would that be Mr. Policeman ?

What makes Detective Snr Sgt David Miles, Officer Michelle Faint and a Department of Child Safety Officer judge and jury in this case ?

Evidence has emerged that alleges the Independent Children’s Lawyer, Ms Joanne Meade of Legal Aid, Townsville, attempted to interfere with evidence to be presented to the Family Court and yet nothing is done about this either ! Why ?

Why are answers still being awaited from Inspector Craig Weatherley ? Is it because Professor Freda Briggs has passed away and therefore cannot follow up on her questions ? Very convenient for Inspector Craig Weatherly isn’t it !

The previous LNP Government’s Minister for Child Safety, Hon Tracey Davies, refused to meet with child protection specialists, Ms Hetty Johnston and Emeritus Professor Dr Freda Briggs AO in relation to the case. Why? Yes —- why ?

So many questions and absolutely NO answers !!

There is no question here that a PUBLIC RE INVESTIGATION is needed !

Hon Jo-Ann Miller

Minister for Police & Emergency Services

And Minister for Corrective Services

P.O. Box 122

Goodna Q;d   4300

27th April 2015

Dear Madam,

We met with you at the recent Queensland State Government Minister’s Meeting, held in Townsville on 29th February 2015. We were accompanied by several Social Welfare, Child Protection and Family Violence Service Centre workers with more than 130yrs combined experience in their various fields.

We were all disappointed with our inability to present evidence in the Watter v Watter case.

The Police Commissioner, Ian Stewart, held his line repeatedly by stating that Mrs Cassie Watter needed to be brave and present herself with her children, Isabella and Bronte, for questioning.

Indeed, she was brave enough to come forward and report the abuse that the children reported to her. The children were also brave enough to disclose to the Child Protection Investigation Unit, in minute detail, the abuse which their father, Mr Michael James Watter had inflicted upon them.

Detective Snr Srg David Miles, Officer Michelle Faint and a Department of Child Safety Officer told the mother that they did not believe her or the children.

The children have disclosed abuse to many reputable people, who have never been spoken to by Police or Child Safety, including ourselves.

Police Officer Rob Garnett also refused to take evidence of abuse that the children had disclosed to witnesses.

We reported to Department of Child Safety officer, Ms Gaynor Williams, on 3rd March 2013 the allegations of sexual and psychological abuse of which the children had reported to us. Ms Williams refused to take the abuse saying that it was a police matter. Ms Williams refused to give her full and proper name at the interview. A transcript of the interview is available.

On 17th January 2013, we telephoned Det Snr Srg David Miles, who refused to take the evidence from us that the children had disclosed to us. A transcript of the conversation is available.

Both these attempts to report abuse were prior to a Court Case.

Evidence has emerged that alleges the Independent Childrens Lawyer, Ms Joanne Meade of Legal Aid, Townsville, attempted to interfere with evidence to be presented to the Family Court.

We were stunned when told, by police, of Cassie and the girl’s disappearance and could not understand why she would place herself under the threat of imprisonment. However with the mountain of evidence, which has emerged since 4th April 2014, it would appear that, in order to protect the children, she had no other option.

We do not support her actions and have no idea of her whereabouts.

The comments from the Commissioner that we or Cassie’s siblings should contact her and encourage her to return were very hurtful, particularly to my wife, as it implied that we knew where Cassie is, which we don’t. We both have slept little since their disappearance and are constantly trying to work out where they might be and if okay or even if alive. We grieve every day for the loss of our daughter and precious grandchildren.

We have full respect and confidence in the Commissioner and to put it in layman’s terms, we believe to be an honest cop’, but, maybe, not fully briefed on the case.

We believe that Cassie could be encouraged to return, with the children, given the right environment.

I mentioned the encouragement of Cassie to return, to the A/Regional Crime Coordinator, Northern Region, Inspector, Cheryl Scanlon, who referred us to Child Safety. On contacting Child Safety, they would not even acknowledge that we had even asked the question.

Mrs Cassie Watter with her daughters Bronte and Isabella would need to be brave, very brave indeed, to return to the disbelief, bullying, threats and mistreatment of Officials in C.P.I.U. and D.O.C.S. in Townsville. All trained Child Protection Personnel should know that five year old children would be unable to ‘dream’ the sexual abuse which these girls, Isabella and Bronte, had described so explicitly to Officers at C.P.I.U. with a Child Safety Officer present, unless they had experienced it.

The Queensland Police Service’s insistence that no further investigations can commence until all three are located, is concerning as all three were available for almost 2 ½ years prior to their disappearance and yet, Det Snr Srg David Miles refused to investigate, during that time, disclosures of sexual abuse which the girls had revealed to so many reputable witnesses.

We know of another family, in Townville, who have had a similar experience with Child Protection Investigation Unit and Child Safety, in the fact that Det Snr Srg David Miles does not believe the mother or her children about sexual abuse, perpetrated against the children by their father. Astonishingly, Det Snr Srg David Miles still heads the C.P.I.U. in Townsville.

Nigh on 18months ago a serious complaint was lodged with the, then, Crime & Misconduct Commission, now the Crime & Corruption Commission in relation to Det Snr Srg David Miles and others. This complaint was handed to Inspector Craig Weatherley to investigate. Has the investigation been completed? If so, are you able to advise us of the outcome?

Justice Tree of the Federal Family Court, warned all parties, including the press that Section 121 of the Family Law Act would be enforced. Section 121 relates to the information, relative to a specific case being not made public. We have observed this ruling by only going public when asked by the police to request Cassie and the Children to return. Mr Watter has ignored Section 121 by placing the Watter v Watter Court Rulings on Facebook. Mr Watter has accused us of being involved in the abduction and harbouring of Cassie and the children and has also run a strong campaign against his wife by accusing her of having mental problems and abusing the children, gaining him huge public support.

The previous LNP Government’s Minister for Child Safety, Hon Tracey Davies, refused to meet with child protection specialists, Ms Hetty Johnston and Emeritus Professor Dr Freda Briggs AO in relation to the case. Why? Is your Government prepared to meet with these expert people who have an intimate knowledge of the Watter v Watter case.

Your Government was swept to power on the promise of integrity and accountability. These principals have not been applied to this case.

Please do something to have these children’s cries for help, heard and believed.

 

Yours faithfully

Heather & Arthur Doubleday

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

255 total views, no views today

Such a clever deceptive man our father is ! #Leak43 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 43

 

SUPREME/DISTRICT/MAGISTRATESCOURT OF QUEENSLAND

 

REGISTRY:
NUMBER:

 

 

Plaintiff[i]: Arthur Doubleday
AND
[First] Defendant[ii]: Michael Watter

 

AFFIDAVIT

 

Darrel Stanley Doubleday of 32 Reisling Road, Bonnells Bay, New South Wales states on oath:

 

  1. I am the brother of the Plantiff, Arthur Doubleday.

 

  1. On Saturday the 10th of May, 2014, I was at my brother’s house, Arthur Doubleday at 1155 Riverway Drive, Rasmussen, Queensland. It was about lunchtime and I recall that the phone rang a number of times in a short time frame. I recall that Arthur did not answer the phone for the first couple of times, then Arthur finally answered it. After Arthur hung up the phone he said to me words to the effect of “That was the florist and he said someone is sending Heather flowers for mother’s day and would someone be home tomorrow. I remember we all discussed the nature of the call and thought it was a bit strange.

 

  1. I remember the following day (mother’s day) we were sitting out the front on the verandah when a grey coloured 4WD wagon stopped across the road from Arthur’s house. It stayed there for a while and Arthur got up and walked towards the front gate. I remember that the wagon then drove off and appeared to be in a hurry. I remember around the same time I recall a red Alfa Romeo drive past Arthur’s on the opposite side of the road and then drove past again a very short time later driving the other way. I remember when Arthur came back he mentioned that the Alfa Romeo was Michael Watter’s car.
  2. Two hours later or thereabouts we were still out the front on the verandah and I recall seeing the same grey wagon stop at the driveway. Arthur got up and started to walk to the front gate and the car sped off.
  3. Sworn [or: Affirmed] by Darrel Doubleday on                                            at                                    in the presence of:Signed:Deponent[who certifies that the affidavit was read in the presence of the deponent who seemed to understand it, and signified that that person made the affidavit. (If required: see R. 433(1)].  

    [who certifies that the affidavit was read in the presence of the deponent who seemed to understand it, and signified that that person made the affidavit, but was physically incapable of signing it. (If required: see R.433(2)].

     

[i] For proceedings commenced by Originating Application for “Plaintiff” substitute “Applicant”

 

[ii] For proceedings commenced by Originating Application for “Defendant” substitute “Respondent”

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

 

105 total views, no views today

WHY would Judge John Coker give custody to the abusive father when an AVO has been issued against the father ? #Leak42 #WikiDetectives

 

LEAK 42

 

 

Michael Watter’s abuse towards the grandparents  Heather & Arthur Doubleday..

On December 9th 2011 Mr Watter was awarded sole custody of Bronte and Isabella Watter the twin daughters of his and Catherine (Cassie) Lee Watter. Contained in the Order handed down by Judge John Coker was the fact that Mr Watter  was to encourage a meaningful relationship between the twins and ourselves as grandparents. This was never forthcoming and the breach had continued to the day that, we presume, Cassie abducted the girls and went into hiding with them.

All access with the girls was under strict supervision, which was not ordered by the Court. This supervision was, firstly, under supervision with Mr Watter himself then under supervision with the Court approved supervisors, for Cassie, when she had access with the girls. We only saw the girls when Cassie was able to come to our place or we went over to hers while Cassie’s supervised access was in progress.

We had e-mailed Mr Watter on quite a few occasions (e-mails attached), requesting time with the girls only to either be refused or ignored. We had made requests to attend functions at the girls’ school which were refused and when we spoke with Mr Clayton Carnes, the Hermit Park State School Principal, we were told that, due to the fact that Mr Watter had ordered that we not be at the school, Mr Carnes would be obliged to call police to evict us.

The original supervision by Mr Watter himself ceased on 24th January 2012 when we noted one girl with a very near red-raw genitalia and when mentioned to the other twin she stated, ‘That’s what happens when Daddy rubs us too hard with his penis.’ and on 28th January Mr Watter came to our home to speak with Arthur during which he stated that ‘Cassie would NEVER have those children again!’ and that his supervision was to cease immediately to ‘protect himself’.

Access ceased, completely, for a couple of months until the Court ordered, ICL and Mr Watter approved supervisors were appointed which was when we were able to make contact with the girls again but only under supervision. This supervision, for us, was never an order from the Court but a dictate from Mr Watter in order ‘to protect himself’.

The Court approved supervisors’ access ceased on 11th October2012 and Cassie then only had access at Relationships Australia at Nth Ward for 1 ½ hrs one Saturday afternoon and then 1 ¾ hrs the alternate Saturday. This changed to 2 hrs each Sunday when Raltionships Australia opened their new premises at Condon in latter half of 2013.

From 11th October 2012 to 4th April 2014 when Cassie presumably went into hiding with the girls we had only seen the girls with Cassie and which Cassie arranged, at supervised access to celebrate Christmas on 24th Dec 2012, the girls B’day 2013, 26th Jan 2013 as Cassie had been stranded in Bundaberg during the floods so we took her place for access, 31st August 3013 to celebrate our 50th Wedding anniversary with the girls, Sun 22 Dec, for Christmas and again 4th Jan for girls Birthday.

On 28th February 2014, we took Michael to Court regarding the breach and he was ordered by Justice Tree to see that he kept the Order to give us a meaningful relationship as per a new Order of June 2013. We then saw the girls but again under Mr Watter’s strict supervision,( which was not an Order of the Court) on 3rd March, 16th Feb, 26th Feb for half-an-hour at the school for the girls’ cross-country race. (Mr Watter met us at the school gate, walked in with us and stayed by our side all the while and then walked us out again) and then again on 3rd April.

Mr Watter has claimed that we have a mental problem and should seek medical assistance for this. As per attached e-mail.

4th April 1014. We phoned Mr Watter after the police had been to our place to inform us of the presumed abduction only to be threatened and abused. Call disconnected. He phoned back to repeat the threats and abuse so disconnected again.  Reported to police at Kirwan.

10th May 2014.  Received 2 blocked calls which we didn’t answer. Phoned again and when answered man said that it was the florist (not naming which florist) and that they had a special delivery for Mrs Doubleday the following day and when would we be home. Arth said that we would be home in the morning, going out for lunch and then out all afternoon. ‘So! You will be out all afternoon?’ the man said. ‘Yes!’ said Arth.  This set alarm bells ringing as the man seemed more interested in when we would be out rather than home so we cancelled our arrangements for the following day.

11th May 2014. We, Arth & I, his brother and wife, who were visiting at the time, were all sitting out on the front patio at 11:40am when a metal, dark grey Nissan X-Trail pulled up opposite our driveway and just sat there for some minutes when Arth rose and walked out to the front gate the car sped off. A short time later while Arth still out at the front gate Mr Watter drove slowly past in his red Alfa Romeo whilst looking in towards our home. He too sped off when he saw Arth. 1 ½ to 1 ¾ hrs later the same Nissan pulled up in our drive and was looking in but sped off again when Arth walked out. We never received any flowers.

7th September 2014.  Received a phone call from Mr Watter. He became quite angry and called Arth a liar. Arth said, ‘Beg your pardon?’ to which Mr Watter shouted, ‘YOU’RE A LIAR AND THE WHOLE OF TOWNSVILLE WILL SOON KNOW THAT YOU’RE A LIAR!’ He also said that he had reported us to the Federal Police for breaching Court Orders for passing on information to his buddy, Dr Juergen Landmann. We have never heard anything from the Federal Police.

26th November 2014. WE received a text message from Mr Watter at 6:44am but not opened until 10:03am which stated, ‘your day is coming sooner that you think you fucking crims’ It was accompanied by a photo of the cover of the ‘Take 5’ magazine in which Mr Watter had an article regarding the missing girls.

We have received numerous blocked calls during all times of the night with no one speaking. Only , when a man said, ‘Have you found Cassie and the girls yet?’ Arth asked, three times for a name but was not given one, before the caller disconnected the call.

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

 

 

169 total views, no views today

What a pig , coward and bully this little man is ! #Leak41 #WikiDetectives

 

LEAK 41

 It is obvious that this PIG , Michael Watter , has had a great deal in telling his children what to say and do !

Michael Watter , threatening his twin daughters AGAIN  !

These children are extremely clever and point out to the grandfather that their father Michael Watter threatened them with not being allowed to see their mother again if they did not tell a lie to the police !

This little man Michael Watter is one very cowardly , despicable person !

 

 

Affidavit

 

I, Arthur Ernest Doubleday of 1155 Riverway Drive Rasmussen make an oath and state that:

  1. On Tuesday 9th of October 2012, Bronte and Isabella Watter visited our home after school with their mother, Catherine (Cassie) Watter and supervisor, Mathew Morrison.
  2. We also had guests present in the house, Cliff and Cilla Jerrett and Nev
  3. The girls ran in after patting the dogs. They seemed excited to be here.  They raced to the kitchen to see the tiny egg one of their chooks had laid, and showed it to Mathew as well.  Then they went and started playing with their kitchen.
  4. After greeting everyone, Cassie said that she needed to make a phone call and went into a room and closed the door.
  5. Mathew called us from our guests later as Cassie was very upset.
  6. With the girls playing in another room, Cassie told us that she had spoken to her solicitor’s office and that there was a chance that she may not have any contact with the girls again.
  7. She did not have a chance to say why, because Isabella opened the door to the room and entered. Cassie told Isabella that she was upset because she had a sore tummy.  Bronte also came in.  Cassie asked the girls if they wanted to go and collect the eggs from the chook pen, and said that when they came back she would be feeling better.
  8. Isabella went to another room, got a bear to help her mother feel better and then the girls came with me out the back.
  9. On the way down (about 50-60 meters from the house) Isabella said that Mummy was very sad. I said she must have a headache.  Isabella said ‘No Pop’  She laughed, rolled her eyes at me and patted her tummy.  Bronte ran ahead to the chook pen to see her chooks.   Isabella then said that she had told the police that Mum said to say Dad was doing naughty things to us.  But she didn’t    Dad told us we must say that or he would not take us to see Mum any more.
  10. I simply said that you must always tell the truth, like Ackie McCacky McCartney – a bed time story I used to tell them when they were staying with us.

Sworn at:  ________________________    on the   ___________   day of   _________________   2012.

 

____________________________                                          ____________________________

Deponent                                                                                   Justice of the Peace

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

112 total views, no views today

Hell , this pathetic excuse for a man is an absolute disgrace ! #Leak39 #WikiDetectives

 

LEAK 39

This observation by Mr. Young says it all . Once again , only the blind will query it !

PUBLICLY RE INVESTIGATE THIS MATTER !!!

Watson Douglas Young 20 October 2011

STATEMENT OF OBSERVATIONS

RE; Michael and Catherine (Cassie) Watter

To whom it may concern,

My name is as stated above; I have known the Arthur and Heather Doubleday family since late 2005 and have since then had occasion and privilege to attend family and associate social functions that have included some and all of their children, grandchildren and spouses. I, along with my wife, Christine Young have attended social activities with the Michael and Catherine Watter family including their daughters Isabella and Bronte.

This contact has been of an irregular nature but has included Picnic / BBQ activity at the Strand, evening meals and breakfast BBQ occasions at the Doubleday home in Rasmussen, swimming activities with the twins at the Doubleday home and visits to the Watter home to view garden projects, assist with redecoration of the family home (painting) and at the invitation of the twin girls with Cassie’s approval, to visit and partake of baking the girls had done.

On our present stay in Townsville (we are grey nomads) and as on previous occasions, we have accepted the hospitality of Arthur and Heather Doubleday to stay on their property.

On this stay in Townsville, Christine and I were requested by Cassie Watter who is currently residing in the Doubleday home, to supervise a Saturday morning pick-up of the twins for an access visit by their father Michael Watter. This pick-up was to occur at the workplace of Cassie Watter on the morning of 15th October 2011.

When Michael arrived, as requested by Cassie Watter, I gave him an open bag containing two soft-toy mice and two mobile phones; I stated the phones were if the twins wished to contact their mother. This exchange took place in the foyer type area of the workplace.

We then proceeded outside to Michael Watters car, where he assisted his daughters to seat themselves.

I enquired of Michael Watter as to the time of the return of the twins, he replied ‘whenever’, Michael Watter also enquired if I was now involved in ‘this?’ I believe I replied that we (Christine and I) are here for personal and health reasons, I then informed Cassie Watter of this time-frame and enquiry once I had observed the departure of the twins.

At the time of writing this, the above is my most recent occasion of interacting with Michael Watter.

PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS.

As a parent and Grandparent I naturally make observations of the way people interact with each other, with their family, spouses and children, this, I believe is a normal human trait.

As stated above I have observed Michael Watter, Cassie Watter, Isabella Watter and Bronte Watter and their interactions or lack of interactions sporadically since late 2005.

The aspect that stands out is the majority of activity involving Isabella and Bronte Watter is attended and initiated by their mother Cassie Watter.

I have observed Cassie Watter carrying items for a social/play outing while Michael Watter walks some distance apart from Cassie, Isabella and Bronte Watter, engaged with his mobile phone, no assistance provided to his family.

On arrival at the chosen location, again the majority of occasions Michael Watter, when Isabella and Bronte are at play, with each other and/or with their mother, is seated or walking some distance away, again engaged with his mobile phone. Interaction by Michael Watter with his daughters Isabella and Bronte rarely occurred at the times I was present apart from partaking of food and beverage.

At the Doubleday home when the twins had a birthday party and other ‘multiple births’ parents and children attended, the above again was observed to have occurred. Michael Watter was seated almost furthest from the activity and played no part that I observed in the opening of presents by his daughters, food activity or loading of the presents in vehicles to take to the family home.

At Christmas functions, again it has always been Cassie Watter who does the interacting with the twins re; food, presents, praise, affection and attention.

I have observed Cassie Watter prompting Isabella and Bronte to interact with their father, Michael Watter, at the functions mentioned above, as the twins at times asked ‘where’s daddy’. Once an encouragement is postulated by Cassie, Michael generally includes himself in the activity. Self-initiation and spontaneity of activity with his spouse or daughters by Michael appears seldom.

The above is as best my memory serves me.

Watson YOUNG

Mast. of Counselling ( School of Psychology and Counselling, Carseldine Uni.).

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

323 total views, no views today

Sexual abuse , again , again and again !! #Leak38 #WikiDetectives

 

 

LEAK 38

Michael Watter , once again , you have been called out for sexually abusing your twin daughters !

YET AGAIN your daughters disclose the fact that Daddy is touching their private parts and then you have the cheek to refer to the disclosures as “ allegations “ . Your daughters disclose again that you are tickling their private parts and that they are made to tickle yours ! It is a terrible way of putting it “ tickling “ — just sounds so innocent doesn’t it Michael ? The damage you have done to your children for the rest of their lives is UNFORGIVEABLE ! The children continue to expose your sexual abuse whist you continue with your quest of self gratification — DISGUSTING little man !
It is again discovered that the children’s vaginas are red , sore and inflamed ! Not the first time is it Michael ! In fact this has happened on numerous occasions ! HOW MANY TIMES have you used your children like this Michael Watter ?

PUBLICLY RE INVESTIGATE THIS CASE !!!

This is a statement by Arthur E Doubleday.
9th Dec 11. In Rockhampton. Cass phoned to advise that court had removed girls to Michael’s care. Court claimed that Cass attempted to ‘set Michael up’ with the help of others.
10th Dec 11. Arrived home with new van. Cass completely devastated.
11th Dec 11. Cass & Heather to markets to see girls. No designated supervision (NDS) by Michael but Rotarians with Cass & girls. 5.45pm Isabella phoned very upset that Daddy very angry.
Sat 17th Dec 11. Cass had access visit with girls at Relationships Australia. Bronte made revelations that Daddy is touching their private parts still.
25th Dec 11 Michael came over with the girls. Says he is not happy with the girls being separated from their mother but considers it necessary until it is established why they are making allegations against him. Has Jorgan (Michael’s doctor friend from Brisbane & who told Michael that he should not have the girls full time) speaking to Cassie regarding the girls missing her. NDS.
27th Dec 11. Michael bought girls over for two hrs. Says Isabella told him that Cassie was going to take them to a women’s shelter until they had enough money to buy a home of their own. I said that it would have been an attractive option at the time that they were suffering your violence. Cass had told us that she had thought about going to a women’s shelter but had decided it would be better if she asked us if she could come here which she did. NDS
1st Jan 12. Isabella & Bronte rang & again when the girls start on general conversation they are cut off. They often phone back then are very guarded about what they say. Both girls fretting for Mummy and wanting to come home.
2nd Jan 12. Cherie from Bundaberg and the girls god mother, arrives. Mick brought girls over for a few hours Juan did not want to continue supervision and Mick said that I had made a racial slur about his skin colour which, of course is absolute nonsense and untrue. Mick asked a lot of questions about the value of items we owned ie car, tyres, what model no’s, how much etc? No talk of what might be the best for the girls so I suggested that it would be good if the girls learnt how to swim. He agreed but didn’t say when this might occur. Mick is totally ignoring the court order that asks that all parties work together for the benefit of the children. Mick accepted 2 beers but did not get involved in general conversation, at all even when the girls prompted responses from Dad on several occasions. Very disappointing. He ended up saying that Juan was not offended by anything I said. He just did not want to get involved in taking sides. Again it is not what the court is suggesting that it should be about the girls. All else should be put aside. (NDS)
3rd Jan 12. Mick brought girls over and they played games with Auntie Cherie and Mum while Mick watched cricket. They stayed for lunch & all seemed to be OK. NDS.
4th Jan 12. Twins Birthday 28 children plus parents expected, Birthday party organized by Cassie & Cherie 22 children Plus parents attended party from 4.00pm – 6.30pm and everybody happy. When the girls were leaving, Michael said to Cassie, ‘Trying to buy their love with ‘I’pods?’ this upset Cassie very much and she cried for a couple of hours. During the afternoon, Mick admitted that he had lied in court. He had contributed nothing what ever to the cost of the party. He was reasonably friendly to us and stayed for dinner, drank two glasses of wine. I came into the house at one stage and Mick was crying, I asked him what the problem was and he said that he was sick of all this nonsense, I said that it could be stopped as you have the power to stop it. Mick said. ‘How?’ my reply was that he should have lunch one day at a pub to discuss the situation and he said that he would like that as he is suffering from severe depression. Heather & I also offered to take the girls any day whilst Cassie was at work, assuring Mick that we would not allow Cassie home while the girls were here. He ignored our offer to have the girls and did not respond. The confession of suffering depression does not surprise me as Mick’s moods change in a flash. This behaviour has been noted over the past few years and has been discussed by ourselves with concern and thought that he may be suffering from schizophrenia or a psychiatric problem. It is worrying to know that the girls are locked up in this dangerous situation. The girls have become introverted and are still making disclosures of a serious nature. These violent behavioral problems of Michael’s are the very reason that the marriage failed. NDS
8th Jan 12. Mick brought girls over approx 2 -2.30pm for a couple of hours. Michael was very subdued and quiet. Looked worried and spoke little. Accepted a soft-drink. Very strange as I could not connect with him at all. Girls seemed to be OK. NDS
10th Jan 12. Mick brought girls over for 3hrs. He had 3 beers and dinner, Very friendly. Said that he could not mow the lawn as he no one to watch the girls. I offered to have them anytime and ensured that Cassie would not be present at any time whilst the girls were in our care. He made no comment at all re the offer. Mick revealed, again, that he suffers from depression and has done for some years. I offered my sympathy. He also complained that the girls wake at 6.ooam every morning and he is not used to this as it normally takes him ½ to ¾ hr to wake up. Strange to say this when he claimed that he was the girls primary carer since their birth. There is no daoubt that being the primary carer is to much for Mick to handle. Girls very quiet and would not talk when spoken to just put their heads down. NDS
12th Jan 12. Mick brought girls over. He very quiet, spoke little, accepted one beer and left without buckling up the girls seat-belts. Just drove out, Very moody, never spoke to the girls mother or grandmother. Again we offered to baby-sit the girls while Cassie was at work but did not acknowledge the offer or reply. Very moody and strange. Earlier I had been out having the van serviced when Mick first arrived and when I came in, I parked the van down the back just behind the pool and as I walked past to say ‘Hello’. Cassie & Isabella were sitting on the step with Bronte nearby in the water. I was standing behind them about to speak when Cass Asked the girls if they had had a sleep before they had come over. Isabella said, ‘Yes! Bronte slept in our room and I had to go into Daddy’s room and sleep with him he tickled my private parts and I had to tickle his.’ Cass changed the subject and asked Bronte if she had a good sleep. Bronte said that Isabella had to go into Daddy’s room with him and I had to sleep in my own room. NSD
15th Jan 12. Mick and the girls arrived at 8.45am and had not had breakfast. Both girls crying and Isabella said that she didn’t want to live with Daddy anymore as he is too angry. I cooked breakfast on the Barbie for everyone, including Mick. The girls were crying when they left. Mick never said ‘goodbye’ to anyone, just jumped in the car and drove off. Very concerned an so worried for the girls. Did not mention my concerns to Heather or Cassie. Mick clearly has a serious anger problem and is not handling full time care of the girls at all. On Jan 4th I offered to talk with him when he was upset. He had liked the idea and said that he would ring and arrange lunch. He still has not rung. Strange. NDS.
16th Jan 12. Went to lawyers with Cass to discuss contravention breaches by Michael. ie. ‘Mummy, Daddy says that you don’t want us anymore. Isabella has made several disclosures to Cassie, Heather and me, of sexual interference to her by her father. Cassie is devastated as she cannot report these disclosures, which is extremely upsetting. We are all at a loss as to know what to do. Bronte said that Daddy doesn’t like you or your family and we shouldn’t either. Very hard to take.
17th Jan 12. Mick and girls over. Girls very unhappy. Heather cooked dinner and gave some to Mick. He also had a glass of wine. Quiet and moody and no goodbyes of thank you when leaving, just into the car with girls and drove off. NDS.
19th Jan 12. Mick brought girls over at 4.30pm. Once again girls complained of sexual interference by Daddy. The girls saying that Daddy put one of them in the girls room and the other has to go to Daddy’s room and he tickles their private parts while they tickle his. Once again Heather and Cassie devastated. Heather cried until after midnight and Cassie beside herself sobbing for hours. We don’t know how to tackle this problem with the current court orders in place. NDS
20th Jan12 Rang Brisbane for guidance on girls disclosures. Directed to Relationships Aust. Have and appointment in Feb. Also advised of grandparents access rights. Have a copy of legislation. Will discuss with Mick. Have asked twice to date with no response. Do not know why Mick will not grant us access visits.
22nd Jan 12. Sent text to Mick inviting him and girls for breakfast b-b-q. They arrived at 8.40am and left approx 12-12 :30pm. Again no thanks or acknowledgement for food or drinks. Was skiting about how good it was to be single and enjoying life, at present while girls are looking very jaded and are becoming more introverted as they won’t speak to Nan or Pop for some reason. They were so happy and friendly prior to the court order giving Michael sole custody. Girls upset though when it is time to leave. Obvious that they miss their Mum. NDS
23rd Jan 12. I am doing radio ‘sked’ while Heather & Cassie have gone to Hermit Park school for the girls first day at school. All went well for the girls.
24th Jan 12. Isabella rang Cassie as she wanted her Mum to meet her at the school gate as she had something important to tell her. Cass unable to go to school without Mick’s approval. She told Isabella that she would be seeing her this afternoon. They met at Willows where Mick allowed Cass and girls to shop on their own and Cass bought the girls new school bags. Mick arrived at our place, on his own. When asked where the girls were, his reply was that they are with Cassie and will be home soon. When they arrived, we all had tea and then Cass and the girls went for a swim where Isabella dirtied her pants again. This has happened several times since she has been in Michael’s care and she has been toilet trained since just before she turned two. After showering Isabella came out to the lounge room without underwear and it was very visible to me that her private parts were very red and inflamed. Later Cassie confided in me that both girls had said that Daddy had been playing with them and Bronte said that Isabella is sore but she was not. Extremely disturbing. Don’t know what to do with the current court order in place. NDS
25th Jan 12. Cassie extremely worried about girls’ safety and so are we. We this that we will stay home for the week instead of going to the Burdekin.
26th Jan 12. Cassie and friend went to Riverway and spent 4hrs with the girls while Mick played cricket. Came home crying as the girls had made further shocking disclosures about Mick’s sexual interference with them and cannot report them. She cried all night. I don’t know what to do!!! Very upsetting!!! NDS but her friend a mature age 2nd year med student.
28th Jan 12. Received a phone call from Mick. He wanted to talk to me. He arrived about 11ish. He brought 2 six packs of cold beer. I thought that we were discussing depression. He also brought a copy of the court order and the 40 odd pages of the findings. Again he did not mention his depression. He was very friendly but strange and seemed to want me to criticise the magistrate’s ruling. I made it very clear that I accepted the ruling & we should both be abiding by it by putting the girls well-being and interests first. He said that the girls were missing their mother badly and I suggested that maybe he should engage a psychologist of his choice to assist the girls to adjust. He flatly refused saying he would not do that as it would serve no purpose. He became agitated. I then suggested that he and Cassie should have tasks and maybe share custody as per the court ruling on 7 days notice to do so. His reply was that it will never happen and became visibly upset. He then claimed that Cassie had taken photos of Isabella’s private parts on the day we saw her all red and sore. (To my knowledge Cassie had not taken a photo but Isabella had jumped up onto the lounge beside me where I noticed how her private parts were red raw and sore. I don’t know what the girls said to Cassie but she cried all night that night.) While laughing, Mick denigrated all medical staff, psychologist, pediatrician and counselors associated with Cassie and the girls. Mick is clearly putting a case together to prevent Cassie from gaining access to the girls at the mention on 21st Feb. This is not in the best interest of the girls. Mick left very unhappy. I don’t know why? He appeared frightened and extremely agitated. He agreed to bring the girls over for breakfast. I had also suggested to Mick that he and Cassie should have taken Isabella to the doctor. He said never. There was nothing wrong with her. I disagreed. This visit appears to be a breach of the DVO order on Michael. Cass received an e-mail from Mick saying that there would be no further access visits by him as a supervisor whatsoever, effective immediately as he had to protect himself. Again Cassie confused and upset.
5th Feb 12. Heather & I visited the girls and Michael at the house at 20 Oldenberg Place. The girls were all giggly at the door and then disappeared. They had gone into their bedroom and wanted us to find them. Mick called me outside and again questioned me re the findings of the court, Child Safety and the Police. I said again that Heather & I accepted the court ruling and were abiding by it. Mick refused to allow access for Heather & myself as the risk was to great and he had to protect himself. I have no idea what he is talking about. I explained that Heather & I had no interest in interfering in the family split and all we wanted was to be able to spent time with our grandchildren but he kept on pressuring by asking questions that had nothing to do with access for ourselves. He kept saying that he had to protect himself. When I mentioned the deep depression he was suffering from, he started to cry, went very pale and started shaking. He refused to discuss the matter. Very strange. Mick had taken the girls to Brisbane early in Jan and he revealed that he never took the girls to visit their grandmother or grandfather (his parents) whilst in Brisbane. Seems odd. Now that access for us has been stopped, the girls have no access to any family member at all. They see their mother under supervised access for two hours each week and that is it. No access to uncles, aunties or cousins etc. which occurred each Sunday morning over a b-b-q breakfast which Mick seemed to enjoy. Mick is an only child who was raised with out his father. His mother has serious mental problems. We worry about our grandchildren having no contact with family at all. Only Mum for 2hrs per week supervised. Very strange. Mick says that is in the best interest of the children and that he has to protect himself.
This is a statement by Arthur E Doubleday.

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

127 total views, 1 views today

And the plot thickens ! #Leak36 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 36

So , now , out of nowhere , enter the Heilbronns !

Imagine people arriving at your house to tell you how to run your life when you have only ever met them briefly ! These same people then proceed to issue threats and abuse at an elderly couple telling them their grandchildren would be removed from the custody of their daughter and given to foster parents if there were further reports made to the police or Child Safety ! The threatening continues with the Heilbronns stating that the children should be given into the custody of the father Michael Watter to prevent said action occurring !
Who in the HELL do these people think they are ? They certainly seem to think they are omnipotent and show NO consideration for the Doubledays or their grandchildren ! We already know their feelings for Cassie ! They appear to think they have a great deal to say on what would happen with the children and we firmly believe this fact needs to be investigated further by the authorities when a RE INVESTIGATION is carried out ! Disgusting pair of individuals , so full of themselves , that they feel they can say or do as they please and get away with it ! There is more to come here good people !
The grandfather at all times has been civil to Michael Watter , something , which under the circumstances , we would not have been !
Read the letter good people and judge for yourself !

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

Dear Sir/Madam,

This statement serves to confirm that Mr Steven & Mrs Sherie Heilbronn arrived at our residence at approximately 4.30pm on Saturday 8th October 2011 to speak with Heather & myself. We had met these people briefly about 18mths ago at a local restaurant and another time at a rugby game but do not know them well at all.

On return from the girls’ access visit that morning (before which it took Cassie 30mins to convince the girls to leave, with Isabella asking to speak to Carolyn Seri as a ‘safe person’.) the girls reported that they had not, in fact, gone to the beach as their father had promised them, but had been taken to the Heilbronn’s house. Isabella reported that Michael had ‘asked her about Mummy’. She also said that the girls would now be spending ‘two days with Daddy, and two days with Mummy’. She was asked how long a day was, and she said ‘like today’. She was asked who said this and she said ‘Daddy’. She was asked where and she said ‘at Mrs Sherie’s house’. (They had been with Michael for 3 hours). Cassie (unknown to us then) had sent a text message to both Michael and Sherie asking that they do not have custody discussions with the girls as it was not an appropriate discussion to have with 4yo children. She had also said to Sherie that she understood that Sherie would support Michael as his friend, but to please not involve the girls.

Steven and Sherie were invited into our home and immediately started a sustained verbal attack on ourselves and our daughter, Cassie Watter. Isabella & Bronte were having their afternoon sleep in their room at this time. Sherie read out the text message to us and said she would never have that discussion with the girls. Cassie said ‘thank goodness’. Sherie then kept saying that the text message proved that Cassie was making things up. Cassie tried to explain but they kept interrupting so she stopped.

The main reason for their visit, however, appeared to be to convince us, as Cassie’s parents, that Cassie and the girls should return to be with Michael, Cassie’s husband. This theme was supported by threatening three times that the next time that Child Safety or the police were involved that the Agency would remove the girls from Cassie and have them placed into foster care and the only way to prevent this from happening was for the girls to return to live with Michael.

When asked about Michael’s violent verbal, bullying and mental abuse they both replied that this was just normal behaviour in all households. Of course we strongly disagreed and asked them to look around to find if there were any holes punched in our walls.

Sherie kept saying to Cassie that the only reason that the girls were reporting anything was because she was ‘promoting it’. Her examples of this included that the school had been asked to do a protective behaviour conversation with the class. Cassie kept denying that she was in any way promoting that type of conversation with the girls.

When Michael had been asked about Michael’s financial support for his family, the reply was that Cassie and the girls should not have left the family home. Heather & I are pensioners and not wealthy people. Cassie is receiving Centrelink support and we are managing okay financially. Michael was asked to help financially in a discussion a few weeks ago to which both myself and Ridley Plaisted (a house guest of ours at the time) witnessed – and he and bluntly refused saying that they should return home immediately.

We also pointed out to Steven and Sherie that Cassie has been attending counselling for domestic violence since 2009 in an effort to save the marriage but these counselling sessions have not had any effect on Michael’s adverse behaviour. In fact he had refused to attend more than a couple of sessions.

At this stage Steve and Sherie became very angry and Steven threatened Cassie that he would tell us something. Sherie said ‘no don’t’. Steven then told us that Cassie had been abused by her older brother for most of her childhood and that we needed to discuss this. He then said that we, as Cassie’s parents had failed her by not having much to do with the girls in the first two years of their life and that perhaps we needed to discuss this as a family as well. (This statement is quite untrue but we elected to only visit when Michael was not home – which was most of the time. The reason being that Michael made us very aware of the fact that we were not welcome. We had encouraged Cassie at a couple of points to leave Michael due to his aggressive and violent behaviour, as well as the fact that he did not assist with the girls or around the house, but she stated she was going to keep trying to work on the relationship. It was not an easy decision to not go there but we felt it was in the best interest of Cassie and the girls.) After Steven said this Cassie seemed to go in on herself and just nodded to everything they said. Steven started saying that Cassie had told him that Michael has schizophrenia and that he had offered to get him counselling.

At this stage Isabella started crying loudly in her room. We assume she had woken up and come down the hall and was upset by the conversation that was occurring. Cassie begged Steven and Sherie ‘please go outside’ and ran down the hall to comfort Isabella. Steven and Sherie did not leave even then. Cassie called down the hall to say that they could hear everything in the girls’ room and asked them again to please go outside. Again they did not do this. I then ordered them to leave the premises, which they reluctantly did, stating on the way out that the girls would be placed in foster care within a week. They said they were going to ‘take action’ but did not say what this would be. They told us that ‘Cassie has a problem’ and that she ‘needs help’.

Even after all of this Cassie still initiated a call from the girls to Michael that night to say goodnight.

We have ourselves seen how distressed Cassie is after the girls disclose something of a sexual nature to her. She does not display this in front of the girls, but waits until they are safety playing outside with us. We (and our house guests) have also never heard Cassie mention anything like this in front of the girls – or in any way ‘promoting it’. She has also never said anything negative about their father to them. In fact she seems to spend most of her time ‘talking him up’ to assist them in not being distressed by his visits. On one of these visits my wife witnessed the level of distress that can occur on Michael taking the girls. They were hysterical for over 30 mins and in the end they had to be peeled off Cassie to be put in their father’s car, with them screaming things like ‘please mummy don’t make me go’ and ‘please mummy I love you very much’. Michael was requested by Cassie to play with the girls in our house until they calmed down and were less distressed by leaving and he refused. Both Cassie and my wife were obviously distraught after this incident. I myself had heard Cassie telling the girls all morning that it was ‘their special day with Daddy’ and that ‘they would get to see how their garden had grown’ etc etc etc with them still saying that they didn’t want to go with Daddy because he was scary.

Heather and I took Cassie to the Domestic Violence Resource Centre to take out a D V O against Michael and his friends to prevent this from happening in the future as these sorts of events are extremely upsetting for all concerned especially the girls. Although we had encouraged her to do so before, she had stated that it was safer now that they had left the house and she was living with other people. However now she realised that she also needed to protect the girls and herself, but that we also need protection from both Michael and his friends. Steven had already been asked via Cassie’s solicitor to not contact her any more due to text messages he had sent threatening to email us, department of Communities etc and ‘disclose her abuser’. It appears that they received this information from Michael. Cassie reported to us that Michael had told her he felt he had every right to tell people this.

The D V O does not prevent Michael from coming tour home to pick up the girls for access visits in fact, Michael was told, at the very beginning of the separation, that he was welcome to visit the girls at any reasonable time. All he had to do was phone to check that we were home and that the girls were not asleep.

The department is welcome to visit our home at any time unannounced to check on the welfare and safety of the girls.

Yours sincerely

Arthur E Doubleday

99 total views, no views today

The little man has two brain cells — one is lost and the other is looking for it ! #Leak33 #WikiDetectives

 

LEAK 33

Once again ( and why are we not surprised ? ) Michael Watter is shown to be a selfish , self serving individual ! He cares not for the discomfort of his twin girls , nor does he care about their health and well being ! A continuous trail of selfishness ! Are your followers on this page reading all of this Michael Watter ? If they are ( and I am sure they are ) there will come a day when ALL the lies you have told them and all the deceptions you have carried out will suddenly land BANG at their feet and with the penny having finally dropped we would expect these same people to stand up and be counted when there is a PUBLIC RE INVESTIGATION . Anyone who has two brain cells and is blindly supporting you without having read the LEAKS from beginning to end are a disgrace as they will see ALL and understand where we are coming from once they do read them ! Do NOT be scared –READ THEM good people ! Do not be like Michael Watter who has two brain cells – one of them is lost and the other one is looking for it !

The common thread of child sexual abuse is predominant here again . The common thread of lies from Michael Watter is abundant once again . The love and care shown by the mother in all these threads is apparent . The care and concern by Cassie for the children’s well being and health is obvious .

The children’s sexual abuse is horrific and one wonders how often these children have been sexually abused and by WHOM !! Don’t worry Michael Watter as we will be coming to that in a future LEAK !!

 

 

On Tuesday evening (6th September 2011) I was in the company of Cassie Watters and her two daughters Bronte and Isabella. Isabella had not been well and her antibiotic medication was left at The Cathedral Pre-Prep Centre.

The girls’ father picked them up after school and left Isabella’s medication behind.   It was not until after tea when Isabella said to her mother that “Daddy would not go back and get her medicine” to which Cassie replied “Never mind we can get some more, and if not, I will go to the school early in the morning and pick the medicine up.

Immediately after their father returned the girls to their mother, Cassie requested that I assist her in taking them to the GP as an ‘extra pair of hands’. Bronte was obviously unwell, with a bright red rash on most of her body, and hot to the touch. Bronte was diagnosed with a viral illness by the GP at My Family Doctors. After the doctors we went immediately to a late-night chemist so that Cassie could purchase some children’s panadol. Isabella asked if we could get her medicine too, and repeated that she had asked her father to return to school to get it for her. Cassie said that she would give Isabella some panadol until the morning.

Both girls were unwell and did not attend school the next day.

At no time did I hear Cassie belittle or say anything derogatory against the girls’ father in front of them.

On Monday 12th September 2011, Cassie requested that I be with her while she was bathing the girls. Cassie washed Bronte and Isabella, then they had fun playing and splashing in the bath.

Playing games consisted of selling the animal toys for some outlandish amounts of pretend money to Cassie and me. When all the animal toys were sold Bronte layed on her back, with Isabella laying tummy down on top of her sliding up and down in the bath. Cassie asked the girls ‘What are you doing’ and they said ‘the same as last night’. She then said ‘where did you get that from’ and they said ‘Daddy – it is our funny hugs’ and they both laughed. Cassie then redirected their play to the bath toys, pretending to sell them (toys) back to the girls.

We continued on playing games with the girls until it was time to get them out and into their pyjamas.

Friday 30/09/11

Sometime early in the afternoon Cassie said that Isabella would like to speak to me about her unhappiness regarding a visit with her Daddy later on. I talked with Isabella and did ask why she felt scared, and didn’t get any response, but she wanted Cassie to tell me what was wrong. When asked if it was about staying the night with Daddy, she said “yes” but did not give any reason why.

Later on Cassie asked Isabella (as she was still very withdrawn), if she would like to speak to another safe person. She did ask for Storm (who wasn’t available) and then Carolyn (who didn’t answer the phone the first time so a message was left for her to return the call). Carolyn did ring later on and Isabella was happy to talk to her, but not about her “uncertainties” for her not visiting Daddy. Isabella had a happy chat to Carolyn.

Before Michael arrived I was sitting on the couch near the back door with Cassie and Isabella. Isabella said “Can you please talk to Daddy about playing with my private parts?”   Both Cassie and I said “Pardon?” and Isabella repeated the question and Cassie said she would.

Cassie asked my husband Ridley and I to be with her and her daughters when their father arrived to take them for an overnight access visit.   This access visit was requested in less than the 24 hour period.

We were sitting with Cassie and her father on the front verandah when Michael arrived. The girls were out in the front garden with their Nana. Cassie told Michael that she needed to ask him for some information at Isabella’s request. Cassie asked Michael “Have you touched the girls’ private parts? It has been said that you have and that it was yours and their secret.” He just ducked his head, grunted and laughed.

Michael denied any knowledge of such behaviour and said that they are only little girls and they would say anything. Cassie explained that they are very knowing girls and explained that they did know the difference between boys and girls private parts, as they have associated with boys their age group at Riverview Child Minding Centre and Cathedral Prep Centre.   Cassie also explained that the girls have nightmares related to their access visits. Cassie told Michael about a bath time episode about while splashing around Bronte layed on her back in the bath, and Isabella layed tummy down on the top of her sliding up and down. Cassie asked the girls ‘What are you doing’ and they said ‘the same as last night’. She then said ‘where did you get that from’ and they said ‘Daddy – it is our funny hugs’. (I was with Cassie and the girls during this episode of behaviour). Arthur asked me “Is that true?” and I replied “Yes”.

After this confrontation Michael said “So what happens from here?” Cassie was explaining that the girls were seeing a child psychologist and he interrupted and said we should call the Child Safety Protection police to lodge a grievance and request them to speak both him and Cassie, to be told that they would ring back.

In the meantime the girls had been off with their grandmother to play ball in the garden.

Cassie, Michael, my husband Ridley and I moved out onto the back verandah. Arthur & Heather took the girls down to the back paddock. When the return call from the Child Safety Protection happened Michael put the phone on loudspeaker. Both Michael and Cassie were spoken to. Cassie was asked what had happened and she explained that she had finally got a copy of “Everybody’s got a Bottom” and the girls had really started saying some things that were worrying her. Cassie was asked, if the girls were living with her and she said “yes” but Michael was to have unsupervised access to the girls this weekend. The policeman told Cassie that if she felt the girls were at risk, she needed to remove them from the risk or take the risk from them.   Michael finally said “I won’t see them” and Cassie said “That would be good and would also protect Michael”.   Michael just shook his head.   Cassie asked the police officer who would the officer on Monday and was told it would be Rob Garnett. She said that would be good and explained that only Bronte had been interviewed by the Child Safety Protection previously and was really lovely with her. Isabella was never interviewed. The policeman at the end of the phone said that nothing could be done to sort Michael’s issue before Monday when the appropriate person is available and suggested that maybe the girls stay with the mother with whom they are living until then.

Michael did not leave straight away, but was asking Cassie what the girls had been saying and Cassie refused to tell him. Cassie also informed him that she hadn’t asked the girls any questions because she wasn’t allowed to. He said that was stupid but he kept harassing her until Cassie was reduced to tears. My husband Ridley suggested to both Michael and Cassie that enough was enough and Cassie agreed.

In the end Michael agreed to leave and they both went into the house. Michael left via the front door then went around the side of the house to the back paddock and found the girls with their grandparents. Isabella came back to the house running to her mother. Bronte stayed with her father while he was talking to Arthur in front of the vehicle. I did go out to the car and say to both Michael and Arthur nothing should be said in front of Bronte and then I went back inside.

 

I am unsure of the date.   After a visit to Carolyn the child psychologist I was in the company of Cassie and the girls when they went shopping.   This was a happy experience, with Cassie going through the toy department of Big W to buy them some play toys so that they had something of their own to play with at Nana and

Poppy’s place. They had a lot of fun choosing with Cassie’s help, fairy dolls, skipping ropes, toys for their dolls house etc. There was a lot of laughter.

After the shopping expedition we returned home and put the groceries away after which Cassie decided to go back to the house in Kelso and get some of the girls toys and desks and dolls house, as she had been given permission from her parents to make one of the spare bedrooms into a toy room for them.

Cassie told and Arthur what she wanted loaded into his Ford which was a large writing desks, a dolls house, some books and other small toys and games to make their playroom at Nana and Poppy’s home into a place of learning, writing, colouring, drawing or painting and playing games, where the girls would gladly play together, or enjoy doing their own thing.

My husband Ridley was also there with our vehicle and loaded it with some of Cassie’s belongings (mainly clothing) which did not fit into Arthur’s car.

Cassie left quite a few of the childrens’ toys and clothing behind so that there was something there of theirs for future visits with their father.   Colouring pencils and books that Michael had bought the girls since separation were left and Cassie certainly wasn’t in any way ruthless in clearing out the whole house to be spiteful.

 

I was in the company of Cassie and the girls a couple of occasions when they went shopping. Cassie purchased quite a few things for the girls because they had moved out of home and she was reluctant to take things from the previous house.

 On Saturday 8th October 2011 I was in attendance when Michael was picking up the Bronte and Isabella for an access visit. The girls had retreated to the swimming pool area as they did not want to go with their father. Cassie was with them trying to calm them. While Cassie and the girls were around the swimming pool, Michael came up to me and said “As you have been brought into this you need to know that I have been cleared by Child Safety. Were you told?”

He also said “The Child Safety said that the children could be taken away from both parents.”

I walked away from Michael and into the house as he was physically too close to me and he was visibly very angry.

Michael got Bronte and followed me.

Soon Cassie came in with Isabella. Isabella was still saying that she did not want to leave with her father even though Cassie was encouraging her by saying things like ‘I am sure you are going to have a lovely day’, ‘You are going to have a GREAT time at the beach’ etc.   Isabella said to Cassie that she was telling her ‘safe person’ (Cassie) and yet she was doing nothing to help her.   Isabella then asked to speak to Carolyn Seri (her child psychologist).

Michael heard this, shook his head and stormed out of the house with Bronte in his arms.   Isabella did speak to Carolyn and after a while agreed hesitantly to go. All three of us stood up from the couch and walked towards the front door. When we got there Isabella stopped again and repeated that she didn’t want to go.   Cassie picked her up and hugged her and again started telling her about the exciting morning at the beach she was going to have. Cassie carried Isabella to the car and clipped her in. Isabella just went silent and dropped her head.

Personally, I have found Cassie to be an excellent mother with her patience in dealing with the girls. Cassie is thoughtful and mindful of the childrens needs in a caring manner without being overbearing. I have been with Cassie when she plays games like snakes and ladders and then they make games of counting when Isabella is “hoola hooping” or skipping. Bronte loves her scooter and is not allowed on it until she has her helmet and safety knee pads on. Bronte puts the safety gear on by herself, but if has difficulty she is quick to ask for assistance. Since having the trampoline, she supervises their play and there is much laughter while they bounce up and down. The play sessions have always had a lot of love and laughter being shared around by the girls and their mother.

Cassie regularly reads to the girls and they both have their favourite books which they can just about read by themselves. The girls have a large map of the world on the wall and Cassie shows them where the different places which they talk about are. As Isabella has special dietry needs because of her allergies to certain foods I have seen Cassie and the girls cooking together to make special treats. Cassie sets a large mat on the kitchen floor with all the ingredients and pans for mixing and cooking with set out. They are guided by Cassie when and where to put the ingredients, to stir etc and put the mixture into the cooking utensils. Cassie purees and freezes vegies and adds them to everything the girls cook with her – even the cakes we saw them make. Cassie, of course, puts the pans in the oven for safety reasons.

The girls are taught how to look after their animals. Bronte said to my husband one day when he was getting water for the dog, “you need to tip the old water out before putting new water in there.”

Cassie is sensitive to the fact that Michael is the girls’ father. I have never heard her raise her voice to the girls, or on any occasion speak adversely about Michael to or in front of the girls. If the girls need discipline, they are given it strongly but lovingly, by being asked to have “time out” until they can behave. Generally their behaviour is very “normal” and they are a joy to be with.

When it is time for Michael’ access visit I have heard her always being encouraging and telling them that they will have a happy time with him.

When the girls return from access visits I have never seen Michael greet the girls with any demonstrative actions and there are certainly no hugs or kisses for the girls when saying “goodbye”. The girls are always happy to return back to Cassie and literally run to her on their return from their outings with their daddy and jump up on her to get their hugs.

The girls behaviour towards Michael is very hesitant and certainly not spontaneous and filled with happy anticipation. One night I was at the dining table with a group of people busy doing my crochet and Michael was close by with Bronte while she was finishing her tea.   Bronte kept on saying to her daddy in a soft voice “You have to have love in your heart Daddy”, to which there was no reply, just a grunting noise. Bronte repeated the sentence a couple of times and the reply was just the same, nothing and just a low grunting noise.

Signed:

(Mrs) Patricia Plaisted

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

 

 

 

146 total views, no views today

Mr. “I love me – only me – who do you love “? #Leak28 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 28

Note this lady’s comments regarding Cassie’s concern and care for the well being of her children !

Note also the comments relating to the kind , caring , loving and unselfish father !

What do you the reader take from that observation ?

19 October 2011

To whom it may concern

I have known Cassie Watter since 2002 and have been a confidant for her over the years.

At that time Cassie was working for Westpac Banking Corporation and Michael was employed by Queensland Health. Cassie was also involved in renovating houses and selling them for a tidy profit. She would come up with a design for the properties and then complete most of the work herself. On some occasions, she may have employed tradespeople and Michael may have helped, but the overall renovations and decisions were made by Cassie. She often told me that Michael was not interested in renovating and wouldn’t assist in the renovations. She advised me that he would tell her that it was a waste of time and he didn’t want to renovate. I am aware that she would do the majority (if not all) of the research for purchasing new properties and he was often sceptical of her decisions.

On many occasions she has confided in me of difficulties she has experienced in her marriage, especially Michael’s extreme mood swings. She advised me of emotional abuse and on one particular occasion in 2004 she visited me at my unit in Kedron and told me that she intended to leave him and asked if it would be okay to move in with me. She did not follow up on her intent on that occasion and continued to work on her marriage.

I have visited Cassie and Michael on a few occasions in Townsville and during those visits it was evident that Cassie was the primary care giver for Isabella and Bronte. She organised meals, baths and entertainment for the girls as well as overseeing all medical matters. The girls had severe food allergies and they were prone to illness. Cassie was dedicated to ensuring that the girls were eating enough and to finding out which foods were causing them harm. As requested by health professionals, she kept a detailed account of what they ate, which led to revelations about what the girls were allergic too. Cassie advised me during that time that Michael felt she was overacting, even though she was simply doing the best for her children.

During my visits, I observed Cassie watching the children on many occasions while Michael played computer games or was on the internet. From my experience with the family, it seemed that Michael did not spend very much one-on-one time with the girls. His interest in them seemed limited which is why his interest now surprises me and gives me the impression that he is simply trying to be vindictive and is not considering the needs or concerns of the children.

During a holiday in Cairns in the June/July holidays this year I spent time with Cassie and the girls and was there when Cassie would call Michael so that the girls could speak to him. I found it odd that the girls were not interested in these phone calls and sometimes only one of them would talk to him. Cassie always encouraged the girls to talk but they simply weren’t interested. I particularly recall on one occasion that Bronte went to her room saying that she didn’t want to talk to her dad, while Cassie was able to convince Isabella to speak to him. The conversation seemed stilted and quite awkward even though she would have had a significant amount of information to tell him after an action-packed day.

I am aware that Cassie has attempted to salvage her relationship with Michael on a number of occasions, including counselling, but there continues to be ongoing issues. I have never heard Cassie say anything negative about Michael in front of the girls. Whenever I have been with them she has encouraged the girls to interact with him.

I find it strange that she does need to encourage them to interact with their father as in other family relationships I have experienced children tend to be excited to see an “absent” parent. This was not the case when I visited the family recently, not long after Cassie separated from Michael. Michael came to visit on Father’s Day and once again the girls did not show an interest in his visit and the interaction seemed quite awkward.

Before he arrived, Cassie suggested I help the girls make a card each for Michael for Father’s Day. Isabella obliged however Bronte didn’t want to make him one, choosing to make a card for her grandfather instead. Cassie wanted the girls to spend Father’s Day with Michael, however Isabella was sick and had been to the doctor the day prior and was prescribed antibiotics. She was not well enough to go out with him, so Cassie tried to convince Bronte to spend some time alone with him, but she was not keen to do that at all. When Michael arrived, Cassie encouraged the girls to interact with him and suggested games/activities for them to play with him. Neither of the girls seemed very interested in the interaction. Michael was invited to stay for a BBQ brunch by Cassie’s father but he chose not to join the family.

I believe that Cassie has always acted in the best interests of her children and continues to do so.

Regards

Cherie Clancy (B.Arts/B.Education)

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

72 total views, no views today

#FreeMissingWatterTwins #PressStatement7

As previously advised we will NOT stop this campaign until a RE INVESTIGATION takes place into the obvious ineptitude AND corruption relating to this case .We have now broadened our exposure of this problem and await contact from the relevant authorities .

Michael Watter’s threats continue .

The children and their mother are still on the run !

Wouldn’t you be on the run considering the evidence already provided ?
Whilst all of you sit back and do NOTHING these poor children will remain in hiding when what is needed is URGENT help and counselling .
What are YOU Malcolm Turnbull doing about this disgrace ?
What are YOU the Federal Police doing about the RE INVESTIGATING this matter ?
What are YOU the media doing to expose this case other than to publish one sided reports from Michael Watter ?
How about publishing the truth for a change or is that too much to ask ?
What have you Judge John Coker done to rectify your misdeeds ?
By doing NOTHING you are ALL paedophile enablers !

RE INVESTIGATE

89 total views, no views today

#FreeMissingWatterTwins – Michael Watter Threatened Supporters – Press Statement 3

Michael Watter , the MASTER of lies and misinformation has posted on his “Help Find Isabella and Bronte page that we “ Supporters of the mother have started a website stating they have kept photographs of the girls genitals taken by the mother and that they are willing to share them. They have also published police interviews with my four year old children. “

He has also defamed one of the good ladies who has posted her analysis of him on the page — what a big brave man this pig is !

What he does not mention is that this , putrid , bullying . coward of a man , Michael Watter has the identical photographs of his child’s genitalia as we have and the reason being is they formed part of the case against him !

Unlike us who will keep this evidence for a future RE INVESTIGATION, he no doubt looks at them daily !

Ask him to tell you how INFLAMED , SWOLLEN AND RED THE LITTLE GIRL’ S VAGINA IS ? Forgot to mention that little fact Michael ?

He also doesn’t tell you HOW MANY times the children mention his sexual abuse in the interviews ! I wonder why ?

Perhaps have another look at the interviews and share them far and wide because believe me , that is exactly what I am doing !

Video one:
http://bit.ly/missing-twins-vid

Video Two
http://bit.ly/missing-twins-vid-2

Ask the little man how many times he blocked me on his page today ?

Ask him WHY he doesn’t share our page so his “ followers “ can see for themselves what the other side of the story is and make their own minds up !

We are open about it AND we share our evidence and we delete NO posts unlike Mr. Open And Honest Michael Watter !.

He spends his whole day blocking my posts on his page and I spend my whole day placing our links in places he cannot block them ! I even refer to his page so others can see both sides of the story .

I place the links on his page just to keep him on his toes — those toes used to be six feet long ! Now they are down to a few millimetres !

If this useless , pathetic , excuse for a human being , would sign the petition and share it then perhaps credence would be given to some of his lies and fairy tales AND if he calls for a public RE INVESTIGATION into this case instead of begging for his sexual toys to be returned to him then perhaps we would begin to believe him .

Filthy , child rapist that he is !

RE INVESTIGATE , FREE THE TWINS AND THE MOTHER CASSIE !!

134 total views, no views today

What does it take to make these paedophile enablers accountable ? #Leak26 #WikiDetectives

Interesting LEAK this is . A letter written to The Director Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian LEAKED by a concerned civil servant since the publication started on this matter .

Facts pointed out :-

  • Doctors Rebecca McGowan and Kevin Arlett reported sexual abuse against Bronte by the father
  • Michael Watter was served with a Domestic Violence Order
  •  The judge John Coker awarded custody to the abusive father less than a month later
  • Sexual abuse by the father keeps happening !
  • Total lack of response to the report of sexual abuse to Child Safety .
  • Note lack of response by Steve Cannon of Child Safety to the reports of child sexual abuse .
  • Note the actions of ALL officials involved – NO ACTION , probably part of the fastest game in the world “PASS THE PARCEL IN AN IRISH PUB “

They just cannot get rid of the problem quick enough can they ? They just want to wash their hands of the whole matter by passing the problem on !

  • Rob Moelhoek , Assistant Minister For Child Safety – you were and are a DISGRACE !
  • Federal Member for Herbert Mr. Ewan Jones – you were and are a DISGRACE !
  • Merle McNulty , Child Safety Officer – you ARE a DISGRACE !
  • Magistrate John Coker –YOU are a PAEDOPHILE ENABLER !
  • Mathew Lupi , Director of Community Services – you are a DISGRACE !
  • Steve Cannon , Child Safety – YOU are a DISGRACE !
  • Child Safety – YOU are a bunch of PAEDOPHILE ENABLERS !

Every single one of you and the people you work with are a disgrace ! You are all paedophile enablers ! Thanks to you and your disgraceful inaction the father continued to rape his own daughters ! Thanks to all of you the mother had no choice but to run to safety to protect her children from further sexual abuse !Thanks to all of you the mother and her childrn remain in hiding ! Why don’t all of you stop and consider what your disgraceful actions , or should I say lack thereof , has done to these poor children and their mother ! You should all bow your heads in shame !Every single one of you make us sick to our stomachs !

PUBLICLY RE INVESTIGATE THIS MATTER

It is highly apparent that there are gross failings in the handling of this case !

Make these people accountable !

They must hide no longer !

Stop the cover up !

The Director

Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian

1st October 2012

Dear Sir/ Madam,

This is a very brief history of the Watter case. We, Heather & Arthur Doubleday, are the maternal grandparents of Isabella & Bronte Watter whose parents, Catherine Lee Watter & Michael James Watter separated on 21st August 2011 due to domestic violence, verbal and sexual abuse by Michael against the other members of the family.

Doctors Rebecca McGowan and Kevin Arlett reported sexual abuse against Bronte by the father on 30th August 2011. Child Safety officer, Merle McNulty, formed an opinion that the mother was coaching the children.

Michael Watter was served with a Domestic Violence Order on 15th November 2011, citing Catherine & Isabella as the ones needing protection.

9th December 2011, Federal Magistrate John Coker awarded full custody of the children to the father based on the opinion that Child Safety formed.

On the 4th February 2012 the father ceased all contact with the mother’s side of the family including ourselves, Aunties, Uncles, cousins and all family friends. He said that he needed to do this in order to protect himself.

The only contact the mother has had since 9th December 2011 has been with court approved supervisors to ensure that there is no coaching but the girls disclosures of sexual abuse by the father against them just keep coming.

On the 20th January 2012, we phoned the Sexual Abuse Hotline in Brisbane who referred us to Relationships Australia in Townsville who were very helpful and , I believe, passed on to Child Safety sexual abuse information which we had heard. There was no action taken by Child Safety.

On 8th March 2012, we visited the Federal Member for Herbert, Mr. Ewan Jones and reported our concerns. Mr. Jones’ office rang and advised us to contact Mr. Steven Cannon on 07 47 997 900, the senior intact officer with Child Safety and we were told that Mr. Cannon would return our call. This has never eventuated.

Heather met with Mr. Rob Moelhoek, the assistant minister for Child Safety, during a government visit to Townsville. He advised that we contact Mr. Matthew Lupi, director of Community Services here in Townsville. This we did by e-mail, a copy of which is attached.

We have still had no contact from Child Safety.

There have now been in excess of forty (40) disclosures by Bronte and Isabella, all with supervisors in attendance, since 9thDecember 2011. Supervisors and ourselves, have also witnessed serious psychical damage to the girls’ genital areas. These little five year olds are still with their father.

A new hearing is set down for 6th December 2012 and is likely to put back until next year.

If the mother is considered unfit to care for the children, they would be welcome here. Their beds are still made up with their teddy bears and toys still in place as well as some of their pets still with us. We would ensure that both parents could have equal access while in our care and would strictly enforce this.

If we are considered unfit to care for these little girls, please place them into a loving foster family unit until the court decides their future.

We seek urgent intervention in this matter.

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.
The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

112 total views, no views today

This father has a diarrhea mouth ! Full of it he is ! #Leak25 #WikiEXPOSED

LEAK 25

Please note we have the original of this document ! This disgusting , pathetic , little man’s comment “ I was accepted to study medicine at JCU but declined the offer as it would have meant “missing irreplaceable time with my daughters during their formative years “ has to be the BIGGEST piece of FAKE NEWS next  to his denials about the RAPE of his twin girls ! Need a shovel and a wheelbarrow for that stuff spewing out of his mouth !

What did you get a postgraduate masters degree in ? MASTURBATING ?

Excuse me again whilst I puke you pathetic little coward of a man ! You are such a kind , caring , loving , devoted father that you left the children with the Heilbronns more often than not ! You are one , lying , conniving , piece of SCUM !!

 

 

Name: Catherine (Cassie) Lee Watter (03/10/1972)
Ex-Husband: Michael James Watter (19/2/1976)
Children: Bronte & Isabella Watter (4/1/07) Twins

Summary

Profile: Cassie Watter 
Owner/Director of Child Health and Development Centre (Paediatric Allied Health Centre www.chadc.com.au). Opened January 2010, winner of Early Childhood Australia award for Service Delivery in first year of operation.

– Volunteer work –
Inclusion Works (Disability Inclusion) Board member and previously Treasurer
Rotary Club of Thuringowa Central previous year Community Services Chair, current Treasurer. Nominated by the club for (and received) an Australian Community Service award.

  • Multiple Birth Volunteer Support Program – Vice President and assisted in founding
    Umbrella Network (for children with a disability) – Board member
  •  Established Multiple Birth volunteer home visiting program in Townsville in 2009

Profile: Michael Watter
Licensee for Kinnect Townsville (Occupational Rehabilitation)
Exercise Physiologist

– Volunteer work –
Member of Rotary Club of Townsville Sunrise
22/3/2000: Date of Marriage
Bronte & Isabella Born: 4/1/2007
September 2009 Date commenced seeing Relationships Australia for Domestic Violence: (Matthew Power)
March 2011: Change in girls’ behaviour (inc terrified of being alone with father, wetting and soiling pants, Bronte fear of going to the toilet, withdrawn/ ‘zoned out’ and more aggressive)

March/April 2011 The girls saw Laura Browne (speech pathologist) in regards to their behaviour with their father.
Approx June 2011 Bronte saw Lucy Dall’Alba (Occupational Therapist) sometime towards the middle of the year in regards to toileting issues – being scared to go to the toilet.
mid/end July Bronte taken to GP as Bronte waking with extreme pain in vaginal area night for approximately a week with no visible cause for the pain.

14/8/2011 Date of Separation: (Michael left 15/8/11 for work out of town)

21/8/2011: Girls and I moved out of the house to maternal grandparent’s house with minimal items. No legal action taken at the time.

29/8/2011: Bronte woke up with pain in the vaginal area again. This time disclosed to myself and Nana (Heather Doubleday) that it was due to ‘Daddy hurting it’. Mum advised me to take her to the doctor the next day.

30/8/11: Girls had an appt with OT (Lucy Dall’Alba) re issues regarding separation. Bronte disclosed to Lucy (without me present) that her father had rubbed her ‘toushka’ (vagina). Isabella said he did it to her too, and then said she was just kidding.

30/8/11: Girls taken to GP (Rebecca McCowan) who checked with practice owner (Kevin Arlett) and then reported to Child Safety and the police.

31/8/11 Bronte interviewed by CPIU (Rob Garnett) and DOCS (Merle McNulty). I was advised that there was no indication of sexual abuse, but that Bronte had confirmed she was
scared of her father. I was advised to get the book ‘Everyone has a Bottom’ for the girls.
DATE Dr Rebecca McCowan referred the girls under a Mental Health Care plan to child psychologist Carolyn Seri for issues relating to separation.

11/9/11 Sexualised behaviour in bathtub witnessed myself– saying it was Daddy’s funny hugs in Mummy and Daddy’s bed during their daytime rest with no underwear on. That Daddy tickles himself in his groin area while tickling them and their actions would be consistent with a male masturbating.

12/9/11 Sexualised behaviour in bathtub as per 11/9 witnessed by Patricia Plaisted and myself.

13/9/11 I rang Child Safety and reported the sexualised behaviour. It was not investigated.

23/9/11 Girls’ first appointment with Carolyn Seri.

27/9/11 Got the book ‘Everyone has a Bottom’ from the library.

28/9/11 Bronte disclosed that Daddy had asked her to keep a bad secret. The bad secret was him playing with her toushka – but that he had said he would never do it again.

30/9/11 Isabella asked for Patricia Plaisted and myself to ask her father not to play with her private parts when he collected them that day. This is the date that I had apparently
told the child safety officer that I was going to “set up my husband so that he would never be able to see his children again”. This was also apparently the day that I sent Michael text messages saying ‘come over honey’ etc which was used in the judgement as proof that I was setting him up. My text messages that day were actually more about the girls still being scared of him.

2/10/11 Disclosure by Isabella to Carolyn Seri who reported to Child Safety. Isabella had drawn a picture of herself and her father with genitals then
said that he rubs her ‘there’ with ‘that’.

3/10/11 Isabella interviewed by CPIU (Rob Garnett) and DOCS (Merle McNulty). There were second CIPU officer and DOCS officer there but I am unaware of their names. I was advised again that there was no
evidence of sexual abuse but that Isabella had admitted that she ‘makes things up’.

4/10/11 – Mediation at Dispute Resolution Centre. Some items agreed but not custody. Savvy Francis (JP) was my support person in the mediation.
– Girls’ had session with Carolyn Seri. Taken by Poppy (Arthur Doubleday) as I was in mediation.
– Bronte interviewed by CPIU (Rob Garnett) and DOCS (Merle McNulty). Again advised no evidence of sexual abuse. Advised both girls had been direct questioned.

8/10/11 Stephen & Sheree Heilbronn (Michael’s friends) came (without invitation) to my parents’ house and said that they were going to ‘take action’ and that the girls would be removed from my care within a week if the girls and I did not return to live with Michael immediately.

10/10/11 Girls’ appointment with Carolyn Seri.

12/10/11 Disclosure to Christine Young (JP) by Bronte that ‘Daddy tickles me on the front of my bottom with no pants on naughty Daddy’.

12/10/11 Contacted by Merle McNulty advising a ‘mutual friend’ of myself and Michael had reported me to Child Safety.

13/10/11 Interviewed by Merle McNulty and another officer. Savvy Francis (JP) was present as my support person. DOCS said that they had no concerns in regards to myself as a parent.

17/10/11 Girls’ appointment with Carolyn Seri.

18/10/11 Bronte disclosed that Daddy had told her that he would not touch their private parts again and would not be scary again ‘so it is ok’.

19/10/11 Disclosure to Christine Young (JP) by Bronte ‘Daddy tickles me down there (pointed to vagina) with his third hand. Bronte pointed to Christine’s crotch when she asked where Dad’s third hand was.

19/10/11 Michael lodged a notice of child abuse against me and a request that the girls be removed immediately from my care with the Family Court.

22/10/11 Girls’ appointment with Carolyn Seri.

24/10/11 Report by Carolyn Seri for court.

25/10/11 Bronte disclosed that she had taught her father a new word. When he had said he would not play with their toushka’s any more she had said ‘no Daddy it is called a vagina’ !  Bronte and Isabella disclosed that Daddy tickles their toushkas on the couch and on the bed.

31/10/11 First court date. On arrival at court Michael’s legal representatives advised that they would drop the notice of child abuse against me if I agreed to him having two nights and one afternoon a week with the girls. My solicitors advised me that this had to be agreed to otherwise I could face the removal of the girls if we went to court. Family court order put in place.

2/11/11 Isabella very red and inflamed vagina. Pain when going to toilet. Reported that it was sore because she had wet her pants at Dad’s again. She said that she was scared
to go to toilet at Daddy’s house as he would play with her private parts while she sits there.

4/11/11 Isabella stated that Daddy was rude because he tickled her private parts

5/11/11 Bronte woke up with pain in her vaginal area a number of times during the night again. Night after overnight access with father. Disclosed a number of instances when the girls had been abused. Most I had heard before. She also said that Isabella had spoiled all Daddy’s fun because she would not tickle his penis and that is his favourite thing. Daddy got angry and chased Isabella and Bronte didn’t like it so she got Isabella and locked both of them in the girls’ room so Daddy couldn’t do it anymore. She was laughing at one point about how Daddy’s third arm stands up straight like a soldier when you tickle it. And that when the girls do this Dad doesn’t get angry any more. He laughs and laughs and laughs.

8/11/11 Isabella disclosed to Heather (Grandmother) that Dad has 3 arms. She pointed to her crotch as to the location of his third arm and said that he ‘feels me with this one’

12/11/11 The girls and I had been talking about ‘strong choices’ in regards to sharing etc. Bronte said it was a strong choice to say no to Dad when he asked you to play with his private parts. Isabella started crying and said that she HAD said no to him.

26/11/11 Isabella disclosed to myself that Dad is still fondling them.

9/12/11 Interim Court decision to give father sole custody and sole parental responsibility and for myself to only have supervised access. Magistrate John Coker.  Michael nominated himself as the supervisor for access visits outside of the Relationships Australia supervised contact centre.

13/12/12 The girls rang me to say goodnight. I had them on speaker with Susan Morrison present. Bronte said that she needed to talk to me about the things that Daddy said he wouldn’t do anymore. The phone was disconnected immediately.

16/12/11 Bronte disclosed that Daddy only plays with our private parts sometimes now, so it is ok.

17/12/11 Isabella disclosed at Relationships Australia that Daddy can’t live in the sandcastle she built – only us three girls because Daddy still plays with her private parts.

18/12/11 Bronte said that Daddy broke promises because he promised he wasn’t going to play with her vagina but he still does. This was said at the Cotters Markets to myself and partially heard by their grandmother.

7/1/12 I received permission to recover my clothing from the house – and did so immediately.

10/1/12 Girls visiting with Michael supervising. Isabella disclosed to myself that Daddy had made her have her day time rest in his room while Bronte had to stay in their room. She said that he rubbed her vagina again with his penis and his hands and that it hurt. I said nothing and she started crying and saying over and over ‘it’s the truth Mummy’ and then soiled her pants. After this I took them to the shower. Isabella laid down so I could clean her properly and out of nowhere pointed to her vagina and asked me if I could see where it hurt. It was red.

13/1/12 Had IT person check computers. Password had been changed at the domain, all emails kept for 2 weeks and contact Michael@kinnect.com.au Immediately fixed this.

15/1/12 Terry I have put this in as an example – I have been keeping a thorough as possible diary. Michael will put things in that are not in the correct time-line in order to make us look like we have done something wrong. However we can prove certain things incorrect. Eg he sent me emails saying that I was refusing to mediate a few weeks after I had sent him an email saying I had registered us for mediation and that they would contact him. In his affidavit he states that the Family Relationship Centre would not have an appointment for months – we were already in contact with them and a couple of days after the interim hearing I had a certificate from them stating that mediation was not possible because the other party refused to engage. Michael is very clever at manipulating evidence and events to be ‘just out’ in order to look like I am lying.

Michael and the girls arrived at 8.45am at school. They ran to me. Michael sat out on the front verandah with his computer and we went inside. Isabella was almost immediately sad. I asked what was wrong and she just kept crying. Bronte said ‘she just doesn’t want to be with Daddy any more she wants to be here all the time’ and then she became upset as well. I just hugged both girls and started talking about the happy things we were going to be doing that morning. After about 10 mins I convinced them to pop on their swimmers and we went for a swim. After a few minutes my brother Stephen joined us in the pool.
– The girls mentioned a couple of times that they just didn’t want to go back to Daddy’s house any more and Isabella said that Daddy said it was my fault that they were not allowed to stay here.
– Dad had made a BBQ brunch and called us from the pool for this. They both got out of the pool but when Isabella saw that Michael was also at the table she stopped and refused to go closer. I had to carry her to the table. Diane, Steve, Stephen, Mum and Dad were also there.
– The girls wanted to go straight back inside after they finished their food so I took them in. We took the kittens out and they played with them.
– When it was time to go Isabella said to me that she wanted me to come to the movies. I said that she would have to check with Dad. He said yes. I immediately asked Mum to come as well so I would not be alone with Michael. When we went to leave Bronte opened my car door and climbed in. I called to Michael and just pointed to her and he said they could go in the car with me. Both of their faces just lit up and they straight away started singing songs. When we got to the cinema the girls clung to me. Michael paid for their movie tickets. The girls chose where to sit (right at the front LOL) and Michael walked around the other side and sat next to Bronte. She moved closer to me. For the whole movie Isabella and Bronte both just snuggled in to me – it was wonderful. Isabella whispered a few times and asked if she could please please please just stay with me. I said not this time because it was Daddy’s turn to have the girls stay with him. She hid her head under my coat.

– When the movie was over Michael grabbed Isabella’s hand and walked her out. She pulled away from him and came back to me. When we went outside the girls and I sat on the grass. They did not want to get off my lap and go with Michael and were asking him to please stay with mum. I said to them that they should go and I would send them a photo and a text message on their phone and see them on Tuesday.
– Once the girls were in Michaels’ car I said very quietly at the front of the car that the girls were unhappy and that we needed to talk later about trying to help them. He got immediately angry and said that I had to fix myself. I said ‘what?’ and he said ‘you know what you mean’. He was very loud and the girls heard. Bronte started crying and Isabella’s head dropped. Michael got in the car and slammed his door and nearly reversed into someone else as he was leaving.
18/1/12 Received below email from Michael
Upcoming appts for girls for you to attend:
• Hermit Park SS interview 12pm Friday.
• Isabella specialist at TTH 230pm Friday
• First day of prep 9am Monday

19/1/12 Supervised visit (supervisor Michael). Organised for one of their friends to come (Emily). Isabella soiled herself in the pool again. She disclosed that ‘Daddy still makes me go to his room and can you please please please keep me here mummy.’ Bronte disclosed ‘Daddy doesn’t rub my toushka anymore, he just rubs my clothes there (started rubbing her vagina through her shorts) and he tries to get in the middle and sometimes he can’t and it makes melaugh and laugh.’

20/1/12 Attended meeting at Hermit Park State School and specialist appointment at 2.30pm. Michael agreed that I could spend the time with the girls and Chantell between the appointments as he was going to go back to work. The girls went in Chantell’s car.

22/1/12 Michael supervised visit. Isabella soiled her swimmers again when talking about Daddy being scary.

23/1/12 Attended first day of school. The girls did not have school bags.

24/1/12 I offered to purchase some school bags and Michael agreed to meet me at Willows after school. He disappeared while we shopped. He then allowed the girls to return to Mum & Dads in my car and we bought him some dinner on theway home (KFC). After dinner the girls & I went for a swim. Isabella said that Daddy made her toushka sore and then she soiled her swimmers again. I took them both to the shower. Isabella went to the toilet first and cried when she urinated. I looked and her vagina was red raw. She said ‘can you see where he hurt it Mummy?’ I just asked her if she wanted me to put some cream on and she said ‘no then Daddy will know and he will be angry’. Bronte laid down and pointed to her clitoris. She said ‘this is where he plays with me but it doesn’t hurt see?’ I put both of them in the shower and went and got myself a drink of water then went back in to check them.

Then walked out again and got their clothes and went back in (each time shutting the door). The third time I walked out I had a text message from a friend on my phone so I grabbed that and read the message on my way back to the
bathroom. Isabella got dressed first in a new shirt I had also bought her that day and ran to the lounge room to show it to Nana & Poppy while I dried off Bronte. At 8.57pm that night I received a message from Michael saying ‘why did u take your phone into the bathroom while the girls showered today?’ I replied ‘What?’ and he replied ‘When they were in the shower u came and got your phone then went back into the bathroom and shut the door. I didn’t see you take it in to be fair, but either way I just don’t think its something to do at present. I did not respond.

25/1/12 Received a msg today from Michael saying ‘my idea’ of going to the cricket was a good one and that I should be there from 7.45-12.30. He was playing cricket at Riverway – that had not been ‘my idea’. I thought that was a long time for the girls to be in the heat outside at this time of year and suggested that we spend the morning there, go for a movie (Muppets at 10.15) and be back before 12.30pm. I said I would ensure I would have other people with me. He refused and insisted that the girls stay in the Riverway vicinity and said he would have people ‘monitoring the situation’.
26/1/12 Have taken the following parts straight from my diary as I believe it is the event that was reported to Child Safety. Please not that this is not my ‘complete’ diary.
– Oh my goodness. Turn up to Riverway for 7.45am to see the girls. Made sure I had other people with me so that I would still be ‘under watch’ because Michael was not providing supervision. When he arrived he started talking about having talks with the girls about who can photograph their private parts etc etc. In front of the girls, Desiree, Shannon and her boys and Ray. I ended up walking away and the others walked with me. I said ‘this is just more court stuff’ and removedall of us from the situation.
– After our swim Desiree was chatting to her boys re stranger danger and being able to go to the police etc because there were some people that were a bit ‘wrong’ that were nearby and we moved away from. Bronte told her that
Dad had said not to talk to the police because they weren’t their friends and then Isabella was saying how Daddy plays with her private parts and when they play with his it stands up. She said he had a video of it on his phone. I was horrified because the girls have NEVER said anything in front of a ‘group’ of people before and I didn’t
know what to say and never thought I would be putting Desiree and her boys in that situation. I changed topics about the park/pool/grapes/anything and just kept my head down. Desiree decided to get Shannon to take her boys to the
movies and she stayed with me. Isabella was exhausted so we spent a great deal of the time inside the arts centre and she just laid down. I rang mum and she brought down some story books for us to read to them. Then they were saying that they didn’t want to go back to Dad etc. OMG. Meanwhile at no time was there anyone ‘supervising’ us. I gave them back to him 15 mins early because Desiree had to go and I didn’t want to be in the position where I was alone withthem. Isn’t that crazy!!!! I am scared to be left alone with my own beautiful girls. When I got to the car I just cried and cried.

27/1/12
– Went and saw Jo Lukins. As I was paying Desiree rang up and told me she had contacted Child Safety about what the girls had said. I was terrified. I so want to protect my girls but I
can’t be seen to be doing anything because no-one thinks that anything is wrong!
Met mum and dad at the school so the kids could all see the kittens. The kids loved it and the girls were so excited. J After we left I told mum and dad what Desiree had done then went to work.
Jo L rang later in the day to see if I was ok as she said she could tell that I had been scared when I left her office.

28/1/12
– Saw the girls at RA today – we had a ball. Have made a conscious decision to take KFC. Only get 1.5 hours and by the time I do the usual vegies, meat, cereal – half that time has gone.
– As I was leaving the supervisor told me that Michael had asked for extra sessions. I said that would be more than ok. Told him what had happened Thursday/Friday and said maybe that was the reason.
– Came home to discover that Michael had been to see Dad and tried to convince him that I have a mental problem and been coaching the girls and to say negative things about the court. Dad said he refused to agree to these things but had asked him about the ‘honey come over’ text messages. Michael had told Dad that the police had made that up!!!! What??? Dad said all of the evidence needed to be tested as he knew lies had been told.
– Met with Jojo and Rae Greaves. They were so lovely and helpful but it is just such a bad situation – no-one knows what to do!!!
– I went over to visit Lindy as I hadn’t seen her for ages and just as I was pulling up Isabella rang. It was around 7pm. She said that they were just going out to get some milk. I told her where I was and she told me to stay there for a few minutes so that she could visit. I said she would have to ask Dad. He said no. She said ‘he always says no if we want to see you’. I said I would be seeing her tomorrow and we could swim and play with the kittens so it was ok. She said she got some new lounges and I said that was so exciting where did she get them from? Mr Stephen & Mrs Sheree. I said that they were getting them lots of presents now and she said yes they were. I said that they liked the girls staying with Dad – which was wrong – I meant them being happy to stay with Dad. Michael got angry and the phone was disconnected.
– Isabella rang me back (this time inside with Lindy) and each time she went to talk about Dad the phone seemed to be moved away from her and there would be a silent period. I told Isabella that there were lots of people that loved her and asked her to tell me some of them. She was silent. In the end she asked what the beeping noise was but there wasn’t one. Then the phone disconnected. She rang back again and said that she had run out of credit. I said if she brought the phones tomorrow I would put some more credit on. She said she would like to ring Aunty Glenys and Aunty Cherie.
– I received an email from Michael at about 9.30pm saying that he was stopping access effective immediately. So the girls will now no longer see me tomorrow as he had promised. He said the HE was at risk by supervising!!!! OMG. If anyone was at risk it was us!!! He said it was my responsibility to find a supervisor.
– I just sent him a bland email back saying that there were several people willing to supervise. What a nightmare. I am hoping I still get to see the girls but even though his email was full of crap it would be SO much better to be supervised by someone else in the hope that an honest record of my interactions with the girls is recorded.

29/1/12
– Sent Michael an email with a person who would agree to supervise this afternoon so that the girls weren’t ‘uprooted’ so fast. I also sent him a text that the email was there and asked for a quick response so things could be organised.
– Rang around and got a list of several other people who would supervise and also emailed this list to Michael.
– Ray came around to talk to Mum & Dad and I. He was horrified at what Michael was saying on Thursday and I apologised again.
30/1/12 Received email from Michael at 10.13pm refusing all suggested supervisers.

31/1/12 Rang Chris Fox and made appt for 3.30pm.
– Went to see accountant – business pretty much zero value. Lucky I sold Dad everything last year too to help pay for all the legal costs.
– On way in to see Chris Fox got a call from Stephanie at Child Safety. Was very surprised to say the least! She asked if I could talk right now and I said I was just about to go into an appointment. She asked me for my understanding of what Merle & Rob had said about the emotional harm of the girls. I said ‘what?’ She said that the girls had been interviewed again. I was shocked. I had no idea that had happened. I did NOT want them to go through that again!!!!! She kept talking & I said I was in a very public place at the hospital and would like to ring her back. She said ‘oh you are at Emergency again’. I said I was not and repeated that I was waiting for an appointment. She said I had to ring back today. I agreed I would ring after my appointment.
– Had the appointment with Chris Fox. She said ‘there is quite a history here’ after reading the summary of events to

10/1/12.
– After I asked if I could ring Stephanie on speaker so that Chris could be support people. They agreed and we agreed that I would let Stephanie know that there were other people present. I rang up and Stephanie immediately started attacking me. I kept trying to interrupt so that I could tell her about other people listening but she would not allow me to talk. Eventually I raised my voice and talked over her and said ‘I need to let you know that there are other people also listening to the call. She stopped. Her tone of voice immediately altered. At a couple of points Stephanie appeared to either not be listening to me, or being unreasonable. Chris spoke to her about this a couple of times. The call went for about an hour. Stephanie said that if the girls were interviewed again she would substantiate emotional harm against me. I asked how that could happen when someone else reported, I was unaware of the report, and I was unaware of the interview taking place. She then switched to the trauma that I had subjected the girls to by having them examined. I said that I had asked for the girls NOT to have a forensic examination as they had not disclosed anything that would make me believe there had been penetration. She then said she had a report that David Neusome had examined them. I explained that Dr Neusome had told the girls’ GP to have me take them to the hospital. Stephanie said ‘and you agreed’. Chris stated that they would be concerned at the hospital if they asked a parent to bring a child and they refused to attend. Stephanie then changed subjects again. The whole conversation did not make sense to me.

1/2/12
– Got a phone call on the way up to Ingham from the girls. Nicola & Carmel were in the car. The girls started off excited saying that Daddy said they were going to see me again. They also said they were going to do ballet that afternoon. I said that sounded like great fun. They said they were going to see me tomorrow – I said that I didn’t know that – how exciting – Michael interrupted to say that they would not be allowed to see me. They both went quiet. I tried to cheer them up by talking about school, their friends, their teacher, their ballet, animals, fairies, people who love them etc etc etc. They were just quiet. I was on the phone for some time until they reached school.
– Attended clients, went to the deli & got the girls some pasta shapes and hearts.
Email from Michael at 9.45am – Cassie

Please provide contact details for all people you have suggested and I will ensure they are each very clear on the basis for my decision. I will speak with Andy King today if you advise his contact details.

I spoke with Catherine from the contact centre yesterday and they are considering more time there, but she doesn’t sound confident. She is not back in the office until Friday.
– Sent him a text with Andy’s number at lifeline.
– Received a call from Andy re what my thoughts were re supervision and the difficulty he may have supervising at all times (eg going to public toilets). He said Michael had asked him to ‘just stay in the vicinity’ rather than ‘right next to or 5m away’. I said I would prefer Andy to be close enough to hear everything to ensure I was not saying anything inappropriate to the girls. He said Michael had told him I was not to photograph the girls genitals. He is insane. I brought up that as it was summer I would prefer to not have the girls outside in the middle of the day. Andy agreed. He said that Michael had asked him to do 2 hours one day a fortnight.
– Attended Rotary as usual and got a call from the girls during the meeting. I went outside as usual to talk to them. I asked how ballet was and Isabella said she had been scared. I said I sometimes got scared when I tried new things too, but then I found out that they were fun and I made lots of friends. Asked her about all the other little girls and said I was sure they were both wonderful graceful ballerinas. At one point Michael said something and they both went quiet. Michael then started tickling them and they started laughing and saying ‘ow stop it’ but really laughing and enjoying it – but not able to talk to me. Every now and then Michael would say ‘don’t forget to talk to mum’ and then keep playing with them. I said that the sound of Bronte and Isabella laughing was the best sound in the world and said goodnight and ended the call.

2/2/12
– Received a call from Isabella on Bronte’s phone. She said she had no credit on hers. I told her next time she sees me to bring her phone and I will put credit on it. I also was in the process of telling her that she could still receive calls with no credit and the phone was immediately disconnected.
– Got another call later on. Same story – started off sad, he started tickling etc. I said I was really happy that the girls were happy and said goodnight and ended the call.

3/2/12
– Got a call from Relationships Australia and they have found another time for me to see the girls!!! OMG I just cried with relief and joy.
– Andy rang and said that Michael told him his services weren’t needed any more. So I guess he is sticking just to the contact centre now the girls said something in front of someone else.
– No call from the girls tonight L
– Susan & JoJo came over for dinner. They started talking about the girls and I just couldn’t stop sweating. After they left I went to the toilet and vomited. I thought living with Michael and his volatility was stressful but this is just horrendous.

4/2/12
– Saw the girls at the contact centre. They were angry – tantrums, kicking etc. Isabella stormed off when her ball went over the fence even though Kristy was going to get it for her. She went all the way inside the house and did not respond to my calls – not like her at all. They would not go to the toilet unless I walked with them. Bronte is W-sitting ALL the time too. At one stage when I suggested we read a book she walked away saying ‘I can’t read’. Isabella said smugly ‘I can’. And Bronte turned away. I brought out Green Sheep because Bronte knows it nearly by heart and we read the book together. She was really proud of herself at the end. She has NEVER not wanted to be involved with books before. They are getting so rough and angry and Bronte is losing so much confidence in herself! They did calm down with me to look at their 1st year photo book and loved that – will have to take it again. They asked about the kittens and I talked about how lovely and gentle the girls are with them and that they were so good helping all the children at their school to be gentle. One of them said ‘Daddy is rough with them’ and I changed the subject.

8/2/12
– Girls said that they would be spending each Friday night with Heilbronns. I said that would be fun.
– Michael agreed on the phone that I could volunteer in the classroom
– Michael also agreed that Mum & Dad could see the girls – but then hung up on me. I had told him that I would ensure that I would not be in the house the same time. He said that he had put in writing his conditions to them but I had not known this and apologised because I was unaware that they were already in contact.

10/2/12
– Call from girls – no sleepover tonight with Heilbronn. Sounded confused about it. Was a bizarre conversation actually. Michael muttering in the background and girls then silent for ages, then would finally come back to talk. Told jokes with Poppy and I and that got them laughing again J

11/2/12
– Contact centre. Girls rough – not following directions. Isabella wet her pants. No hats/sunscreen etc or bag/change of clothes. Bronte remembered her wish at Paronella Park nearly a year ago. That Daddy would go away and not be shouting. What do you say to that??!!! Told Isabella her wish had come true and all the trees were growing back after the cyclone. Bronte said ‘my wish didn’t come true’. I had taken them in stuff so we could make play doh + their aprons/chefs hats. Also watermelon, popcorn chicken and ‘donut pasta’ from Ingham. Also a heap of books and they each chose some stories to read. Had to really encourage please/thank you/manners/directions etc. Played a game with them when I first arrived and ‘found them’ hiding. They were so funny. Love them SO much!!!!!!!! What to do???!!!! – No call from the girls tonight.

12/2/12
– Got a call from Michael’s phone tonight – and just dead – no sound at all – like it was on mute. Rang back to his phone and both the girls’ phones and all went through to messagebank. Waited a while and then rang back again and this time got through. Had a good chat to Isabella then rang Bronte’s phone to speak to her. Then Michael said something quietly and she said ‘goodnight mum’ and then the phone was still connected but just background noise again. I kept saying ‘hello’ but the phone had been taken from her. Eventually I just hung up. It is sad that he thinks this is a game. There are little girls here that don’t seem to be of any consequence. Awful. And I can’t do anything for them.

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.
The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order.

 

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

 

 

127 total views, no views today

We think the expression – The father is a”WANKER “is most appropriate here ! #Leak24 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 24
Handwritten Diary Notes
Please note the revelations of the amount of abuse over only a few days ! Note the controls our loving , caring , devoted father tries to impose on his wife and children ! Note the HORROR when Cassie catches this man Michael Watter “ MASTURBATING  “ whilst lying next to his daughter !
  1. Note the financial abuse of his wife !
  2. Not a selfish bone in his body !
  3. Note the girls absolute reluctance to go ANYWHERE with the father !
  4. Note how scared the children are of the father !
  5. This is one helluva guy !
  6. Someone to be REALLY PROUD OF !
  7. He makes me want to puke !
Read the the link and :-
HELP US GET A RE INVESTIGATION !
HELP US FREE THE WATTER TWINS AND THEIR MOTHER CASSIE !
WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

70 total views, no views today

Swearing is just a lack of good adjectives in one’s vocabulary ! #Leak21 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 22
Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here) . The Domestic Violence Order was issued against Michael Watter on 09/11/2011. Custody of Cassie’s twin girls Isabella and Bronte was given to the father Michael Watter by Judge Coker on 09/12/2011
RE INVESTIGATE THIS JUDGE AND HIS DECISION
Reasons for the DVO were that Michael Watter used verbal abuse , emotional abuse , financial abuse and wilful damage to frighten and control Cassie Watter .
In addition to the above friends of Michael Watter , Stephen and Sheree Heilbronn , revealed private information about Cassie’s prior sexual abuse to her parents .The parents were 76 and 70 years old at the time .
Stephen and Sheree Heilbronn had previously THREATENED Cassie by text that they were going to disclose this information to her parents as well as anyone else she knew and the Department of Communities .
Note the loving , caring , kind , unselfish little man’s words upon entering the house and swearing at his wife in front of the children by calling her a “ RUDE FUCKING BITCH  “ as well as calling her a “ STUPID FUCKING BITCH “ and “ DUMB BITCH “ in the motor vehicle whilst the children were present .
Note the kind , loving caring husband’s approach to the counsellor at Relationships Australia because he believed the counsellor was biased against him .
Note the mother’s protective action of locking herself and the children in the bedroom to protect themselves from further verbal abuse by Michael Watter .
Note the kind , loving , caring , husband’s verbal and physical abuse of his wife whilst she “ WAS NAKED AND COWERING IN THE CORNER  “ .
Note the COWARDS BULLYING PHYSICAL ABUSE OF HIS DAUGHTER in grabbing her arm so hard that she was crying and screaming for her mother to take her . Note the little man was refusing to let her go and HURTING his daughter for trying to protect her mother . READ the details of the DVO and SEE what kind of a person this little man is !
  RE INVESTIGATE

WIKIDISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.
The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order.

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

114 total views, no views today

One perverted , sickening , little man ! Cassies Diary Part 2 #Leak17 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 17
CASSIE’S DIARY PART 2
There are no words to describe the horror these two children have been through with their perverted , rapist father !
THIS LITTLE , BULLYING, COWARD , WHO RAPES LITTLE GIRLS !! THIS PATHETIC EXCUSE FOR A SO CALLED MAN !! NEVER MIND THE FACT ,  YOU , HIS SUPPORTERS ARE ALSO TO BLAME FOR THE CONTINUED RAPE OF HIS LITTLE GIRLS !!
SAY WHAT YOU LIKE AFTER HAVING READ ALL OF THESE LEAKS —  THERE IS NO LONGER ANY EXCUSES FOR SUPPORTING THIS VILE ,SICKENING , PERVERTED EXCUSE FOR A MAN !!
THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE ABLE TO , READ WHAT “GROOMING “  IS ALL ABOUT AND THEN TELL ME YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GROOMED !! YOU DISGUST ME ALMOST AS MUCH AS HE DOES !!
Note Michael Watter , that I personally , will MAKE SURE the information on this page is spread to every sports organisation there is in Australia, to every junior school and senior school , to every sports club , cricket club , cycling club ( for Heilbronn’s benefit ) rugby club and golf club that I can possibly reach .
Note also Michael Watter , that I personally will MAKE SURE the information on this page is shared with every and any physiotherapist , Doctor’s Associations and Nurses Associations .
Note also Michael Watter , that I personally will make sure that not only will this information be dispersed AGAIN to all your relatives , I will continue to share this UPDATED page with the Heilbronn families , the Hann families , the Quinn families and the Kearney families .
Note also Michael Watter , that I personally will update EVERY Rotary Club and Lion’s Club in Australia about your child raping tendencies .
Note also Michael Watter , as long as I am alive , I will continue pushing this issue so that the matter is RE INVESTIGATED so that the truth will be OUT about you and your paedophile mates .
Think about it Michael Watter – you can NO LONGER HIDE under the secrecy of the family court and the corrupt individuals therein !
ALL the revelations of what you have done are now out there with supporting documents and testimony and as and when more information comes in , be certain , I WILL continue to share it and I DO NOT CARE HOW LONG IT TAKES ME !
Diary continued
  1. Note the Heilbronns lied under oath . Perjured themselves . Really good upstanding Rotarians they are !
  2. Note Michael Watter’s continued verbal abuse and rudeness .
  3. This poor excuse for a human being shows what a BIG BRAVE MAN he is by abusing his children ( never mind sexually ) by playing mind games with them .
  4. He tells them their mother never wants to see them again .
  5. He tells them their grandparents never want to see them again .
  6. The children draw pictures for their mother and he throws the pictures in the bin – oh what a MAN !
  7. Michael Watter says to the children that Cassie is not their mother .
  8. Michael says to the children that Sheree Heilbronn is their mother .
  9. BIG BRAVE MAN playing mind games with 5 year old girls .
  10. Note how he always interferes with the children talking to their mother as he hates it so much .
  11. Note the continued lying by the father to the children about Cassie’s friends and the supervisors and will not let the children talk to them . .
  12. Note the father’s comments to the children that their mother only wants to see them twice a week .
  13. Note Michael Watter keeps telling the children that they have  NO “ safe people “ .
  14. Note the father says to the little girls that their mother Cassie is not safe and only he is .
  15. Note how often the girls comment on words their father keeps using to put words , thoughts and ideas into their minds .
  16. Note how often the girls say that the father calls them liars .
  17. Note Isabella says Daddy won’t tell the truth . That he gets angry when she tells the truth  and it isn’t fair because ne needs to tell the truth and he won’t and and he still “PLAYS THE RUDE GAME “ and he said you made us say it but it was a lie .
  18. Note the continued abuse and bias from Child Safety .
  19. Note how often the children beg and plead not to go back to their father .
  20. Note how often the children keep asking why they cannot go back to live with their mother .
Note the continued disclosures of sexual abuse by the children :-
  1.  Isabella says that one of her wishes came true in that Daddy does not play with her vagina any more .
  2.  Bronte said her wish didn’t and Dad was still angry
  3.  Note Isabella’s disclosure to Rae Greaves that Daddy “PLAYED WITH THEIR VAGINAS IN THE ROOM AND ON THE COUCH “
  4.  Note that Bronte disclosed that Dad “MADE THEM PLAY WITH HIS PENIS “ and that he tried to make Isabella do the same and she said NO .
  5. Note Bronte said that Dad didn’t play with them but that Dad “ MADE HER PLAY WITH HIS PENIS “
  6. Isabella disclosed again that Daddy “ USED TO PLAY WITH HERS AND BRONTE’S VAGINAS “ BUT DOESN’T DO IT ANY MORE — NOTE THE FATHER’S COACHING KICKING IN !
  7. Note the disclosure that “ THEY HAVE TO PLAY WITH DADDY’S PENIS IN THE BEDROOM AND THAT IT STANDS UP AND THEY FOUND IT TO BE SCARY SOMETIMES “
  8.  Note how Isabella discloses to Rae Greaves AGAIN  “DADDY STILL PLAYS WITH MY VAGINA “
  9. Bronte discloses the the girls “ HAVE TO PLAY WITH DADDY’S PRIVATE PARTS BUT ISABELLA SAID NO SO I LOCKED HER IN THE ROOM “ – HOW IS THE SHOW OF CONCERN FOR HER SISTER ? BRAVE LITTLE GIRL !
  10.  Note Bronte’s disclosure “ THAT DADDY PLAYED WITH HER VAGINA TODAY “ AND WHEN ASKED TO REPEAT THE DISCLOSURE SAID NO .
  11.  Note Bronte said she was not allowed to tell anyone “ THAT DADDY WAS PLAYING WITH HER VAGINA “
  12.  Note that Isabella said “ DADDY IS PLAYING WITH MY VAGINA AND WON’T STOP “
  13.  Note , Bronte humming to herself ( happy ) says that daddy “ ONLY PLAYS WITH MY VAGINA SOMETIMES NOW SO IT IS OK “ – HOW SAD IS IT THAT SHE WAS SMILING AS IF IT WAS THE BEST THING IN THE WORLD ?              k Note that the children’s “ VAGINA’S ARE SORE AND RED “
  14. Note Bronte said “ DADDY DID PLAY WITH OUR TUSHKAS AND ISABELLA “
  15.  Note the child’s disclosure at the dinner table in front of MANY people that “ DADDY CALLS BRONTE A LIAR AND HE PLAYS WITH OUR VAGINAS “ She then says “ DADDY IS GOING TO BE REALLY ANGRY WITH ME “
  16. Bronte whispered to Cassie that “DAD ASKED THEM TO PLAY WITH HIS PENIS “ and that she wanted to tell Rhonda ‘.
  17. Isabella then says that “HE PLAYS WITH OUR VAGINAS SOMETIMES TO “
  18.  Isabella discloses to Ginni Hall that Daddy calls Bronte a liar and that she is not a liar and “ DADDY PLAYS WITH THEIR VAGINAS “
  19. Note how often this BIG BRAVE MAN is rude to the supervisors .
  20. Note the fatherly consideration when Michael Watter dumps Cassie’s and the girl’s household goods outside the grandparent’s gate in the open .
  21. Note the BIG difference in the continued concern of the mother for the children and the disdain and lack of concern by the father :– He is the epitome of selfishness !
  22. Note how the father continues to hide the children’s phones and will not read them their messages and tells them they will not get any treats until they hang up the phone .
  23. Note the little girl’s wish at the wishing well :- that they wish they could be with their mother for ever and then Bronte made a wish that she would not have to go back to Dad .
  24. Note the continued selfishness of Michael Watter in keeping Cassie’s goods and furniture even though he contributed NOTHING towards the purchase thereof .
  25. Note the father took the children out of a Christian school and put them into a public school and note that he said the children could no longer attend religious lessons :- very apparent which side of heaven and hell this putrid little man is !
  26. Note how much time the children spend at the Heilbronn’s in spite of the lies told by the father about them being in his care .
  27. Note how the ICL discloses private and confidential information to Michael Watter and his lawyers .
  28. Note Bronte said she was in trouble for talking to Miss Ginny – one wonders HOW MANY times this coward threatened his own children ?
  29. Note the girls description of the father deliberately killing the dragon fly . That incident alone shows what type of person he is .
TAKE NOTE OF THE FOLLOWING PAGES
PAGE 124
Dear Terry ,
        Last Thursday 29th March , I moved into my new house . I was not supposed to collect the keys for the house until Friday , and very few people knew that I was staying at the house on the Thursday night . I did not even know myself until mid-afternoon when I had the basics moved in and decided it would be a good idea to stay there , unpack and organise . Also the previous tenants had not cleaned out the cupboards so I knew there was going to be more to do than I hoped .
        I had placed padlocks on the front gates , and I remember locking the front door before I went to bed . My parents , Aunty and Uncle had been over helping me move , and I padlocked the gates on their departure . My father had purchased the padlocks prior to me moving in to place on the gates leading to the undercover area of the house so that I could store things under there . I moved two of the locks from the rear doors to the area , and placed them on the front gates .
        I stayed up quite late unpacking , but do not remember what time I went to bed/went to sleep .
        At one stage during the night I woke up suddenly as a hand was placed over my mouth and partially covering my nose . I could not breathe properly . I remember smelling latex . My right arm swung up automatically and connected with what felt like an elbow . It then rebounded and hit the bed head . The hand covering my mouth was removed . My arms were then pinned to the bed . I took a deep breath in , and was told if I screamed I would never see my children again . I recognised Michael’s voice . I froze . While keeping my arms pinned he leaned in very close and aggressively but ‘ quietly  ‘ started talking . I do not remember clearly everything that was said . I do remember being told very forcefully that I was a ‘ fucking slut ‘ that needed to ‘ keep my mouth shut ‘ . I was accused of ‘ sucking up to that fucking childrens’ lawyer  ‘ and that I would ‘ pay for it one way or another – and if you don’t your precious little girls will ‘ . I just laid very still as I was terrified . I was frozen . At one point he released my arms and started poking the tops of my legs telling me to ‘ spread them ‘ . After a few times I did so . I thought he was going to rape me again . He fondled me gently which for some reason terrified me even more . He then laughed and told me that I was too old and fat and ugly and hairy that he ‘ preferred them in the single digits ‘ . I started sobbing . He made a snoring sound and stood up . He said that I could do what I wanted but he was going to win . He said that the police would never believe me now . He said they knew I was just another ‘ fucking psycho bitch ‘ . He said if I told anyone he would never let me see the girls again . He left . I do not remember much after that . I stayed in my bed and just shook and cried until it became daylight . I then went to the shower . I do not know how long I stayed in there but the water was cold and I still stayed there . Then I realised I still had to move things . I realised that my parents were expecting me . I knew that I could not tell anyone . I knew that I had a chance of seeing the girls that day and I could not do anything to jeopardise that . I took a valium for the first time in a few weeks . They had been prescribed to me by my GP the day my girls were removed from my care . Then I started moving again . I felt like I was moving on auto pilot . I did take photos of the bruises after a couple of days . I did not do anything with them . They are just on my phone . Then last night ( Monday ) when I received a message from Michael saying that if Rae didn’t contact him within the hour the girls would not be allowed to see me something in me snapped and I broke down . I was with Savvy and Ray Francis and they did not know why I was acting as I was . They had just given me some new glassware for the house . I came home . I stayed up all night again . I have not slept much since Thursday .
        I decided to tell you this morning because I don’t think it is right that the girls and I live like this . I don’t know if you are Christian but I don’t understand how God is letting this happen . Surely there is something that can be done to help us . I just don’t know what . Whenever I have tried to do something it has been the wrong thing and we have just been placed in more danger . I don’t understand . I know that you and Mr. Fellows have been helping but I don’t understand . This can’t be right . I have been a nice person . I have tried my best to protect them and have only ended up putting them in harms’ way . I left with nothing to try and protect all of us . I don’t understand how this is allowed to happen . I don’t understand why the people who are supposed to protect us do not believe us . I don’t understand .
        Cassie
THIS IS A FATHER AND HUSBAND WHO HAS RAPED HIS OWN WIFE AND RAPES HIS OWN CHILDREN !THIS IS A POOR EXCUSE FOR A MAN WHO SHOWS COMPLETE ARROGANCE WITH EVERY THING HE DOES ! THIS COWARD AND BULLY DOES THIS SORT OF THING BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE CAN GET AWAY WITH IT ! WHY DO YOU THINK HE KNOWS AND BELIEVES HE CAN GET AWAY WITH IT ?
RE INVESTIGATE AND PUT THIS PATHETIC EXCUSE FOR A SO CALLED MAN IN JAIL WHERE HE BELONGS !
Page 179
Note the children’s disclosure of the father’s actions in telling the little girls NOT to talk to Mrs.Rae or Ginni or the police ! He wouldn’t say why but just got angry , stomped around the house and locked himself in the bedroom and would not come out to feed the hungry children . Note the girls further disclosures that he left them ALONE often and left them HUNGRY often . He doesn’t listen when the children tell him they are sick and yells at them all the time .
  • WHAT A SELF SERVING , SELFISH , BULLY OF A MAN !
  • A TOTAL COWARD WHO THINKS ONLY OF HIMSELF !
  • DOES NOT CARE ABOUT HIS OWN CHILDREN !
  • ONLY CARES ABOUT HIMSELF !
  • USELESS GRUBBY INDIVIDUAL !
  • THINK ABOUT THIS ALL OF YOU SUPPORTERS OUT THERE !
RE INVESTIGATE AND FREE THESE CHILDREN AND THEIR MOTHER !
Page 209
Bronte said ‘ I keep asking Daddy to stop playing with my vagina but he won’t stop ‘ . Isabella heard and says ‘ What you do Bronte is you use your firm voice and you put your hand up like this ( and raised her hand , palm out signalling stop ) and you say NO STOP it Dad
How tragic is it that two young girls have needed to be taught something like this to say to their own father !
RE INVESTIGATE AND FREE THESE WATTER TWINS AND THEIR MOTHER !

SIGN AND SHARE THE PETITION ! Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here)

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

174 total views, no views today

How strong is your stomach ? Cassie’s Diary Part 1 #Leak16 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 16
Cassie’s diary :- 12/09/2011 – 09/10/2012 Part 1
  1. Note this diary is for an 11 month period .
  2. Note this diary is 216 pages in length .  download Diary.pdf
  3. Note I have actually lost count of how many times the two girls mention and disclose to other people the sexual abuse by the father Michael Watter .
  4. Note it is actually VERY sickening to read this diary !
  5. Note how sickening it is to realise how much sexual abuse these poor girls have had from their father Michael Watter .
  6. Note this diary alone should have been enough to put the father Michael Watter in jail for a long time for sexually abusing his own twin daughters  .
  7. Note the different types of abuse , physical , emotional , controlling , verbal — you name it , he was doing it !
  8. Note how most of the time the girls were NOT happy to visit their father !
  9. Note how many times the children were forced to tears just thinking about having to visit their father Michael Watter .
  10. Note how the police officer Rob Garnett abuses and bullies the mother Cassie .
  11. Note how the Child Protection Worker Merle McNulty abuses and bullies Cassie .
  12. Note how quickly Merle McNulty passes information on what she has discussed with the mother Cassie to the father Michael Watter .
  13. Note the total lack of professionalism exhibited by Garnett and McNulty .
  14. NOTE both of these individuals need to be RE INVESTIGATED .
  15. Note how the children say that the father should draw pictures as well and to “ tell the truth  “ .
  16. Note how Michael Watter drives a motor vehicle just so he can intimidate his wife .
  17. Note how this pervert wanted his daughter to “ tickle  “ his penis .
  18. Note how the children mention his “ TICKLING HIS OWN PENIS
  19. Note the children mention the father  “  TICKLING THEIR TUSHKAS/VAGINAS IN MANY DIFFERENT WAYS   “ NOTE PAGE 40 .
  20. Note how throughout this diary that one can tell how caring a mother Cassie actually is .
  21. Note how the father makes a point of telling the girls that police are “ NOT  “ safe people .
  22. Note how scared the children are as a result .
  23. Note how the children disclose the father doing “ naughty  “ things whilst they were on the toilet
  24. Note the reluctance of the girls to go to the father when he came to collect them .
  25. Note how they hid from him when he came to collect them .
  26. Note how the children locked themselves in the bedroom to hide and protect themselves from the father because they refused to PLAY WITH HIS PRIVATE PARTS and so he chased them  .
  27. Note how often the children report their vaginas as being sore .
  28. Note how often the children report their bottoms as being sore .
  29. Note how often the children had nightmares and cried at night time .
NOTE GIRLS MENTIONING DADDY FILMING THEIR VAGINAS ON HIS PHONE AND SAYING IT WAS ON THE COMPUTER AS WELL !!!!!!
09/12/2011 Custody of children given to the father .
  1. Note how the children disclose the father making them share his bed and his “ TICKLING THEIR VAGINAS  “ and “ NIPPLES  “ .
  2. Note the child asked her mother to look at her vagina as the father hurt her there and when asked where pointed to her “ CLITORIS  “
  3. Now the child says that Daddy makes her take her pants off so that “ DADDY CAN PLAY WITH HER VAGINA  “
  4. Note how often the children are upset and crying because they do NOT wish to be with their father .
  5. Note how often the girls complain of having sore vaginas .
  6. Note how the girls mention their “ FATHER’S PENIS STANDING UP “ .
  7. Note how the girls said “ HE HAD A VIDEO OF IT ON HIS PHONE  “ .
  8. Note these disclosures were in front of a third arty who notified Child Safety .
  9. All of this is actually making me sick at the stomach !
  10. Please , ALL of you read this diary .
  11. Please NOTE what a despicable , sickening , abusive , child rapist this man is !!!!
  12. STOP listening to his lies and deception .
RE INVESTIGATE THIS CASE FOR THE CHILDREN’S SAKE .
RE INVESTIGATE THIS CASE FOR THE MOTHER’S SAKE .
RE INVESTIGATE THIS CASE FOR THE GRANDPARENT’S SAKE .
FREE THE WATTER TWIN’S — FOR GOD’S SAKE.
Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here)
WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

235 total views, no views today

What has Jarrod Bleitje done ? The answer is NOTHING ! Is he a paedophile enabler as well ? #Leak13 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 13
Aussie Protective Mom Cathy escapes into hiding with  twin girls .
Help support her and STOP the HUNT !
Call or email Attorney General Jarrod Bleijie .
Call : (07) 5406 3100
Dear Attorney General Bleijie
Safe Kids International has made me aware of a serious injustice being committed within your jurisdiction . A mother who has been trying to protect her children from sexual abuse was not able to due to evidence being dismissed and concealed by the police , judges and safety officers .
Dismissal of evidence of sexual abuse and placement with paternal perpetrators is an international human rights crisis . See : www.RightsForWomenandChildren.org
The Royal Commission has even been petitioned by Bravehearts ( http://www.bravehearts.org.au/ ) and others to include Family Courts in their investigation of the cover up of sexual abuse .
Please do not be a party to this cover up and persecution of this wonderful protective mother and children who have thousands of supporters from all over the world . We are asking you to do the right thing and stop the hunt and dismiss charges against her . You can see some of the mountain of evidence of abuse on SafeKids International FB page www.facebook.com/SafeKidaInternational .  But of course you can get ALL the evidence on your own and see for yourself .
Please help save this mother and her precious children .
Thank you
WikiDetectives
The same pattern is occurring in PM Catherine’s case as has occurred in hundreds of thousands of other cases worldwide ; mothers try and protect their children from abuse and custody is switched to the abusive father through false findings of alienating or coaching by Mom . The mother is placed on supervised visitation to silence them about the abuse and the abuse continues .
The mainstream media has taken the father’s side in this case , as is so often the case when mothers give up on the system and go into hiding . So we present here in social media the mother’s and children’s side .
EVIDENCE FROM FATHERS INTERVIEW
A report by a renowned expert in sexual abuse describes the abuse of KIDS in DANGER . Twins Bronte and Isabella , from the age of two years to the time their protective Mom Catherine successfully escaped family court injustice and went into hiding this April . The girls are now nearly 8 years old .
For a period of 18 months the girls had been disclosing child sexual abuse to at least 13 different people . asking “Please ask Daddy to stop hurting my vagina/tushka “ At times , they described the appearance of their fathers sexually aroused penis and they also exhibited inappropriate sexual behaviours . A child psychologist confirmed the belief that the children had been abused but police ignored HER and the twelve other witnesses .
The child safety officer appears to have missed these interviews with the children . It would appear that she’d already decided that the mother , the director of a paediatric health centre , was “ training “ the children to make false reports against the father for vindictiveness and , as a result of the officer’s opinion , the children were removed from the Family Court and placed in the care of the accused father . The children then had restricted supervised contact with their mother .
Complaints about the father’s behaviour continued subsequent to the interviews . Amazingly police and safety officer concluded that one of the twins DREAMED having sex with her father when she was only two years old and although she cannot remember the dream , this is the explanation they give for all the complaints made over an 18 month period by both girls when they were aged 4-6 . It is significant that the reference to a dream was actually introduced by the police .
Police instructed the mother to dismiss future disclosures of sexual abuse by the children , banned the mother from reading a child protection book that is published by a government funded organisation and recommended by the child safety organisation , told the mother that future allegations of child sexual abuse will not be investigated , threatened the mother that if she examines their genitals when they complain of soreness she will be arrested .
The list of persons receiving reports of abuse include a psychologist , a psychiatrist , an occupational therapist , and five different contact supervisors none of whom appear to have been interviewed . The sexually abusive behaviour was described as : the father rubbing his penis against the vaginas of the 5 year old twins and making them sore ; the father ‘playing ‘with his penis ; his penis went stiff when the child had to play with it ; the father telling the children the game was a secret ; the father telling the children that police cannot be trusted ; the father being angry because the children reported being abused . The children were examined by a GP who made notifications of abuse to the Department . Vaginal cystitis , sores and prolonged vaginal pain were reported .
Police ignored the reports made by professionals such as the psychiatrist and psychologist , a former employee of the Child Safety Department who reported child sex abuse to the authorities and sent a copy of the child’s sexually explicit drawing with the child’s statement that Daddy placed his penis between her legs . The psychiatrist pointed out that ‘ the father had custody of the children for more than 95 % of the time and it seems strange that the Department is pointing the finger at the mother for her children’s abnormal behaviour given that she has had relatively little time with them .
The explanation that the police gave for disclosures of abuse were contradictory and so  unprofessional that Australia’s leading experts on child sexual crimes and discourse analysis were invited to analyse the documentation . As a result of their findings a complaint was lodges with the Queensland Crime and Misconduct Commission which appointed a police inspector to investigate the handling of this case by police .
Local police banned PM Catherine from making further reports , so in April , after years of trying to protect her precious daughters , she fled into hiding . When she is located . she will be imprisoned and the children will be returned to the father . Unless Attorney General Jarrod Bleitjie stops this injustice . Please email or call him and ask him to help protect them .
* We at Safe Kids International support Catherine in her act of civil disobedience .
This LEAK relates to when Jarrod Bleijie was Attorney General for Queensland . GOD FORBID he  entertains that post again ! https://www.facebook.com/jarrod.bleijie/
INCOMPETENT PAEDOPHILE ENABLER !
He is VERY welcome to deny this fact whilst using this page !
He is VERY welcome to tell us all EXACTLY what HE did to have this matter investigated in a correct manner ?
He is VERY welcome to tell us HOW MANY emails he received about this mater !
He is VERY welcome to tell us HOW MANY emails he actually responded to ?
He is VERY welcome to tell us what EXACTLY he is going to do to get this matter RE INVESTIGATED now that the truth is out about the incompetence of the police force and Child Protection Authority !
We KNOW he was alerted to this matter !
Let him deny it here so that we may publish another LEAK !
By way of this LEAK we now AGAIN bring this matter to the current Attorney General Yvette D’Ath ’s attention . https://www.facebook.com/yvetteforredcliffe/
We say AGAIN that we KNOW this matter has previously been brought to D ‘Ath ’s attention and yet we have seen NO results from said information being offered !
WHY ?
More incompetence ?
Do not care ?
Please deny it so we may publish another LEAK !
If any of you are not scared to do so then please share these LEAKS to their facebook pages !

RE INVESTIGATE

 

Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here)
WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

141 total views, no views today

Even the Police Commissioner does not act upon this ? Another paedophile enabler ? #Leak11 #WikiDetectives

 

LEAK 11

This is a letter from the late Professor Freda Briggs to the police commissioner which has NOT been acted upon ! The question needs to be asked WHY ? This letter is NOT from some arbitrary , off the street coward and bully ! This letter is NOT from some uneducated , uncaring , unloving father !
This letter is NOT from some “little “man who sees himself as the be all and end all to the sports community !

My background

  1. This letter however IS from a former child protection officer with the Metropolitan Police attached to Scotland Yard !
  2. A TEACHER of child related protection studies at a tertiary level in 1970
  3. Australia’s most PROMINENT RESEARCHER into child abuse since 1984 .
  4. A Director of early child hood studies for the State College of Victoria in 1975 .
  5. Dean of the Institute of Early Childhood and Family studies 1980 .
  6. Foundation Professor of child development at the University of South Australia 1991 .
  7. Adviser to the Prime Minister on protection of children with disabilities .
  8. Child abuse Consultant to the Minister of Education .
  9. Consultant to NSW , Victoria and South Australia’s Education Departments for writing their child protection curriculum for schools .
  10. Child protection Consultant to Victoria Police .
  11. Researcher and Consultant for Police for 21 years .
  12. Advisor to Avon and Somerset Police for their Child – Safe program .
  13. Has published 21 child protection-related books .
  14. Has received numerous awards including an Honorary Doctorate and an AO in recognition of her work .Dr, \
  15. Freda Briggs expertise is in child abuse/protection and child development .

Questioned by NO ONE , except of course by one COWARDLY , BULLYING , LITTLE MAN whose only claim to fame is the sexual abuse of his children and sexual and physical abuse of his wife !

Professor Briggs states the following :-

Apparent inadequacy of the knowledge and professionalism of Townsville Child Protection Police for handling allegations of child sexual abuse made by very young traumatised children as exhibited in a case which will shortly be before the family court .Apparent inadequacy of the knowledge and professionalism of Child Protection Officers for handling allegations of child sexual abuse made by very young traumatised children as exhibited in a case which will shortly be before the family court .The behaviour of these officers suggests bias against mothers , bullying and the inadequate interviewing of young child sex abuse victims . Alarmingly , the evidence of these officers will probably determine the future safety and well-being of these children .

  1. NOTE lawyers were concerned and asked Professor Briggs to examine and critique the case .
  2. NOTE Professor Briggs states that the following case is ONE OF THE WORST EXAMPLES OF POLICE MISHANDLING SHE HAS EVER COME ACROSS !! why ARE WE not SURPRISED ? DOES THIS FACT ALONE NOT REEK OF CORRUPTION AT A POLICE LEVEL ? Surely this fact alone should prompt a RE INVESTIGATION of this case ? But to date NOTHING !!!! Makes one wonder why ?

Professor Briggs did not name the children as Section 121 which is supposed to protect the identity of the children ALSO protected the identity of the father Michael James Watter which is why he has been able to get away with ALL his LIES and remonstrations UP UNTIL NOW !

The matter was brought to the attention of Senior Police by no less than Hetty Johnston the Director of Bravehearts . Police gave her the impression that the interview DVD’s would be re examined and they would get back to her – NOTHING as of yet ! We have copies of these DVD’s and will be publishing them on You Tube for the whole world to see and comment on . Said DVD’s LEAKED to us by one VERY concerned and HONEST policeman !

Professor Briggs states that when a child discloses sexual abuse the mother is in a dilemma as if she does NOTHING then child protection services can remove the children and put them in foster care .If she turns to the Family Court to seek an order or no contact with the abusive father , the focus is on her as she is at high risk of losing the children as she will be declared mad or bad and therefore the dangerous parent . Professor Briggs states that this happens so frequently that Family Lawyers and Women’s legal Services advise mothers not to mention domestic violence or child abuse in that arena ( McInnes 2013 )

  1. Note how skewed the system is !
  2. Note the need for reform !
  3. Note that NO reform is happening !
  4. Note how Michael Watter through his lawyers has custody of the children for these exact same reasons !
  5. Mothers are more often than not accused of training their children to make false reports !
  6. Note false reports are RARE and are likely to be made equally by fathers and mothers ( 5 % ) as per Associate Professor Thea Brown , Monash University .
  7. Note that alternatively children are removed from their mothers when declared delusional and the mother is then FORCED to undergo a psychiatric examination and even treatment to make them believe their children haven’t been abused ( when they say they have ) ( McInnes 2013 )
  8. Note Professor Briggs says the magistrate removed the children from the care of Cassie because the child safety officer CLAIMED that Cassie when reporting the abuse , said that she would “get “the father ( or words to that effect ) . THERE IS NO RECORD OF THAT SUPPOSED CONVERSATION .

Police ignored court order

Note disks of the interviews were NOT made available until the third day of the trial and in spite of a court order were not handed over until long after which disadvantaged the mother’s lawyers ! WE HAVE COPIES OF THESE INTERVIEWS ! Police disobedience is this not ? A sign of police interference in due process is it not ? And yet NO RE INVESTIGATION ordered !

Police negligence

Note the Townsville police left the children ( 5 years old they were ) unattended in an interview room for a whole hour prior to the interview , HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF THIS HAPPENED TO YOUR CHILDREN ? 5 years old and scared to death ! The camera was on and one of the children expressed a need to go to the toilet . NO ONE attended to her needs

  1. Note that twice the children went looking for help in the corridor and NO ONE was there to help them ! HOW would you feel if that were your children ? VERY PROFESSIONAL THE POLICE WERE ! NOT !
    Note the children could have left the building ! Police negligence AND unprofessional behaviour at ALL levels .
    All of this is indicative of how bad the police were in this case from many and ALL aspects ! Yet NO re investigation ordered !Room for a re investigation ? It hasn’t happened yet has it ? Why not ? Corruption at the highest levels ?
  2. Note , as Freda says , that all of this would have increased the children’s anxiety and would have detrimentally affected their evidence ! A sign of pure NON professionalism exhibited by the police and yet NO re investigation ordered .
  3. NOTE the children informed the police that Michael Watter filmed his sexual activities on his mobile telephone camera !!
  4. Note this appears NOT to have been investigated ! WHY ?

RE INVESTIGATE Why abuse is not substantiated

  1. Note the abuse disclosed by the children was NOT substantiated – why ? See below :-

a. The interviewer did not spend sufficient time developing a rapport with the child . ( The transcripts show that the Queensland Police officer spent no time at all developing a rapport before interviewing them about sexual abuse by their father )
Note total lack of professionalism shown by the police ! Room for re investigation ?

b. The children were not interviewed in a child friendly environment . ( They were interviewed in two police stations and a school office ) .
How pathetic is this ? NO common sense !

c. The interviewer used an authoritarian manner and lacked the empathy and understanding needed to interview traumatised children . ( The police officer is brusque , showed irritation rather than empathy when the children were extremely distressed and did not seem to know how to interview traumatised children ) .
Child friendly ? NOT ! Professional ? NO ! Need for re investigation ? YES !

d. The children did not understand the questions because they were not worded appropriately or the concepts were too complex for their developmental levels . ( The transcript of the meeting shows the interviewer admitting to the mother that one of the children was very distressed and “she either didn’t know what we were wanting to talk about or what we were talking about just wasn’t happening “ . This could have been because the interviewer was not communicating on the children’s wave length and was using inappropriate language in questioning and again begs the question of whether police officers are trained to comprehend and respond appropriately to the complex understandings of traumatised five year olds in relation to sexual abuse by a parent ) .
Professional ? NO ! Re Investigation ? YES !

e. They were too afraid to reveal what happened because they had been threatened by their abuser that terrible things would happen if they did not keep the behaviour secret , such as – they would be taken away and placed in foster care –which actually happened in this case . ( One of the children told trusted adults that Daddy created this secret but police were remiss in not investigating it or asking what would happen if they talked about the secret ) .
Enough said ! Re investigate ? YES !

f. They sensed that their world was falling apart as a result of the disclosures and think that if they retract their allegations , the abuse will stop and their world will be restored . ( Consequent to Child A’s diclosure of sexual abuse , these 5 year old children were placed in foster care for several days without seeing their mother . It is possible and even likely that the retraction was the result of the realisation that her earlier disclosure resulted in being placed in foster care ) .
Well done to the police ! NOT ! To take two traumatised and abused children away from their mother is DISGUSTING ! Professional ? NO ! Re investigation ? YES !

g. The children said their father told them that police could not be trusted . Might this have affected their willingness to talk to the officers and led to the retraction ? Police failed to take this into account .

Well done Michael Watter ! The epitomy of what a good father is all about – telling the kids not to trust the police ! YOU are a dirty piece of rubbish !

HOW MANY TIMES DO WE NEED TO ASK ? RE INVESTIGATE !!

How many times must children have to disclose abuse to be believed. Note the children disclosed sexual abuse by their father to no less than 12 different people over the space of 18 months ! In case ALL you supporters out there do NOT understand this perhaps the question should be asked is this “HOW MANY TIMES OVER A PERIOD OF 18 MONTHS DO YOU THINK THE CHILDREN WERE RAPED ??

Disclosures were to a GP , a psychologist , a therapist , the maternal grandmother and her friends , independent supervisors some of whom made reports to the police or the child safety department !
The childrens MOST FREQUENT REQUEST was for people to to ask their DADDY TO STOP HURTING THEIR VAGINAS !!
The one child described her father’s penis as a big . stiff , hairy sausage that he plays with .
She said he played with it and rubbed it against her vagina until it was sore .
The girls complained frequently of sore genitals and were given frequent medical attention .
The children were often observed acting out inappropriate sexual behaviours !
WHERE do you think they learned them from ? Surely NOT the loving , caring , SEXUALLY abusive Michael Watter ?
Both children TOLD THE POLICE that their father tickled their vaginas and that they had to play with his penis AND one of the children demonstrated his movements and facial expressions ! FOR GOD”S SAKE WHY WERE THEY NOT LISTENED TO ??? WHY WOULD THESE PEOPLE LET THIS CONTINUE TO HAPPEN ??

The two police officers Michelle Faint and Detective Sergeant Dave Miles acknowledged these disclosures were made !
They disregarded this fact !
They had NO supportive evidence to discard this fact !
They took the father’s side They accepted the fathers saying that the children had been coached .
ALL OF THS despite the fact that Cassie had been supervised on 93 occasions !

ALL 93 reports on the supervised meetings by INDEPENDENT contact supervisors reported that the mother’s parenting was EXEMPLARY !
ALL 93 reports said there was nothing to suggest she alienated the children .
ON the contrary as Cassie distracted them EVERY time the children asked that their daddy stop hurting their vaginas . Cassie had been BANNED by the authorities from discussing their complaints !NOTE police explanations were contradictory – The police said the children reported abuse because Cassie provided comfort – What kind of RUBBISH is this ? There was NO evidence of this in the supervisor’s reports on her parental behaviour !
The mother and the children shared a mutually affectionate relationship but when disclosures were made , the mother distracted them .
On the other hand the police condemned Cassie for distracting the children saying she should have questioned them further !
AT THE SAME TIME the police said her questioning them further ( for which there was no evidence in the transcripts ) caused emotional damage , which then resulted in further problematic sexual behaviour and further disclosures !
DON‘T EVEN TRY AND MAKE SENSE OUT OF THIS BECAUSE YOU CANNOT – THERE IS NO SENSE !!

The DVD’s which we will post on You Tube at some stage suggest the poor quality of police interviewing and the fact the children were placed in foster care resulted in the emotional damage to these children !

RE INVESTIGATE !!

Police failed to provide a child – friendly environment

Note three interviews were carried out with the children .
Note four adults were present when the one child was investigated and NO child safety officer .
Note children were interviewed until LATE in the evening .
Note the children were kept until midnight before being placed in foster care accompanied by a male stranger . They were 5 years old – for GOD’S SAKE !
Note they did not see Cassie for several days !
Note even the police admitted that the children were traumatised and distressed in interviews that followed !
Note the police blamed Cassie for the distress !
Note the police took NO blame for the distress .

RE INVESTIGATE !!

Outrageous explanations for the disclosures of child sexual abuse

Note after all the trauma and continued distress caused by the police one of the children said it was just a dream that she imagined when she was 2 years old It doesn’t get much wilder than that does it ?

Note that as amazing and as incredible this may seem , the Queensland Police Child Protection and Child Safety Officers enthusiastically believe and accept this explanation for the abuse !

UNBELIEVABLE AS IT MAY SEEM THE POLICE BELIEVED THAT:-
A TWO YEAR OLD CAN DREAM THAT DADDY RUBS HIS PENIS ON THEIR VAGINAS WITHOUT HAVING EXPERIENCED IT ;
A TWO YEAR OLD CAN DREAM THAT DADDY PLAYS WITH HIS PENIS WITHOUT HAVING EXPERIENCED IT
A TWO YEAR OLD CAN DREAM THAT SHE HAS TO PLAY WITH HIS PENIS AND IT IS STIFF AND LOOKS LIKE A BIG FAT HAIRY SAUSAGE
TWO CHILDREN AGED 4-5 YEARS WILL RE-ENACT ADULT SEXUAL BEHAVIOURS FROM ONE DREAM THAT ONE OF THE CHILDREN DREAMT THREE YEARS EARLIER AND CAN’T EVEN REMEMBER
TWO CHILDREN WAGED 4-5 YEARS WILL REPORT CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE TO AT LEAST 12 DIFFERENT PEOPLE AS A RESULT OF A SINGLE 3 YEAR OLD DREAM SUPPOSEDLY EXPERIENCED BY ONLY ONE OF THEM

Note that in a nutshell , both the police and child safety officers believed and accepted that one dream involving child sexual abuse was experienced by one of the twins at age 2 and this dream was SO powerful that for the previous 18 months it had caused BOTH 5 year olds to seek help from MANY people TO STOP DADDY FROM HURTING THEIR VAGINAS .
Note the officers did not think it suspicious that despite it being such a powerful dream the one child had no memory of what the dream was about .
Note the same officers did not find it suspicious either that a dream experienced by one of the toddlers could affect the other child !
HOW DID THESE OFFICERS QUALIFY AS POLICEMEN?WOMEN ?
PERHAPS THEY WERE USED SPECIFICALLY FOR THEIR STUPIDITY TO ENABLE THE CHILDREN’S ABUSER TO GO FREE !

Note the police accepted that the one child was HIGHLY intelligent and yet it did not occur to them that her retraction could have been the result that living with Dad was preferable to living with foster carers !
Note the officers were biased against the mother !
47 pages of a transcript of the meeting with Cassie proves this !
Note the police not only accepted this rubbish but they also INSTRUCTED Cassie to DISMISS future disclosures of abuse ! To move on ! To bury the issue !
NO WONDER THE MOTHER WAS CONFUSED ON HOW TO REACT !

Note that Professor Freda Briggs said this was OUTRAGEOUS and demonstrated the police’s ignorance of the effects of sexual abuse on the children , and that if the children were being abused , that any denial by the mother , would have caused further long term psychological harm !

Note the officers accepted the dream explanation .
Note they used the story to support Michael Watter .
Note they used the story to blame the mother .
Note they told the father – as is shown oin the DVD which will be shown on YOU TUBE in due course – that the children had not disclosed sexual abuse !
NOTE THE BLATANT LIE !!
So where is the re investigation ?

Note the one child says her father told her it was a dream .
Note her mother said it was NOT .

Note that AFTER returning from foster care that both girls said their father Michael Watter HAD PLAYED WITH THEIR VAGINAS but that it happened a long time ago when they were three !
Note that incrdibly and amazingly the police officers dismissed all of the allegations and indicators of sexual abuse as nothing more than a dream experienced by one of the children some three and a half years prior when she was aged two !

Professor Freda Briggs further states that she would have expected experienced child protection officers to have KNOWN that young children CANNOT imagine or dream about adult sexual behaviour UNLESS they have been traumatised EITHER BY BEING ABUSED OR BY SEEING EXPLICIT , DISTURBING PORNOGRAPHY !

THERE WAS NO SUGGESTION THAT PORNOGRAPHY WAS AN ISSUE AND THE CHILDREN CONSTANTLY STATED THE FATHER MICHAEL WATTER WAS THE ABUSER !

RE INVESTIGATE !!

Police acting outside their role

Note that having read the 47 page transcript of the interview with the mother , Professor Briggs notes that the police took on roles for which they were not qualified !
Note these roles include pseudo psychologist , marriage guidance and parent cousnellor , and even medical expert !
Note Officers David Myles and Michelle Faint , appeared to have acted improperly .
Note said officers reached conclusions and made statements that were far beyond their sphere of competence .
Note that much of what is said to the mother on page 10 did NOT make sense .
Note as per page 4 that Myles acted as a pseudo psychologist !
Note both Myles and Faint had decided that both girls had dreamt about sex with their father when in fact only one of the children had mentioned it !
Note the police offered implausible and incomprehensible explanations for the allegations of child abuse !
Note these explanations would be laughable if the case was not so serious !

Note that when Cassie asked the officers to explain their reasoning the answers were gobbledigook ( Professor Freda Brigg’s words ! )
The officer said it was because the mother “planted the seeds “ and the workings of the brain were spitting these thoughts images back at the girls and saying that they had no memory .
She went on to say “they were too young to get it out – no one has ever been able to get it out of them about the dream .
That being the case , why did they accept this as their explanation for dismissing so many disclosures of sexual abuse ?
The same officers failed to explain how the knowledge exposed by the girls could be accounted for by “planted “ seeds or dreams that the child could not remember

Freda notes that Freud’s theory that girls imagine sex with their fathers was discredited long ago including by La Trobe University Professor Ron and Dr. Juliette Goldman who undertook a massive study of children’s sexual development in the UK , Australia , USA and Sweden .
Findings were published in Show me Yours – Understanding Children’s Sexuality ( Penguin 1986 )

CHILDREN OF 2-5 YEARS OLD CANNOT IMAGINE THE CHANGES THAT OCCUR TO MALE GENITALS WHEN SEXUALLY AROUSED .

THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ACT OUT ADULT SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR FROM A DREAM .
Note that if the mother had trained the children of that age to make false reports , common-sense suggests she would not have told them to say that it only happened once a long time ago when they were three .

Note that the three officers dismissal of the allegations of sexual abuse ( as a result of a dream ) was very concerning as it showed their inadequarte knowledge and lack of professionalism proving their inadequate knowledge of children and sexual abuse .

Note their opinions also likely to influence a judge who may not have been an expert in either child sexual abuse or development .

Note Ms Faint took it upon herself to become a medical practitioner and blamed the girls painful and inflamed genital on a urinary tract infection as a result of poor personal hygiene !
Thank you Doctor Faint !

Cassie is a Director of a paediatric Child Health and Development Centre yet two pages of the transcript are dedicated to lecturing Cassie on how to wipe the çhildren’s bottoms IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT MICHAEL WATTER HAD CUSTODY OF THE CHILDREN and disregarding the fact that Cassie had already been instructed to not get involved in their toileting ! IDIOT policewoman !
Note the child safety officer dismissed the soreness as a rash although the GP found NO rash ! Another IDIOT !

Note the pain and inflammation occurred over several months ! Did the child wear the same knickers all the time ?

The child would have informed the father if the knickers were hurting her although by all appearances the father wouldn’t have given a damn anyway !

THE CHILD DID SAY HOWEVER THAT DADDY’S PENIS HURT HER !
Note that given the amount of times the children complained that Michael Watter would have taken them to the GP or asked Cassie to do so ! Did NOT happen did it Michael !

Note that in dismissing the inflamed , painful genitals of both girls , the interviewer said that all girls of this age have red , sore vaginas which is NOT ONLY UNTRUE BUT IS RIDICULOUS AS WELL !!
Note again she is giving FALSE evidence that she is probably not qualified to give !
Professor Freda Briggs says the officers also took on a counselling role suggesting that the mother should return to her solicitor and seek a 50-50 arrangement because both solicitors would be going for full custody !
Note our earlier comments on aprevious LEAK where it was indicated that the Independent Childrens Lawyer Meade was not so Independent !

RE INVESTIGATE !! >> Police LIED
Note the interviewing officer LIED when telling the parents there had been no disclosure of sexual abuse during the interviews — RE INVESTIGATION WHERE ARE YOU ?
Note it was on record that one of the children had made disclosures of sexual abuse and in the final interview the children said it happened “only once – a long time ago when they were three “ . WHY WOULD THE OFFICERS SAY THAT NO ABUSE HAD OCCURRED ? and yet NO RE INVESTIGATION !

Police give dangerous guarantee

Police repeatedly told Cassie they were the ‘ experts ‘ and gave her a guarantee that the father had NEVER abused the children ( after only two interviews ) . They REPEATEDLY said the children were SAFE .
Note they could and should NEVER have given such a guarantee !
“NO RESPONSIBLE PROFESSIONAL WOULD EVER GIVE A GUARANTEE OF THAT KIND “
Note they could not possibly have known what happened in the past never mind what would happen in the future !
Note their actions jeopardised the children !
Note the father’s contact with the children was NOT supervised !
Note that Cassie’s contact was supervised !

RE INVESTIGATE !!

Police and child safety officers said they will not investigate future allegations of abuse involving these children .

Who made these officers God ?
Who and WHAT gives them the right to tell Cassie this ?

RE INVESTIGATE !!

Police threatened to arrest mother

Note Sgt. David Miles said it was ABHORRENT and DISGRACEFUL that Cassie looked at the genitals of her 5 year old child when she had complained OF PAIN IN THE VAGINAL AREA CAUSED BY DADDY !
What kind of policeman is this man ?
Note he also threatened Cassie that she would be charged with a ‘criminal offence ‘ if it happened again !
MAY WE ASK WHAT THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE CHARGE WOULD BE ?

THE CHILDREN SAY MICHAEL WATTER ABUSED THEM AND THEY THREATEN TO ARREST CASSIE !
BULLYING OF THE WORST KIND !

The officers claim the mother ‘s concerns ( and not Michael Watters behaviour ) led to the children examining their vaginas daily to see if they were red .
There is NO evidence of the children saying this in the transcripts !
NOTE A TOTAL FABRICATION !
Given that they are well hidden ( Dr. Freda Briggs’words ) she doubted that the children could have inspected their own vaginas and there was no suggestion the used a mirror OR examined each other !

RE INVESTIGATE !!
Police threatened to influence DOCS to place the children in long-term foster care .

Note Sgt David Miles THREATENED Cassie that he would influence DoCS to place the children in out of home care ! GOD AGAIN !
WHO does this officer think he is ?
Does he wield that much power and influence ?
Another example od BULLYING !
RE INVESTIGATE !
Police admitted ignoring reports by professionals

Note that Myles confirmed that he had IGNORED the report of a psychologist who thought the report of sexual abuse to be serious enough to report the matter to the authorities !
WHO in the hell does Myles think he is ?
Note the same psychologist sent a copy of the child’s sexually explicit drawing with the child’s statement “ THAT DADDY PLACED HIS PENIS BETWEEN HER LEGS “
Note Cassie told the police the daughter had disclosed sexual abuse to the psychologist .
Note the psychologist allegedly said “Do not leave those children with the father “ .
Note Myles admitted he had not seen the report .
Note Myles dismissed the report as irrelevant !
Note Myles suggested his knowledge was superior !

FOR GOD’S SAKE RE INVESTIGATE

Note that in August 2011 one of the children disclosed sexual abuse by Michael Watter to a GP and an occupational therapist !
Note the GP notified the Department of Child Safety .
Note that TWO MONTHS LATER the same child was taken back to the same GP complaining that her vagina was painful .
Note the police and DCP interviewed her but she did not disclose abuse .
WHY was the GP and occupational therapists words taken as gospel ?
Why traumatise the child again ?
Note Michael Watter had custody of the children 95 % of the time !
Dr. Freda Brigg’s found it to be VERY STRANGE that the Department was pointing the finger at Cassie for the children’s behaviour considering the above fact !
Note that Cassie had ALWAYS had supervised time with the children and was critiqued on her behaviour after each visit !

Note the comment passed “ POLICE APPEAR TO BE GOING TO EXTRAORDINARY LENGTHS TO SUPPORT THE FATHER’S ALLEGATION THAT THE MOTHER IS THE DANGEROUS PARENT AND ONE HAS TO WONDER WHY “

FOR GOD’S SAKE RE INVESTIGATE

Police accepted that the children repeatedly disclosed abuse because no-one responded to them

Note that school child protection programs instruct children to “ tell and keep on telling people you trust “
NO-ONE helped !
Note the mother was banned from discussing it ! WHY ?
Note police contradict themselves again because the officers criticised Cassie for not responding to them !

Note children will persist in making disclosures when they get no positive reponse from an adult !
Note children remain anxious until something is done about it .
We repeat NO-ONE did anything to fix the situation .
Note the children complained for 18 months and yet it appears MICHAEL WATTER never discussed these matters with the children and the police did NOT ask WHY !
Note this leaves the question of “ WHY WOULDN’T AN ACCUSED PARENT DISCUSS CHILDREN’S ALLEGATIONS IF HE WAS INNOCENT ? WOULDN’T HE WANT TO KNOW HOW THE CHILDREN ACQUIRED THIS INFORMATION ? “

FOR GOD’S SAKE RE INVESTIGATE

Professor Freda Briggs says “ The research shows that when children of this age make reports of abuse , their evidence is reliable and they only retract when threatened and they realise that their statements are leading to changes to their world that they can’t handle “

Note International literature on child protection instructs adult recipients of such disclosures to respond on the lines of :-
THANK YOU FOR TELLING ME’; I BELIEVE YOU
YOU HAVE DONE THE RIGHT THING BY TELLING ME ; IT SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED .
ADULTS KNOW THAT THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO THIS TO CHILDREN
THIS CAN’T BE KEPT SECRET…THERE IS A SPECIAL PERSON WHO HELPS CHILDREN WHEN THIS HAPPENS , I.E. A SOCIAL WORKER OR POLICE
Note THIS NEVER HAPPENED !

NOTE THAT WITH NO RESPONSE FROM ADULTS TO STOP THE SEXUAL ABUSE THAT MORE PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM WOULD HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CHILDREN BY THE ABUSER .

Professor Freda Briggs stated “ It is therefore even more alarming that the two police officers subsequently ordered the mother to ignore further disclosures of abuse , andworse , instruct them to tell , that what they are reporting was just a dream “
HOW DARE THESE POLICEMEN ACT THIS WAY !

RE INVESTIGATE !!

Bullying by police and child safety officers

The transcript of the meeting between the two police and DoCS officers with the mother ( September 2012.47 pages ) gives insights into their bullying behaviour . The interviewer began by saying that they were about to be brutally honest , They were certainly brutal but not honest . They banned the mother from having a support person present , explaining that they wanted her to listen . Obviously , accurate listening is improved when there is another person present because the targeted person can check later with the witness as to whether she understood correctly . Having the mother alone with three opponents enabled them to harangue and bully her without there being any independent witness .The transcript shows they had her in tears several times . Police interpreted the mother’s normal anxiety as a character deficit . Given what she was hearing and what the children were doing I suggest that any caring mother would have been anxious . She had no control over their safety when they were with their primary carer .

Although the children’s allegations involve the father , the police focus is entirely on the mother . It appears that they were desperately trying to prove that she trained the children to make false reports to regain residence . What comes through consistently is the mother is “ damned if she does and she is damned if she doesn’t “ . The Sgt ( who wasn’t even present during the interviews with the children but appears to be there to support his junior officer ) criticised her for giving the children a “ happy time – it’s fantastic …… your kids see your time as fun because you always do fun things and that’s great “. He then blamed the mother for the fact that the children describe their father as boring . They said he spends a great deal of time on his computer .

Both officers said repeatedly that the children are safe with their father . Contradicting what the children had said .

While advising the father to teach protective behaviours , the officers again acted outside their policing role by arbitrarily banning the children from seeing the protective behaviours book written for p[re-school children entitled “Everyone’s got a bottom “ . This little book was published by Family Planning Queensland and , paradoxically , is recommended by Queensland’s Child Safety Department and can be found in kindergartens nationwide . This book is sensitively written and illustrated and it could never have been responsible for the children’s alleged description of their father masturbating , rubbing his penis on their vaginas and hurting them . It most certainly would not have caused any 2 year old child to dream about sexual crimes .
It is interesting that Sgt David Miles expresses expert opinion and bullies the mother despite not being present when the children were interviewed .

Why do you think the officers banned the mother from having a support person ?
Or was it Only Myles who banned her from having a support person ?
Interesting don’t you think ?
Or are you a blind follower of Michael Watter who can read nothing into all of this ?
Do you leave YOUR children unattended in his company ?
Can you see the book being responsible for Michael Watter rubbing his penis on his OWN daughters vaginas ?
Can you see the book being responsible for the father masturbating in the company of his OWN daughters ?

RE INVESTIGATE

Evidence of inappropriate questioning of young children .

Please read this section of Professor Freda Briggs’ letter and ask your self the following questions :-

WHY did Michelle Faint not bother to obtain the children’s trust ?
WHY did she not give the child a voice ?
WHY did she clearly indicate to the child that she was NOT believed ?
Why would Michelle Faints questions be worded in such a way as to confuse the young girl ?
Why would she deny her the capacity to respond and increase her anxiety ?
WHY would the officers NOT make the children feel comfortable and try to gain their trust and confidence ?
WHY would they leave two very young children ALONE in the room for one hour before the interview ?
WHY would the officer show irritation when the child cried in particular when it was the officer who caused the child to cry ?
WHY would the officer ask inappropriate questions of a 5 year old ?
WHY would the officers make no effort to get to know the children ?
WHY would the officers NOT make them comfortable in the three different venues ?
WHY were the children NOT even offered drinks during the lengthy interviews ?

WHY am I even asking these questions ?
WHY is there no re investigation ?

WHY is officer Michelle Faint ONLY interested in finding evidence to support ONLY her assumptions ?
WHY did Faint NOT investigate the statements made prior to the foster care ?
WHY does Faint refuse to accept the child’s testimony when the Queensland Criminal Law ( Sexual Offence ) Act 1978 and the Criminal Code 632 specifically prohibits any judicial suggestion that a class of persons ( such as the children ) are unreliable witnesses ?
IN OTHER WORDS THE JUDGE WOULD HAVE TO GIVE A CUSTOM MADE DIRECTION TO THE OFFICER REGARDING THE EVIDENCE OF THAT PARTICULAR WITNESS .
WHY would Faint NOT approach this matter in the correct manner as this appears to be the case ?
WHY did the officers fail to cater for the developmental age of the children , in particular their thinking and communications , given that the questions asked were OFTEN inappropriate ?
WHY did the officers NOT ask essential questions which would have revealed exactly what happened ?

1. At the outset it was noted that Child A was breathing quickly , distressed and close to tears . The interviewer began questioning her immediately about her vagina and repeated this questioning , contrary to best practice .

2. The interviewer said that it was her job to “ help kids to stay happy , well and safe “ . Child A is described by police as very intelligent and she would have recognised the hypocrisy given that revealing what her father did at the previous interview led to both girls being placed in foster care . This may have made them safe but certainly not happy as shown by the change in their demeanour and appearance from being confident and talkative at the first interview to being extremely distressed and traumatised at subsequent interviews .

3. There was a lack of eye to eye contact . The interviewer looked down at the questions on her pad and wrote notes . Why is this necessary when interviews are recorded ?

4. The interviewer reminded Child A that on the previous Saturday “ You told me about what happened with Dad — so tell me everything you can about that time ( Tell me everything about that time is not an appropriate instruction for a 5 year old . )

5. The child said she was having a rest when Daddy “ snuck in “ . She said “ he pulled the covers off me “ . The interviewer then asked her to demonstrate how , adding the word “ Pretend “ . Given that no blanket was available the child tried to demonstrate using her arm saying “ He just grabbed it and pulled it off “ .

6. The officer eventually noted that Child A was distressed , but , contrary to best practice , she continued questioning her . Her manner could be described as brusque and authoritarian . She said that the child could tell her anything that upsets her and , several times , guaranteed that she could not get into trouble for talking to the police . This officer was in no position to make such a promise . An intelligent child was likely to have realised that the officer could not be trusted given ( a ) her earlier disclosure led to her father being very angry with her for exposing abuse and ( b ) that her disclosure at the previous interview led to the girls being placed in foster care .

7. The child said that the father was going to tickle her ( on her vagina ) but Child B stopped him . Three times in succession the interviewer asked “ then what happened ? “ to which she learned that Dad watched TV , read another book then wrote something . The interviewer said “ Huh , huh , huh “ each time .

8. Child A wept . The officer asked brusquely “ what are the tears for ? “ Eventually the child said she missed her Mum . She hadn’t seen her for several days, What about Dad Child A “ Sometimes “ Interviewer “ How come you miss your Mum more than your Dad “ Note ( Not a suitable question for the average 5 year old . Most would not be able to analyse and articulate feelings ) .Interviewer “ Yell me how you feel about Dad / “ ( Not an appropriate question as above) Child A “ He’s a bit…?? and sometimes he’s not . ( Not what ? The officer did not ask what she meant ) .

9. The interviewer asked : “ On Saturday you said that Dad pulled down the blankets and tickled your vagina . Did that really happen ? You told me that you were lying down – he took the blanket off – lifted up your shorts and nickers . Did that happen ? Given that there were 5 components to this question , it was clearly inappropriate for the child’s stage of development .

As in the previous interview , the officer never asked if the Dad was sitting or lying on the bed or standing when this happened or what he did when he was finished… bearing in mind that a witness had seen the children re-enacting sexual activity in the bath with one child on top of the other . If he ejaculated , he would probably have wiped the child and himself but no questions were asked that might lead to this information . Importantly the child did not say that her disclosure was untrue but police assumed that it was .
She remained silent then very slightly shook her head which the interviewer interpreted as retracting the information previously given .

10. The officer is supporting the father’s claim that the mother trained the children to make false reports when she said :
“ Who told you about Dad tickling your vagina “ . Child A replied “ I guess I must have had a dream about it “ . She went on to say that the dream occurred when she was two years old but she couldn’t remember it . There was obviously a strong possibility that the father told her to say that it was just a dream but that was not investigated . It is important to note that although the children disclosed sexual offences over an 18 month period , a dream was only used to dismiss the allegations of after they had been placed in foster care and she could have rationalised that life with Dad was preferable to life with strangers . It is important to note that “
1. children of 2 do not dream about sex with adults unless they have been traumatised by sexual abuse or by over – exposure to pornography ( which also constitutes abuse ) . Ther has never been any suggestion that pornography is involved ; only the father has been accused by both girls .
2. the police interviewer failed to ask who told her to say that she only dreamt it and her mother said she did not .
3. the interviewer asked “ How do you dream ? “ ( clearly an inappropriate question for a child of five . ) The child responded that she didn’t know where the dreams came from .
4. The interviewer : Has Daddy tickled you or touched your vagina ? “ Child A replied “ Only … “ ( she did not finish her response and the officer was remiss in not allowing/encouraging her to complete the sentence . )
5. The interviewer reminded the child that she previously said that her that her Daddy took off his pants and got his penis and moved it on her “ tushka “ . Child A said it was a dream .
The interviewer : “Was that another dream or the same dream ? .. How did you come to dream like that …and who had you been talking to ? “ ( 3 questions in one and a question as to “how “ you dream are again inappropriate for a 5 year old ) . Child A responded that she talked to her teddy .
6. The interviewer said she knew that the child had told Mrs. Jinny and Aunty Cherie that she wanted to talk to Mum and she said “ Mummy , his penis stands up and he wants me to tickle it “ . The officer asked who “ he “ was and the child replied “Daddy “ , and , as an afterthought , added that it was in the same dream .
7. The interviewer asked “ why did you have bad dreams “ ? ( at age 5 a child could not know why she dreams ) . Child A replied that before you dream you get imagining .
8. The interviewer : “ On Saturday you described Daddy’s penis . When do you see it ? “ Child A replied “ When he has a shower “ . The officer did not question this further although the implication must be that she sees Daddy sexually aroused in the shower .
9. The interviewer questions Child A about the book Everyone’s got a bottom published by Queensland Family Planning and recommended by the Child Safety Dept. Child A said that she read it when she was two .

Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here)

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

 

131 total views, no views today

WHY has the father never been assessed ? Smells of corruption ? #Leak8 #WikiDetectives

LEAK 8
Report/Affidavit . Justine Goddard . Psychologist .
This report was carried out whilst Michael Watter had custody of the twin girls .
At this time Cassie had limited access to the children following her initiation of allegations of child abuse by the father .Cassie’s credibility called into question as a result of her denial that she had been raped by her brother . Cassie’s insight also questioned regarding the effect of her personal history possibly influencing her hyper vigilant state in regards to allegations of sexual abuse to her own children .
  1. Note Cassie highly motivated to  complete process .
  2. Note Cassie proactive and eager to please .
  3. Note Cassie understandably , initially , guarded and apprehensive .
  4. Note Cassie soon became candid and open .
  5. Normal intelligence .
  6. Cassie expressed herself clearly and coherently .
  7. Logical in discussion .
  8. NO EVIDENCE of psychotic thought or behaviour .
  9. Note Cassie threatened by Michael Watter
  10. Note continuous verbal abuse by Michal Watter .
  11. Note forced sex by Michael Watter – RAPE is it not ? Very indicative of what a sweet , loving caring father and husband that Michael Watter puts himself out to be !!
  12. Note Cassie scared of Michael Watter .
  13. Note the children OFTEN tried to intercede when the parents were fighting .
  14. Note Cassie continually tried to protect her children .
  15. Note Cassie tried to protect her parents from the fact that her own brother raped her . Note how Michael Watter twists this to enable him to get custody of the children .
  16. Note Cassie’s continual concern for the well being of her children .
  17. Note Michael ONLY concerned about self !
  18. Note Cassie receptive to ALL and ANY professional recommendations to assist in her dealing with the issues at hand . Don’t see ANYTHING of this where Michael Watter is concerned do you ? Mr Perfect !
Results of the Personality Assessment Inventory ( PAI )
The PAI is a self administered questionnaire consisting of 22 scales . These scales measure several clinical features relating to personality characteristics and psychological disorders as well as information relating to treatment issues and interpersonal styles . There are also validity and reliability scales . Cassie Watter’s responses indicated the following —
  1. Note there was NO attempt by Cassie to distort profile .
  2. Note that NO evidence to suggest Cassie was motivated to portray herself in a more negative or pathological light than the clinical picture would warrant .
  3. Note Cassie still feels trying to protect her parents was the correct thing to do .
  4. Note Cassie is NOT a person to seek confrontation or conflict and shunned controversy .
  5. Note Cassie valued harmonious relationship .
  6. There are other results in this report which you the reader may wish to consider so PLEASE read the report in it’s entirety .
Results of the inventory of altered self-capacities ( IASC )
  1. Note Cassie’s dominant score was “Susceptibility to influence “ which indicates she was prone to accept other’s statements and assertions and as a result to follow directions of others without sufficient self consideration .
  2. Note Cassie easily influenced by other’s opinions .
  3. Two other scores were in relation to regulation and control of affect , or one’s emotional experience .
  4. Note Cassie’s results indicate  she has problems in inhibiting the expression of strong emotions . is subject to mood swings and has a relative inability to move out of dysphoric states without externalisation ( e.g. aggression , self injury ) or avoidance ( dissociation , substance abuse ) .
  5. Note Cassie’s results in line with the “clinical “ impression over 4 months of consultations .
  6. Note that in relation to susceptibilty to influence Cassie it is the psychologists impression that Cassie employs an unsophisticated style of thinking that is not characteristic with her own critically evaluating  her own decision making style .
  7. In relation to Affect Control presents as with MOST of the profile provided by IASC – in other words NOT PERFECT unlike Michael Watter .
  8. PLEASE read report for more information .
Results of Trauma Symptoms Inventory ( TSI )
Note responses are interpretable and valid . All of the scales on her profile NOT clinically significant .
Discussion
  1. Note that there is NO evidence Cassie has any underlying pathological or psychological disorders .
  2. Note there is NO evidence of underlying hypervigilant thoughts or behaviours .
  3. Note that in spite of Michael Watter being an aggressive person Cassie was still able to highlight the positives of his parenting .
  4. Psychologist states that there is NO evidence to suggest Cassie has a grudge to bear ( my words please read the summary ) .
  5. Clinical impressions and history provides a picture of Cassie as having average intelligence acting in the children’s best interest .
  6. Cassie identifies “with the role of protector “ as part of her own “Moral “compass  which guides her behaviour where her loved ones are concerned .
  7. This has guided her when protecting her parents from the information about her brother .
  8. Cassie ACCEPTS her denial about her brother’s rape in court has contributed to the fact that it was decided that separation from her children was in their best interests . — one wonders whether the continued RAPE of these children by the father was taken into consideration ? The answer is NO or WHY would they be with the paedophile father ?
  9. Note Cassie still not confident on how to behave should the children disclose again !  Mixed signals and conversations from the authorities have contributed to this situatiuon ( my words )
Summary and Conclusions
  1. Note Cassie’s behaviour not likely to be motivated by hypervigilance due to unresolved issues from her own experience of childhood abuse .
  2. Note more likely Cassie’s behaviour  determined by “how a good mother would act “ and therefore taking action following the sexual abuse disclosures and lying in court to protect her parents was justified .
  3. Note there is NO clinical evidence to suggest Cassie is motivated to defame Michael Watter due to underlying pschopathology , such as obsessional or delusional beliefs .
  4. Note Cassie Watter able to separate her personal position towards Michael Watter .
  5. Note Cassie still able to point out “positive “ features of Michael Watter as a parent – note to self – there is NOTHING positive about the rape of a child !!
  6. Note that in spite of the disclosures of child sexual abuse by the children , Cassie suggested the appointment of a court appointed psychologist as a neutral support for the children would assist and was happy to participate in procedures and guidelines by the court should there be any further disclosures of sexual abuse .
  7. Note that IF these children were believed in the first place and a NORMAL and UNBIASED investigation had taken place there would be NO need for Cassie to agree or follow any guidelines given by the court as the children would have been removed from the paedophile father and NO more child sexual abuse or rape would have continued to occur !! Not so ?
  8. The psychologist notes that Cassie is highly motivated to have further access to her children . — and WHY wouldn’t she be knowing that the father continues to sexually abuse them !
  9. Note the rest of the report please .
Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here)
WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

100 total views, no views today

#FreeMissingWatterTwins – Press Statement 1

Release from an anonymous source  to #WikiDetectives. Please see our comments listed below . It marks the 3rd anniversary of the disappearance of Cassie Watter and her two daughters Isabella and Bronte .The maternal grandparents Arthur and Heather Doubleday have kept an interest in this matter and have via my office requested constant updates from the Queensland Police Service in regards to the ongoing investigations .

The grandparents remain hopeful that their daughter and granddaughters will be located safe and well . They also expect that once the children are located they will be interviewed by properly trained investigators regarding allegations made to the authorities prior to their disappearance .

This comes on the admission by the Queensland Police Service that previous interviews were not conducted in accordance to the Queensland Police Service requirements , to the extent that two senior offices were required to undergo re-training

The poor original interviews of the children may have led to a miscarriage of justice or at least to circumstances where the courts were not provided with the true facts of this case

This case highlights the plight of victims of child abuse and domestic violence and the under resourced services such as police , child safety and the court system , whether it be the State courts or in this case the Commonwealth family courts who deal with such matters .

The maternal grandparents have not and will not voice their versions of events regarding this matter , for a number of reasons , but mostly because they cannot due to being subject to gag orders of the Family Court of Australia .

However , the maternal grandparents remain committed to their daughter and granddaughters , nothing will change that commitment . Today is designed to keep up public awareness in this case , to highlight the plight of victims of domestic violence and child abuse . So, in closing , the grandparents would ask the public to report any sightings to authorities , but also in addition they encourage everyone to report any acts of domestic violence and/or incidents of child abuse .

‘ Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation ‘

We as Wiki Detectives Pty Ltd are not governed by the vagaries and corruption that in this case is evident in the family court and amongst the police involved .

The grandparents are NOT permitted to say that the father Michael Watter has raped his twin daughters even though that very fact has been disclosed to NUMEROUS individuals . No interviews of these individuals have been carried out .

This fact alone is evidence of corruption and needs to be dealt with . The judge that allowed custody of the twin daughters to the paedophile father Michael Watter did NOTHING to make sure these people were interviewed and the evidence thereto used in making the decisions that were made .

A re-investigation in this case is essential and until this happens it is evident that the mother and children will remain in hiding to protect the children from further rape and abuse .

All of this now lies at the feet of the Attorney General ( who is well aware of this case ) who has received much correspondence in relation thereto and who is the person that needs to ORDER a re-investigation . The corruption amongst the police and judiciary needs to be dealt with and anyone involved in the cover ups need to be jailed . The Attorney General needs to stop protecting this paedophile .

282 total views, no views today

You , the father , are a PIG ! A little man ! A bully ! A coward ! #Leak4 #WikiDetectives

 

 

LEAK 4

This is one of the more important LEAKS as per information presented to the High Court outlining all the various disclosures by the twins to their mother and a number of different people .

Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here)

SO FAR all that has been disclosed on specific days does not even begin to cover how often the abuse has been carried out on the poor twins by their paedophile father Michael Watter . Michael Watter caught masturbating whilst watching the children ! Caught by the mother .

Bronte discloses to the mother that the father Michael Watter made her vagina painful by rubbing it !

Bronte disclosed to LUCY DALL ‘ ALBA the occupational therapist that Michael Watter rubbed her vagina through her pyjamas !

Isabella lay on Bronte in the bath rubbing her vagina with her tummy saying they were daddy Michael Watters “funny hugs “ . Further said that the hair on his tummy tickled their “tooshka“ (vagina ) . She pointed to the place above her vagina and said that was where the father Michael Watter’s hair was and went on to say that the father tickled himself in the groin area further showing a motion consistent with masturbating !

Bronte disclosed the bath game was the same as the bed game

Isabella told Cassie that the father Michael Watter had asked her to keep a bad secret ( Bronte agreed and confirmed this ) which was about playing with her Tooshka . Also told Cassie there was a good secret and that he loved her and then Bronte disclosed that a bad secret was when Daddy tickled their Tooshkas !

Isabella disclosed to Patricia Plaistead and the mother , asking that they ask the father Michael Watter , to PLEASE STOP playing with her private parts when he collects her !

Isabella disclosed to Carolyn Seri the psychiatrist by drawing a picture of Isabella and her father with genitals and said he ( Michael Watter ) rubs her down there with his genitals and that it was just pretend !

Isabella is upset one day and does not want to go with Michael Watter as he had made up the bed and bath game where he tickles her vagina with his penis and tummy and also tickles his own penis . He asked her to do the same to him and she said no but tickled him anyway .

Bronte disclosed to Christine Young that Daddy tickled her on the front of her bottom whilst she was not wearing pants —called him “naughty Daddy “

Isabella disclosed again to Cassie that Michael told the truth about tickling their ( the twins ) vaginas and that he was crazy and shouldn’t tickle them .

Bronte told Cassie that the father ( Michael Watter ) has three hands and that he use two hands to tickle the girls when lying next to him and then tickles himself on his other hand !

Bronte again disclosed to Christine that Michael tickled them on their vaginas although Michael said he would not touch their private parts anymore .

Bronte disclosed to Christine thatthe father Michael Watter told them ( the twins ) that he would get into big trouble if the girls told anyone all the naughty things he had done . Cassie asked what the naughty things were and was told by Bronte that Michael tickled their Tooshkas on lots of different days in bed or on the couch and the toilet . Isabella said he would take the covers off her to enable him to tickle her vagina .

Bronte drew a picture of herself sitting on the toilet with Michael next to her and said Michael tickled her Tooshka whilst on the toilet . Cassie asked her if he was just wiping her bottom to which she responded that sometimes he did but sometimes he did naughty stuff !

Isabella asked the mother to write a story about what had been said which Cassie did and brought up the fact that she ( Isabella ) had asked him to stop tickling and he did not but when he did he then started tickling Bronte’s vagina . They asked him to stop and he never did according to them and then he did stop . Cassie asked them which of this story was the truth and they said some was truth and some was tricking . Cassie suggested they go through the story and mark which was the truth and which was the tricking and the only part of the story that was reflected as the tricking was the part about the father never doing it again !

Bronte disclosed to Cassie that the father did not know what a vagina was and when asked what she meant said that Daddy had said he was sorry for tickling their private parts upon which Bronte told him he meant vagina . Bronte then said she was joking that Michael did not know what a vagina was .

Bronte and Isabella said that the father had told them he was sorry for tickling their Tooshkas .

They called their father a “Baboon tickling tooshka super hero “ because he is a baboon and he tickles their tooshkas on the couch and bed and Isabella said that is what a baboon tickling tooshka super hero does !

Bronte was crying and disclosed to the mother her vagina and bottom were sore and when the mother called the grandmother , Heather Doubleday , further disclosed that Isabella refused to play with Michael’s private parts . Bronte locked herself and Isabella in the bedroom to be safe from Michael . She further stated that they were playing the tickling tooshka game and that when they did that the father was no longer angry and laughed and laughed !

Isabella disclosed to Cassie on a visit to relationships Australia that Daddy still played with their private parts .

Bronte disclosed to Cassie that the father had broken his promises that he would not play with their tooshka again as he was still playing with it !

Isabella stated “Daddy tickled my vagina again today Mum “ Said he had made Bronte go rest in her room and then took her to his room and then tickled her under the arms , on her nipples and then her tummy and vagina . She asked him to stop but he didn’t .

He asked her to play with his penis and she said no so he played with it himself . Isabella ended the conversation by saying she was telling the truth and then soiled her swimmers !!

Cassie took her to the bathroom to clean her up and Isabella showed her where her vagina was sore and where her father had hurt her and pointed to her clitoris . The area around the clitoris was reddish .

Isabella told her mother AGAIN that the father makes her take her pants off so that he can play with her vagina . Said he makes her do it when Bronte is in the other room and she wasn’t to tell Daddy as he would get angry with her .

Isabella told Cassie that her father still makes her go to his bedroom and could she please stay at home . Said he doesn’t rub her tooshka any more but instead rubs the clothes and showed her mother by rubbing her vagina through her shorts . She said he tries to get in the middle but cannot !

Isabella disclosed that Michael Watter had made her tooshkla sore again and she soiled her swimmers again . In the bathroom she showed her mother where he hurt her and the vagina was red and raw ! When Cassie asked if she could put cream on it she said know as she was scared as Michael would know and would be angry . Bronte lay down as well and pointed to her clitoris and said “this is where he plays with me and it doesn’t hurt see “

Bronte disclosed to the mother and Desiree Taylor that daddy had said not to talk to the police because they were not her friends and Isabella said that when Daddy played with her private parts his would stand up ! She said he had a video of it on his phone .

At school Isabella had said one of her wishes had come true and that Daddy no longer played with her vagina .

Bronte told mother that Isabella’s wish did not come trie as Dady still played with their vaginas .

Isabella told her mother that Michael still rubs  her vagina when she is in bed with him .

Isabella told the mother and Rae Greaves ( supervisor ) that Daddy used to play with hers and Bronte’s vaginas but did not any longer . Rae Greaves asked Isabella again if this was correct and she said YES using sign language .

Isabella disclosed to the mother and Virginia Hall (supervisor) that when she played with Daddy’s penis that it stands up and is scary !

Isabella stated in front of Rae Greaves ( supervisor )that Daddy still played with her vagina and that if she told he gets very angry with her .

Isabella stated to Cassie and Rae Greaves that Daddy will still not tell the truth and that he still plays the rude game and that he told them to say it was Cassie but that was a lie !

Bronte told Virginia Hall and Cassie that they had to play with Daddy’s private parts again .

Isabella said to Virginia and Cassie that Bronte still goes to Daddy’s room to play with his private parts .

Bronte says she slept in Daddy’s room again and that he played with her vagina .

Bronte told her mother that Daddy said she is not allowed to tell anyone about her father playing with her vagina .

So Michael Watter – it is interesting that you say the children have been coached into what to say !

Cassie must have spent the previous four years 24 hours a day coaching these poor children because they are just so good and make such superb actresses without any trip ups whatsoever – what do you think Michael ?

Interesting that you have the temerity to even deny these facts of child abuse on both your daughters !

Interesting that only ONE supervisor out of all the people that the children disclosed to has ever been interviewed !

Do you think this perhaps reeks of a cover up ? You disgusting , filthy pervert !

You are the lowest of the low !

You have gotten away with all your lies up until now . The tide has turned and you will no longer get away with it !

Until we came along you thought you had it made !

We will NOT stop until the truth is out !

We will not stop until there has been a re-investigation of the facts surrounding this case !

None of these disclosures have been made public up until now . They would have remained hidden under the secrecy of the corrupt family court so your corrupt judges , lawyers , policemen and parliamentarians could say what they wanted and get away with it !

Sad and tragic for you that we have so many LEAKS to publish which will bring the truth into the public arena !

You are NO LONGER safe with your lies and bravado !

The whole world KNOWS that you are a paedophile and if we have missed anyone out there , rest assured that they will soon be included amongst those who know !

Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here)

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

234 total views, no views today

The Hon. Jo-ann Miller MP – paedophile enabler ? #Leak2 #WikiDetectives

This information “ LEAKED “ to us by a policeman !

No cover up is there !!!!

Really innocent is he not !!!!

All made up by the mother !!!!

No ways Michael Watter is a paedophile !!!!

The Hon Jo-ann Miller MP

Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Servies

And minister for Corrective Services

GPO Box 15195, City East. QLD. 4002

Dear Minister Miller

Re: The abuse of Cassie Watter and twin daughters Bronte and Isabella Watter).

In 2009 and 2011 my husband, Ridley, and I stayed with friends Arthur and Heather Doubleday at their home in Rasmussen, Townsville. Whilst there, we met their daughter Cassie Watter and her twin daughters Bronte and Isabella whose whereabouts are being sought by police. Throughout our stay, we interacted with Cassie and her children. The girls love for their mother Cassie was very precious to observe as they were always very happy to have her (Cassie) to themselves, always jumping, hugging and kissing her.

In 2011 Cassie and her daughters moved into her parents’ home while we were there. Cassie told us that she had moved there to protect her children from the risk of sexual assault, because she had seen Michael in the bed of one of her twins masturbating himself while looking at one of his daughters. His attention was only drawn to Cassie at the door of the bedroom when one of the children said “Hello Mummy”. Michael sat up immediately and just stared angrily at Cassie daring her to say something. Cassie took the girls out of the room to have breakfast. Cassie was very tearful and upset when telling us about this incident.

We appreciate that some of what my husband and I heard is hearsay but I can attest to the following:-

1. Sometime between 21/08/2011 and 04/09/2011, Cassie asked me to accompany her, Bronte and Isabella to Stuart Police Station, Townsville because the children were going to be interviewed. Cassie only told me “There were concerns to be sorted out”.

Bronte was the only girl interviewed on that day.

2. The next day, Cassie received a phone call from police saying that the case was closed. I rang Detective Rob Garnett, one of the interviewing officers requesting that the case be investigated further and was told “It is just a very bitter custodial battle. But I can tell you the father is a very nasty character.”

3. On the evening of 6th September 2011 I was at the Doubleday’s home with Cassie and the girls and recall that Isabella had been ill and her father, Michael Watter had failed to bring her antibiotic medication from the Cathedral Pre-Prep centre which the girls attended. It was not until after dinner that Isabella said to her mother, “Daddy knows he left my medicine behind but he wouldn’t go back to get it” to which Cassie replied “Never mind, we can get some more, and if not, I’ll go to the school early in the morning and pick it up.”

Shortly after this, Cassie asked me to accompany her and the children to the medical centre. Bronte was obviously had a fever and a bright red rash on most of her body. The GP diagnosed a viral illness. We then went to the pharmacy for medication. Isabella asked if we could get her medicine too and repeated that she had asked her father to return to school to get it for her. Bronte and Isabella were both ill and did not attend school the next day.

4. On Monday 12th September 2011, I assisted Cassie to bath the children. They had fun pretending to sell us the toy animals in the bath. When all the toys were ‘sold’, Bronte laid on her back with her legs apart and Isabella lay on top of her sliding up and down in a sexual fashion. Cassie asked, “What are you doing?” And they said “The same as last night”. She then said “Where did you get that from?” And they said “Daddy does it—it is our funny hugs” and they both laughed. Cassie then redirected their play to the bath toys.

5. On Friday 30th September 2011, sometime early in the afternoon, Cassie said that Isabella would like to speak to me about her fear of visiting her daddy. I talked to Isabella and she said she wanted her mother to tell me what was wrong. When asked if it was about staying the night with daddy, she said “Yes” but did not give any reason. Later, Cassie asked Isabella (as she was still very withdrawn), if she would like to speak to another ‘safe person’. She named Storm Boswell, who was their former baby sitter, then a school teacher. She wasn’t available and Carolyn Seri, the girls’ psychologist was her second choice. We left a message on her Voicemail and she rang later. Isabella was happy to talk to her, but did not mention her concerns about visiting her father.

On that same day, shortly before Michael was due to collect the girl, Isabella. said “Can you please talk to daddy about playing with my private parts?” Both Cassie and I said “Pardon?” and Isabella repeated the question. Cassie said she would. Cassie asked my husband and I to be with her and her daughters when Michael arrived to take them on an access visit. This access visit was requested with less than the required 24 hour notice..

Michael Watter did not acknowledge anyone. Cassie told Michael that Isabella needed to tell him something, so she said to Isabella “Tell daddy what you told me last night and this morning.” Isabella mumbled a sentence and clung to Cassie, refusing to talk or look at her father. Cassie asked, “Have you touched the girls’ private parts? Bronte and Isabella have said that you have and that it was a secret.” He just ducked his head, grunted and laughed.

Michael responded that Bronte and Isabella “are only little girls and they would say anything”. Cassie said that she now knew why they were having nightmares relating to their visits. Cassie also described their behaviour in the bath and their assurance that this is what daddy did. I said that I had witnessed it. Girls of that age cannot imagine adult sexual misbehaviour.

After this confrontation Michael said “So what happens from here?” Cassie said that Bronte and Isabella were seeing a child psychologist and he interrupted and said “I will call the Department of Child Safety to lodge a grievance and request them to speak to both of us.” Michael already had the telephone number on his phone so called it and left a message.

Whilst this took place, Bronte and Isabella were with their grandparents playing ball in the back paddock. Cassie, Michael, my husband and I had moved to the back verandah. When an officer of the Department of Child Safety called back as requested, Michael put the phone on loudspeaker. He and Cassie spoke to the DCS officer separately. Michael and Cassie heard what each other was saying to the officer and his answers to them both. I heard Cassie explain that she was worried about the children’s sexually inappropriate behaviour and requests for help and she now had a copy of “Everybody’s got a bottom” which is a child protection book for young children published by Queensland Family Planning and recommended by Child Safety. Cassie was asked if the girls were living with her and she said “Yes” but Michael was to have unsupervised access to the girls that weekend. The DCS officer told Cassie that if she felt the girls were at risk, she must remove them from the risk or take the risk from them. Michael finally said “OK, I won’t see them” to the officer. Cassie asked the officer who would be the person interviewing Isabella on Monday and was told it would be Constable Rob Garnett. Isabella was never interviewed. The officer said that nothing could be done to sort Michael’s issue before Monday when the appropriate person was available. It was suggested that Bronte and Isabella stay with Cassie.

Michael then demanded to know from Cassie what Bronte and Isabella had said about him. Cassie informed him that she hadn’t asked the girls any questions because she wasn’t allowed to. Michael said ‘That was stupid’ and persisted in harassing Cassie up close in an angry arrogant manner until she was reduced to tears.

My husband Ridley stepped up to Michael and Cassie saying that “enough was enough” and Michael agreed to leave. Michael stomped off angrily. Michael went to the back paddock and found Bronte and Isabella with their grandparents. Isabella ran back to the house to her mother.

6. On Saturday 8th October 2011 I was at the Doubleday’s home when Michael came to pick up Bronte and Isabella for an access visit. Both children had retreated to the swimming pool area as they did not want to go with Michael. Cassie tried to calm them down. Michael came up to me and said ,”As you have been brought into this you need to know that I’ve been cleared by Child Safety. Were you told?” He also said “Child Safety said that the children could be taken away from both parents.” He was visibly very angry and I walked away.

Isabella was still refusing to accompany her father, even though her mother was encouraging. Isabella said to Cassie that she was telling her about what daddy did because she was a ‘safe person’ , safe persons were supposed to help children to stop wrong behaviour and yet she was doing nothing to help her. Isabella then asked to speak to Carolyn Seri (her child psychologist).

Michael heard this, shook his head and stormed out of the house carrying Bronte in his arms. Isabella spoke to Carolyn Seri and after a while she hesitantly agreed to go. However, when we reached the front door, Isabella stopped again and repeated that she didn’t want to go. Cassie picked her up and hugged her and assured her that she would have a great time with her daddy at the beach. Cassie had to carry Isabella to the car and clipped her in. Isabella just went silent and dropped her head.

7. A DVO was put on Michael for Cassie and Isabella because of his intimidating behaviour. The DVO was taken out 9th November, 2011.

8. In late November 2012, I returned to Queensland to give evidence in the Family Court in custody proceedings. By that time the two daughters were in the custody of their father. We had to stay in Queensland over 11 months because the Court was often adjourned. Before leaving Queensland on 16.10.2013 to return to home to Western Australia, my husband and I sent the same copies of our attached written statements plus a copy of my affidavit to a Detective Ben Hunt in Townsville via the Ipswich Police Station. We have a receipt no. S498281 Queensland Police Service Field Property Receipt which has all our details on it including the fact that the information was being sent to Stuart Police Station Detective Hunt. The policeman’s name who served us was Sergeant Randall NO. 4031864. An accompanying letter which was sent with the information was witnessed by Constable A. Randall No. 4031864 signed and dated 10.30am 16/10/2013 Wednesday Ipswich Police Station. We have never received acknowledgement from Townsville, of the information supplied having been received. The information went via the internal police mail system.

In the early days when of Bronte and Isabella lived with Arthur and Heather Doubleday (their grandparents), Michael was never refused access to the children. Bronte and Isabella’s behaviour became very withdrawn and sometimes quite erratic when Michael arrived. When Michael asked for overnight visits, Bronte and Isabella told Cassie they didn’t want to go with their daddy, but wanted to stay with Nana and Poppy. Cassie always encouraged Bronte and Isabella to go on day outings with Michael regardless of the adult situation.

Cassie was accused of coaching the girls to make false allegations against their father. That is absolute nonsense. She was examined by three psychiatrists and two psychologists and each time was given a favourable report. Michael derided all of them.

Cassie never said anything derogatory about their father in the children’s presence. She was only interested in their welfare and safety. I implore you to please investigate this case further as I know we are not the only people who can testify to the allegations of sexual abuse made by these children. Cassie could not have “coached” the children because her contact with them has been supervised over the last few years. Far from encouraging the children to make false allegations, Cassie ignored their disclosures and changed the subject which of course, is contrary to best practice.

Regardless of the other complaints about the behaviour of Townsville Police, the question I would like answered is why none of the witnesses such as ourselves, the psychologist and court approved supervisors have not been interviewed relating to Bronte and Isabella Watter’s abuse disclosures.

9. I am aware that the mother and children are in hiding and the court has already said that she will be jailed and banned from seeing the children when they are located. I also know that they are in hiding because the mother learned from one of the girls at the supervised contact centre that she had “gunk” (discharge) coming from her vagina. The mother also learned from the GP that one of the girls had a sexually transmitted infection and a torn anus and Townsville Police Detective Sgt David Miles said (recorded on DVD) that they would never investigate further allegations because the father had never abused them and never would… a promise that no competent professional would ever make.

A similar letter such as this one, being sent to you now was sent to the previous minister August 5th 2014. I received a phone call from a policeman named Nixon, and because of his terse manner and attitude towards me I did not get his rank or serial number. He informed me that there was an investigation happening and that he could not answer any questions. He also demanded to know where the children were, not once but a couple times. My answer then and now is “I do not know where the girls are.”

Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here)

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

1,139 total views, no views today

#UPDATED What is #FreeMissingTwins About Via #Leak1 #WikiDetectives

Find THE Missing Watter Twins #Leak1

This web page has been set up as a result of “ LEAKS “ that WikiDetectives has received over the last couple of weeks . Said “ LEAKS “ have led WikiDetectives into calling for a reinvestigation into the Watter Twins court case to enable the truth to come out so that these poor children may return to a normal lifestyle . Please Share and Sign This Petition (Click Here)

There appears to have been gross mismanagement and corruption by the authorities concerned and this applies in particular to the police and the judges .

We will , however , publish the “ LEAKS ” we have received and will leave it up to you to decide who is at fault here .

Any further “ LEAKS ” received will be published on an if and when received basis !

If YOU the public perceive that what has happened to be unjust , then we leave it up to you to do what needs to be done .

See hereunder the first “LEAK “that has been received .

Subject: Paedophile , Michael Watter and his friends Stephen Heilbronn and Ryan Quinn . Please see below detailed information pertaining to the paedophile Michael Watter , his friend Stephen Heilbronn and their friend/supporter , Ryan Quinn . These individuals have a great deal to answer for .

Report from the Late Professor Freda Briggs Emeritus Professor in Child Development University of South Australia Magill Campus SA5072 on the child rape of the Watter Twins

Contact Supervisor’s Reports

I have read 93 reports written by thirteen contact supervisors :

a. Rae Greaves

b. Lynette Bartlett

c. R.M Bartlett

d. Rhonda Lane

e. Hollie Malardi

f. Virginia Hall

g. Maureen Land

h. Mathew Morrison

i. Wendy Williams

j. Wendy Willcox

k. Alex Dronysius

l. Karin Carmichael

m. Norm Land

It is stated that the children made frequent disclosures of sexual abuse by their father to thirteen different people namely :

a. Their mother

b. Their maternal grandmother

c. Family friend Patricia Plasted

d. Family friend Desiree Taylor

e. Psychologist Caroline Seri

f. GP Dr.Rebecca McGowen

g. Occupational therapist Lucy Dall-Alba

h. Family friend Christine Young

and the following independent supervisors ;

i. Lynette Bartlett

j. Rhonda Lane

k. Rae Greaves

l. Virginia Hall

m. Hollie Mallardi

In my professional experience , the fact that the children made consistent disclosures of sexual abuse by their father to a number of people additional to their mother suggests that (a) these disclosures are credible and (b) they persisted in making reports because none of the trusted adults responded and stopped the abusive behaviour . The behaviour described consisted of :

1. The father rubbing his penis against the vaginas of the 5 year old twins and making them sore

2. The father ”playing “with his penis

3. His penis went stiff when the child had to play with it

4. The father telling the children that the game was a secret

5. The father telling the children that police cannot be trusted

6. The father being angry because the children had reported being abused

All of the above are consistent with child sex victimisation as shown in the professional literature, my own professional experience and research with victims and offenders . It is therefore, a serious concern that neither police nor child safety officers charged with investigating this case appear to have read or taken account of the reports of the thirteen named people . It is especially a concern that they ignored the reports made by professionals such as psychologist Caroline Seri who , a former employee of the Child Safety Department , thought the evidence sufficiently serious to report child sexual abuse to the authorities . She sent a copy of a child’s sexually explicit drawing with the child’s statement that daddy placed his penis between her legs .

Police and safety officers also appear to have ignored the report of psychiatrist Dr. Satish Karunakaran (27.10.2012) who says quite clearly that

a. “ the father had custody of the children for more than 95% of the time and it seems strange to me that the Department is pointing the finger at Catherine ( the mother ) for her children’s abnormal behaviour given that she has had relatively little time with the children “ . The mother’s contact with the children had been supervised by independent supervisors and her behaviour was critiqued and reported .

b. “the notion that Catherine’s obsession with the matter ( i.e. sexual abuse by the father ) and repeated inspections and questioning of the children may have caused her children’s sexualised behaviours is unlikely . Moreover such questioning and inspections are unlikely to result in the observed behaviours “.

The psychiatrist also criticised the Department of Child Safety for failing to provide an assessment of the children by a specialist child psychiatrist .

I am in total agreement with Dr. Karunakaran’s comments . The mother’s natural anxiety would not have resulted in behaviours or drawings replicating adult sexual behaviour .The mother could not have trained the children of this age , as alleged by the father and child safety worker , to act out inappropriate sexual behaviours , least of all given that her contact with the children has been supervised for some time .

The explanations given for the number of disclosures of abuse are confused , contradictory and unprofessional , suggesting an inadequate understanding of the norms of child development , children’s thinking and responses to incest .

Police with the child safety officer attempted to put themselves in the role of psychologists to justify their support of the father’s innocence and the mother’s guilt and their statements and explanations are garbled and bizarre .

They said that the children make disclosures of abuse because their mother provides comfort . There is no evidence of this in the supervisor’s detailed reports on her parental behaviour .The mother and children enjoy a mutually affectionate relationship but, when disclosures were made , the mother distracted them . At the taped meeting with police and the child safety officer , the mother is condemned for distracting them saying that she should have questioned them further ; at the same time , they illogically claimed that her questioning of the children ( for which there is no evidence in the reports made by the contact supervisors ) caused emotional damage which , in turn , resulted in problematic sexual behaviours and repeated disclosures .

A supervisor reported on one occasion that when one of the children said that daddy had stopped hurting her vagina , the mother responded that this was good news .

My professional knowledge and experience leads me to believe that the children persisted in making disclosures of abuse because the trusted adults who received them were unable to stop the behaviour they complained of .When something is very worrying to young children they will persist in repeating their complaint to try to convince trusted adults that they need help . The fact that no-one stopped the unwanted and worrying behaviour would have led to the children’s persistence in making reports

Facts of Interest

My observations on the rape and abuse of Bronte and Isabella Watter

These children told me when I collected them and their mother that besides the rape and abuse by their father Michael Watter that he let his friend Stephen Heilbronn do the same . This occurred on numerous occasions . Many of the people involved in the evidence provided but not used by the authorities have been harassed and intimidated by both Michael Watter , Stephen Heilbronn and his wife Sheree . The Help Find Isabella and Bronte Watter page has had numerous likes and shares as well as comments . Many people are on this page just to keep an eye on these child rapists . Many out of the goodness of their hearts are members because of their concern for the children without knowing the full story . This information will not only be shared to as many of these people as possible but it will also be sent via numerous emails to as many sports clubs , sporting associations , cricket clubs , rugby league and rugby union clubs , Rotary and Lion’s clubs . These same institutions will also get the information on their facebook pages as can possibly be managed and furthermore as many people on the page that we can reach will also receive this information . All the child protection pages on facebook will get this information via their pages and/or their websites . All school organisations in Brisbane and Townsville area will also get this information so they may take the necessary steps to protect the children in their care .We will also be sharing this information with the Hann and Quinn family in order to protect the children involved thereto only because Ryan Quinn in his wisdom offers great support for the child rapist . As many of the Watter and Heilbronn family members that I have managed to find will also get this information in one form or another and who has also threatened other individuals who he perceives to be involved in this dissemination of information !

That way it can NEVER be said that they were not informed should any further child rape and abuse occur !

One day when the mother and her children are allowed to return to this country the truth will be out there and these people will hopefully be in jail !

Facts of interest !

The Heilbronn family is well known in the Townsville and other areas for their interest in drugs as is evidenced by the recent sentencing of Stephen’s brother Peter who was jailed for 11 years .

It appears that Stephen and Sheree Heilbronn have influence within the Police and Child Safety departments .

Why have Child Safety and CPIU officers refused to interview or accept reports from the court approved supervisors ?

Why have the supervisor’s reports of disclosures of sexual abuse by the father Michael Watter to the girls been forwarded to the Independent Children’s lawyer and then sent onwards directly to the father ? This then gave the paedophile father Michael Watter the opportunity to persecute the girls for what they had been saying and ALSO allow him to coach them on what to say and what not to say !

Has the I.C.L interviewed the supervisors with regard to the girls disclosures ?

Has the I.C.L. ( Independent Children’s Lawyer ( so called Independent ) interviewed anyone on behalf of the children she was supposedly representing ?

What qualification – exactly – has the paedophile father Michael got to question and assess Cassie’s mental state ?

The paedophile Michael Watter did NOT agree to take the girls to doctors even when advised by the supervisors that they needed to be seen by a doctor . He also would NOT allow the girls any counselling with a Child Psychologist when he had custody of them even though they had been separated from their mother the primary care giver most of their lives .

Someone pretending to be the grandparents sent professor Freda Briggs emails asking for her to answer questions related to the whereabouts of Cassie and the children . Professor Freda Briggs reported these emails to the police .

Craig Weatherly ( Detective A/Inspector at the time ) reported to Freda that this was a trick but not a criminal offence so he would not be looking into it . It appears to me that the rape of a child is NOT an offence either judging by the amount of police action related to the interviews of all concerned ! Anyone of you please feel free to give him a call on 0417071303 or Work (07) 33644794 and ask him if this is the case as I have copies of all the correspondence should he deny it !

There is further correspondence from Freda Briggs to Craig Weatherly informing him she had been abused by the paedophile father Michael Watter on the telephone when she hadn’t given him the telephone number . Freda asked if the police had given him her number ? Craig Weatherly was also informed that she ( Freda ) had lodged a formal complaint with the police 16 months prior to this to which there had been no response or answer as usual ! Freda informed him that she was told the report on the abuse of the child should have been published that November and as of July the following year nothing had been done ! Why am I not surprised ?

Craig Weatherly was also asked at the same time why a copy of Freda’s complaint to the Crime and Misconduct Commission ( the complaint being about the behaviour of the police ) had been given to the paedophile father Michael Watter by the police ?

Once again I have copies of the correspondence even though Freda has passed away so why not ask him the question ?

There were three break ins at Cassie’s work and home and the only items taken were the children’s medical records , legal papers relating to the case and Cassie’s achievement awards — why don’t you ask Craig Weatherly how they are proceeding with their investigations on this matter ! WHAT – no further action – am SO surprised !!

There were no support people allowed for the children when they were interviewed !

There was no Child Safety person with Isabella when she was interviewed .

Cassie was denied a support person .

An indication of police bias is proven when the police doing the interview tell the children that they may say what they like in the interview room and they would not be punished for anything they said and the police did not take into account the fact ( or perhaps they did ) that the children might have been punished later after going home to their father .

Supervisors reported that the girls said that their Daddy had said that if they tell the police about their “secret “game that they would be taken away from Mummy and Daddy .

There were NO questions to the children about Daddy and what Daddy had said to the girls or that any thought was given to the fact that Daddy had coached the girls .

The police have used details from the supervisor’s reports to question the girls and yet the supervisors were not interviewed so they could give their side or explain their notes .

The police were far more respectful of Michael than they were of Cassie who was bullied by them . They shook Michael’s hand but not Cassies .

In addition to all of this the police doing the interviews lied to Cassie and Michael telling them the children had said that they missed both parents when in fact all they said was that had missed their mother . The police further told Cassie and Michael that the children had named both of them as “safe “people when the only person they initially mentioned was Cassie and only mentioned their father as a “safe “person when prompted to by the police ! The police also believed they were “safe “people as the mother had told them that this was the case and yet the supervisors had heard the children say that their father had told them that the police were NOT “safe ‘people !

The main people the children made disclosures to were the mother , the grandparents and SOME of the supervisors .

I could go on and on but if what you have read above does not convince you then there is not much else I can do to show the corruption and bias behind this case .

Cassie’s email was hacked after she went into hiding and emails pertaining to be from her were sent from her email address to Freda Briggs . Now who do YOU think would have hacked Cassie’s email – NO surely the the names of Michael Watter or Stephen Heilbronn did not come to mind ?

Michael Watter threatened one of the witnesses in order to prevent her from reporting allegations of sexual abuse made by the children against him ! I have a copy of the affidavit !

Michael Watter OFTEN told the girls that Cassie was NOT their mother but that Sheree Heilbronn was the mother !

Stephen and Sheree Heilbronn attended ALL court appearances – makes one wonder why doesn’t it ? Support persons ? I do not think so !

Does Michael Watter owe the grandparents thousands upon thousands of dollars ? I will give you one guess !

Stephen Heilbronn and Michael Watter were members of the Sunrise Rotary Club at Hermit Park in Townsville . This was a men’s only club ! Only too happy for someone to provide me with a list of members !

Lucia Taylor the lawyer ( I.C.L. ) was employed by Cassie not knowing she was VERY friendly with the Heilbronns ! No wonder they and Watter had such ready access to all of Cassie’s information ! Lucia Taylor did NOT supply the court with or mention the D.V.O Cassie had against Michael Watter ! Phone her at 07 47213499 at Purcell Taylor Lawyers if you do not believe me or email them at purlor@purcelltaylor.com.au and ask her !

An email was sent to a number of people and organisations by Julie Black giving information and naming several people as having participated in the sexual abuse of Isabella and Bronte Watter . Stephen Heilbronn is named in this email . What a shock ! Surprise ! Surprise !

It is known that Stephen Heilbronn threatened the grandparents on numerous occasions

Judge John Coker removed the children from Cassie and gave them over to Michael KNOWING that there was a Domestic Violence Order in place to protect the children and Cassie from Michael . No sign of bias or corruption is there ?

The police members Snr Sgt David Miles and Police Officer Michele Feint were present to observe the threats and bullying of the children and one Doctor Pamela Schults who had been asked to comment on the interviews and procedure has had her findings published in a law journal – read it — it will OPEN your eyes ! Look it up on her website www.unisa-an.academia.edu/DrPa melaSchults The report was published without identifying the participants .

The children had sexually transmitted vaginal infections and one of them had a bleeding anus ! So where do you think these injuries came from ? Why do you not ask Michael Watter and Stephen Heilbronn ?

Why has Michael Watter not been assessed by a psychiatrist ? !

The truth will OUT — one day !

By the way , have I mentioned that the paedophile father Michael Watter has been seen having lunch with the Judge ? Does not stink of corruption in any way at all – does it ?

Finally , why don’t you all take the time to share this information to all and sundry ? Why not ask these questions on the page and see how many times you may have your comments deleted ? These are sick , depraved people with NO conscience . Look out for your children !

WIKIDETECTIVES DISCLAIMER

Help us clarify the leaks we are leasing, so we can discover which are significant and which are not. You may securely and anonymously submit information via WikiLeaks 

WikiDetecives will prioritize the list based on the available information and seek to ascertain the leading candidates directly, through the legal system, or indirectly through our network of journalists, intelligence sources, volunteers and readers. If you email us (editor@wikidetectives.com.au) we will alert you when the record has been obtained.

The current order reflects the order of submission and is unlikely to be related to the final order. If you personally need help, press the RED SUPPORT BUTTON on Left side or click our toll-free number now 1800UNSEEN to connect to a Australian Cyber Detective Hotline.

1,157 total views, no views today